These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

52 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2490435)

  • 1. [Case-control studies. Transversal studies].
    Gili M; Martínez-Cañabate E; Nieto C
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1989 Dec; 7(10):559-63. PubMed ID: 2490435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differential recall bias and spurious associations in case/control studies.
    Barry D
    Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(23):2603-16. PubMed ID: 8961466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Misclassification of genetic susceptibility biomarkers: implications for case-control studies and cross-population comparisons.
    Rothman N; Stewart WF; Caporaso NE; Hayes RB
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1993; 2(4):299-303. PubMed ID: 8348052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity analysis of misclassification: a graphical and a Bayesian approach.
    Chu H; Wang Z; Cole SR; Greenland S
    Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 16(11):834-41. PubMed ID: 16843678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the potential of measurement error to induce differential bias on odds ratio estimates: an example from radon epidemiology.
    Heid IM; Küchenhoff H; Wellmann J; Gerken M; Kreienbrock L; Wichmann HE
    Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(21):3261-78. PubMed ID: 12375303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Misclassification in case-control studies of gene-environment interactions: assessment of bias and sample size.
    Garcia-Closas M; Rothman N; Lubin J
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1999 Dec; 8(12):1043-50. PubMed ID: 10613335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of disease-dependent changes of exposure in cross-sectional studies.
    Brenner H; Blettner M
    Epidemiology; 1996 Sep; 7(5):502-6. PubMed ID: 8862981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders.
    Arah OA; Chiba Y; Greenland S
    Ann Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 18(8):637-46. PubMed ID: 18652982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recall bias in melanoma risk factors and measurement error effects: a nested case-control study within the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study.
    Parr CL; Hjartåker A; Laake P; Lund E; Veierød MB
    Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 169(3):257-66. PubMed ID: 19011116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response to "What kid of controls to use in case control studies of malformed infants: recall bias versus 'teratogen nonspecificity' bias".
    Prieto L; Martínez-Frias ML
    Teratology; 2000 Dec; 62(6):372-3. PubMed ID: 11155894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of self-reported family history of cancer in a large case-control study of lymphoma.
    Chang ET; Smedby KE; Hjalgrim H; Glimelius B; Adami HO
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Jan; 98(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 16391372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Basic methods for sensitivity analysis of biases.
    Greenland S
    Int J Epidemiol; 1996 Dec; 25(6):1107-16. PubMed ID: 9027513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selection of subjects for hospital-based epidemiologic studies based on outward manifestations of disease.
    Nishioka SA; Gyorkos TW; Joseph L; Collet JP
    Clin Invest Med; 2001 Dec; 24(6):299-303. PubMed ID: 11767233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simple formulas for gauging the potential impacts of population stratification bias.
    Lee WC; Wang LY
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 167(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 17881384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Interpretation of epidemiologic studies. Type of study, elements of bias, causality].
    Touzet S; Colin C
    Rev Prat; 1999 Oct; 49(16):1797-804. PubMed ID: 10578612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Confounding bias. Interaction].
    Gili M; Zunzunegui MV; Vilches A
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1990 Dec; 8(10):647-53. PubMed ID: 2098126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inference for case-control studies when exposure status is both informatively missing and misclassified.
    Lyles RH; Allen AS; Dana Flanders W; Kupper LL; Christensen DL
    Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(23):4065-80. PubMed ID: 16463349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Missing data in the 2 x 2 table: patterns and likelihood-based analysis for cross-sectional studies with supplemental sampling.
    Lyles RH; Allen AS
    Stat Med; 2003 Feb; 22(4):517-34. PubMed ID: 12590411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retrospective assessment of occupational exposures in the context of community-based case-control studies.
    Hémon D; Clavel J
    Med Lav; 1995; 86(2):152-67. PubMed ID: 7659040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design and analysis issues in case-control studies addressing genetic susceptibility.
    Brennan P
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (148):123-32. PubMed ID: 10493254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.