These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24904376)

  • 1. Critical neuroscience-or critical science? A perspective on the perceived normative significance of neuroscience.
    Schleim S
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():336. PubMed ID: 24904376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethical considerations of neuroscience research: the perspectives on neuroethics in Japan.
    Fukushi T; Sakura O; Koizumi H
    Neurosci Res; 2007 Jan; 57(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 17034890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Potential for bias in the context of neuroethics. Commentary on "Neuroscience, neuropolitics and neuroethics: the complex case of crime, deception and fMRI".
    Bird SJ
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2012 Sep; 18(3):593-600. PubMed ID: 23001457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Of Ethical Frameworks and Neuroethics in Big Neuroscience Projects: A View from the HBP.
    Salles A; Farisco M
    AJOB Neurosci; 2020; 11(3):167-175. PubMed ID: 32716744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The BRAIN Initiative and Neuroethics: Enabling and Enhancing Neuroscience Advances for Society.
    Eberwine J; Kahn J
    AJOB Neurosci; 2020; 11(3):135-139. PubMed ID: 32716755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science-practice gap in ecology and conservation.
    Bertuol-Garcia D; Morsello C; N El-Hani C; Pardini R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2018 May; 93(2):1032-1055. PubMed ID: 29160024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Practical implications of empirically studying moral decision-making.
    Heinzelmann N; Ugazio G; Tobler PN
    Front Neurosci; 2012; 6():94. PubMed ID: 22783157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the Nature of Explanations Offered by Network Science: A Perspective From and for Practicing Neuroscientists.
    Bertolero MA; Bassett DS
    Top Cogn Sci; 2020 Oct; 12(4):1272-1293. PubMed ID: 32441854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neuroethics 1995-2012. A Bibliometric Analysis of the Guiding Themes of an Emerging Research Field.
    Leefmann J; Levallois C; Hildt E
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():336. PubMed ID: 27445772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the Perceived Value of Neuroethics Questions and Policy to Neuro-Entrepreneurs.
    Moss AU; Li ZR; Rommelfanger KS
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():702019. PubMed ID: 34720850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neuroethics: Fostering Collaborations to Enable Neuroscientific Discovery.
    Farahany N; Ramos KM
    AJOB Neurosci; 2020; 11(3):148-154. PubMed ID: 32716745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrating Cognitive Developmental Neuroscience in Society: Lessons Learned From a Multidisciplinary Research Project on Education and Social Safety of Youth.
    Vandenbroucke ARE; Crone EA; van Erp JBF; Güroğlu B; Hulshoff Pol HE; de Kogel CH; Krabbendam L; Jansen LMC; Brouwer AM
    Front Integr Neurosci; 2021; 15():756640. PubMed ID: 34880735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A fallacious jar? The peculiar relation between descriptive premises and normative conclusions in neuroethics.
    Wagner NF; Northoff G
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2015 Jun; 36(3):215-35. PubMed ID: 25985843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What is a representative brain? Neuroscience meets population science.
    Falk EB; Hyde LW; Mitchell C; Faul J; Gonzalez R; Heitzeg MM; Keating DP; Langa KM; Martz ME; Maslowsky J; Morrison FJ; Noll DC; Patrick ME; Pfeffer FT; Reuter-Lorenz PA; Thomason ME; Davis-Kean P; Monk CS; Schulenberg J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Oct; 110(44):17615-22. PubMed ID: 24151336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Moral Enhancement Meets Normative and Empirical Reality: Assessing the Practical Feasibility of Moral Enhancement Neurotechnologies.
    Dubljević V; Racine E
    Bioethics; 2017 Jun; 31(5):338-348. PubMed ID: 28503833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can Neuroscience Contribute to Practical Ethics? A Critical Review and Discussion of the Methodological and Translational Challenges of the Neuroscience of Ethics.
    Racine E; Dubljević V; Jox RJ; Baertschi B; Christensen JF; Farisco M; Jotterand F; Kahane G; Müller S
    Bioethics; 2017 Jun; 31(5):328-337. PubMed ID: 28503831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The medicalization of ethics or ethicalization of neuroscience: Toward a conceptual re-examination.
    Namazi H; Mirikermanshahi S
    IBRO Neurosci Rep; 2024 Jun; 16():567-570. PubMed ID: 38764540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neuroethics Questions to Guide Ethical Research in the International Brain Initiatives.
    ; Rommelfanger KS; Jeong SJ; Ema A; Fukushi T; Kasai K; Ramos KM; Salles A; Singh I
    Neuron; 2018 Oct; 100(1):19-36. PubMed ID: 30308169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three requirements for justifying an educational neuroscience.
    Hruby GG
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2012 Mar; 82(Pt 1):1-23. PubMed ID: 22429055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neuroscience, moral reasoning, and the law.
    Knabb JJ; Welsh RK; Ziebell JG; Reimer KS
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(2):219-36. PubMed ID: 19241396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.