These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24904445)

  • 1. Group membership prediction when known groups consist of unknown subgroups: a Monte Carlo comparison of methods.
    Finch WH; Bolin JH; Kelley K
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():337. PubMed ID: 24904445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of Depression in Cancer Patients With Different Classification Criteria, Linear Discriminant Analysis versus Logistic Regression.
    Shayan Z; Mohammad Gholi Mezerji N; Shayan L; Naseri P
    Glob J Health Sci; 2015 Nov; 8(7):41-6. PubMed ID: 26925900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. From projection pursuit and CART to adaptive discriminant analysis?
    Gribonval R
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw; 2005 May; 16(3):522-32. PubMed ID: 15940983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing linear discriminant analysis and supervised learning algorithms for binary classification-A method comparison study.
    Graf R; Zeldovich M; Friedrich S
    Biom J; 2024 Jan; 66(1):e2200098. PubMed ID: 36529690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supervised classification in the presence of misclassified training data: a Monte Carlo simulation study in the three group case.
    Bolin JH; Finch WH
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():118. PubMed ID: 24616711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Classification trees as an alternative to linear discriminant analysis.
    Feldesman MR
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2002 Nov; 119(3):257-75. PubMed ID: 12365038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of linear and mixture models for discriminant analysis under nonnormality.
    Rausch JR; Kelley K
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Feb; 41(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 19182127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of multigroup logistic and linear discriminant ECG and VCG classification.
    Willems JL; Lesaffre E
    J Electrocardiol; 1987 Apr; 20(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 2955068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Logistic regression and CART in the analysis of multimarker studies.
    Muller R; Möckel M
    Clin Chim Acta; 2008 Aug; 394(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 18455512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using data mining techniques in monitoring diabetes care. The simpler the better?
    Gregori D; Petrinco M; Bo S; Rosato R; Pagano E; Berchialla P; Merletti F
    J Med Syst; 2011 Apr; 35(2):277-81. PubMed ID: 20703563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scores selection via Fisher's discriminant power in PCA-LDA to improve the classification of food data.
    de Almeida VE; de Sousa Fernandes DD; Diniz PHGD; de Araújo Gomes A; Véras G; Galvão RKH; Araujo MCU
    Food Chem; 2021 Nov; 363():130296. PubMed ID: 34144419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-dimensional linear discriminant analysis for classification of three-way chemical data.
    Silva AC; Soares SF; Insausti M; Galvão RK; Band BS; Araújo MC
    Anal Chim Acta; 2016 Sep; 938():53-62. PubMed ID: 27619086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex estimation: a comparison of techniques based on binary logistic, probit and cumulative probit regression, linear and quadratic discriminant analysis, neural networks, and naïve Bayes classification using ordinal variables.
    Nikita E; Nikitas P
    Int J Legal Med; 2020 May; 134(3):1213-1225. PubMed ID: 31444553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Penalized classification using Fisher's linear discriminant.
    Witten DM; Tibshirani R
    J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol; 2011 Nov; 73(5):753-772. PubMed ID: 22323898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Classification models for neocryptolepine derivatives as inhibitors of the β-haematin formation.
    Dejaegher B; Dhooghe L; Goodarzi M; Apers S; Pieters L; Vander Heyden Y
    Anal Chim Acta; 2011 Oct; 705(1-2):98-110. PubMed ID: 21962353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction model optimization using full model selection with regression trees demonstrated with FTIR data from bovine milk.
    Tremblay M; Kammer M; Lange H; Plattner S; Baumgartner C; Stegeman JA; Duda J; Mansfeld R; Döpfer D
    Prev Vet Med; 2019 Feb; 163():14-23. PubMed ID: 30670181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Generalized discriminant analysis: a matrix exponential approach.
    Zhang T; Fang B; Tang YY; Shang Z; Xu B
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2010 Feb; 40(1):186-97. PubMed ID: 19651556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of linear discriminant analysis methods for the classification of cancer based on gene expression data.
    Huang D; Quan Y; He M; Zhou B
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2009 Dec; 28(1):149. PubMed ID: 20003274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.