These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24904218)

  • 1. Comparison of the costs of nonoperative care to minimally invasive surgery for sacroiliac joint disruption and degenerative sacroiliitis in a United States commercial payer population: potential economic implications of a new minimally invasive technology.
    Ackerman SJ; Polly DW; Knight T; Schneider K; Holt T; Cummings J
    Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2014; 6():283-96. PubMed ID: 24904218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the costs of nonoperative care to minimally invasive surgery for sacroiliac joint disruption and degenerative sacroiliitis in a United States Medicare population: potential economic implications of a new minimally-invasive technology.
    Ackerman SJ; Polly DW; Knight T; Schneider K; Holt T; Cummings J
    Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2013; 5():575-87. PubMed ID: 24348055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Management of sacroiliac joint disruption and degenerative sacroiliitis with nonoperative care is medical resource-intensive and costly in a United States commercial payer population.
    Ackerman SJ; Polly DW; Knight T; Holt T; Cummings J
    Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2014; 6():63-74. PubMed ID: 24596468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonoperative care to manage sacroiliac joint disruption and degenerative sacroiliitis: high costs and medical resource utilization in the United States Medicare population.
    Ackerman SJ; Polly DW; Knight T; Holt T; Cummings J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Apr; 20(4):354-63. PubMed ID: 24527824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of postmarket complaints database for the iFuse SI Joint Fusion System®: a minimally invasive treatment for degenerative sacroiliitis and sacroiliac joint disruption.
    Miller LE; Reckling WC; Block JE
    Med Devices (Auckl); 2013; 6():77-84. PubMed ID: 23761982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for chronic sacroiliac joint pain: a systematic review.
    Chang E; Rains C; Ali R; Wines RC; Kahwati LC
    Spine J; 2022 Aug; 22(8):1240-1253. PubMed ID: 35017057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative effectiveness of open versus minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion.
    Ledonio CG; Polly DW; Swiontkowski MF; Cummings JT
    Med Devices (Auckl); 2014; 7():187-93. PubMed ID: 24940087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Open versus minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a multi-center comparison of perioperative measures and clinical outcomes.
    Smith AG; Capobianco R; Cher D; Rudolf L; Sachs D; Gundanna M; Kleiner J; Mody MG; Shamie AN
    Ann Surg Innov Res; 2013 Oct; 7(1):14. PubMed ID: 24172188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contemporary Trends in Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Utilization in the Medicare Population by Specialty.
    Hersh AM; Jimenez AE; Pellot KI; Gong JH; Jiang K; Khalifeh JM; Ahmed AK; Raad M; Veeravagu A; Ratliff JK; Jain A; Lubelski D; Bydon A; Witham TF; Theodore N; Azad TD
    Neurosurgery; 2023 Dec; 93(6):1244-1250. PubMed ID: 37306413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MIS Fusion of the SI Joint: Does Prior Lumbar Spinal Fusion Affect Patient Outcomes?
    Rudolf L
    Open Orthop J; 2013; 7():163-8. PubMed ID: 23730380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis associated low-back and leg pain over two years.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Bydon A; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
    World Neurosurg; 2012 Jul; 78(1-2):178-84. PubMed ID: 22120269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs. Non-Surgical Management: Six-Month Outcomes from a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Whang P; Cher D; Polly D; Frank C; Lockstadt H; Glaser J; Limoni R; Sembrano J
    Int J Spine Surg; 2015; 9():6. PubMed ID: 25785242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A systematic review of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion utilizing a lateral transarticular technique.
    Heiney J; Capobianco R; Cher D
    Int J Spine Surg; 2015; 9():40. PubMed ID: 26273558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Five-year clinical and radiographic outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular implants.
    Rudolf L; Capobianco R
    Open Orthop J; 2014; 8():375-83. PubMed ID: 25352932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive versus open sacroiliac joint fusion: are they similarly safe and effective?
    Ledonio CG; Polly DW; Swiontkowski MF
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jun; 472(6):1831-8. PubMed ID: 24519569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Utilization of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion in Surgeon Population of ISASS and SMISS Membership.
    Lorio MP; Polly DW; Ninkovic I; Ledonio CG; Hallas K; Andersson G
    Open Orthop J; 2014; 8():1-6. PubMed ID: 24551025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion.
    Cher DJ; Frasco MA; Arnold RJ; Polly DW
    Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2016; 8():1-14. PubMed ID: 26719717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. One-year outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with a series of triangular implants: a multicenter, patient-level analysis.
    Sachs D; Capobianco R; Cher D; Holt T; Gundanna M; Graven T; Shamie AN; Cummings J
    Med Devices (Auckl); 2014; 7():299-304. PubMed ID: 25210479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Postoperative complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive sacroiliac fusion.
    Schoell K; Buser Z; Jakoi A; Pham M; Patel NN; Hsieh PC; Liu JC; Wang JC
    Spine J; 2016 Nov; 16(11):1324-1332. PubMed ID: 27349627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.