These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24904999)

  • 1. The locus of the emotional Stroop effect: a study with the PRP paradigm.
    Janczyk M; Augst S; Kunde W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():8-15. PubMed ID: 24904999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Global-local processing and dispositional bias interact with emotion processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Kerusauskaite SG; Simione L; Raffone A; Srinivasan N
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Feb; 238(2):345-354. PubMed ID: 31925476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When emotion does and does not impair performance: a Garner theory of the emotional Stroop effect.
    Mama Y; Ben-Haim MS; Algom D
    Cogn Emot; 2013; 27(4):589-602. PubMed ID: 23025518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anxiety, emotional distraction, and attentional control in the Stroop task.
    Kalanthroff E; Henik A; Derakshan N; Usher M
    Emotion; 2016 Apr; 16(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 26571078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adaptation to (non)valent task disturbance.
    Kunde W; Augst S; Kleinsorge T
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2012 Dec; 12(4):644-60. PubMed ID: 22936069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decomposing the emotional Stroop effect.
    Frings C; Englert J; Wentura D; Bermeitinger C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 19691003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is the emotional Stroop task a special case of mood induction? Evidence from sustained effects of attention under emotion.
    Ben-Haim MS; Mama Y; Icht M; Algom D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):81-97. PubMed ID: 24043566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference.
    Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Usher M; Henik A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1356-67. PubMed ID: 23163896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The facilitating effect of positive emotions during an emotional Stroop task.
    Liu X; Yang Y; Jiang S; Li J
    Neuroreport; 2018 Aug; 29(11):883-888. PubMed ID: 29742618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The cognitive loci of the display and task-relevant set size effects on distractor interference: Evidence from a dual-task paradigm.
    Park BY; Kim S; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):337-351. PubMed ID: 29124674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dual-task interference and response strategies in simulated car driving: impact of first-task characteristics on the psychological refractory period effect.
    Bock O; Wechsler K; Koch I; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):568-576. PubMed ID: 31776662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sequential modulations of valence processing in the emotional Stroop task.
    Kunde W; Mauer N
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 18549161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Locus of backward crosstalk effects on task 1 in a psychological refractory period task.
    Ko YT; Miller J
    Exp Psychol; 2014 Jan; 61(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 23948390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multisession, dual-task psychological refractory period practice benefits older and younger adults equally.
    Allen PA; Ruthruff E; Elicker JD; Lien MC
    Exp Aging Res; 2009 Oct; 35(4):369-99. PubMed ID: 20183098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. First-graders' allocation of attentional resources in an emotional Stroop task: The role of heart period variability and classroom climate.
    Scrimin S; Moscardino U; Mason L
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2019 Mar; 89(1):146-164. PubMed ID: 29888389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) perform in a modified emotional Stroop task.
    Allritz M; Call J; Borkenau P
    Anim Cogn; 2016 May; 19(3):435-49. PubMed ID: 26613593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional constraints on semantic activation: Evidence from Stroop's paradigm.
    White D; Besner D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():4-11. PubMed ID: 27594342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Processing two tasks with varying task order: central stage duration influences central processing order.
    Ruiz Fernández S; Leonhard T; Rolke B; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 21427007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content.
    Ben-Haim MS; Williams P; Howard Z; Mama Y; Eidels A; Algom D
    J Vis Exp; 2016 Jun; (112):. PubMed ID: 27405091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Asymmetric interference in concurrent time-to-contact estimation: Cousin or twin of the psychological refractory period effect?
    Baurès R; DeLucia PR; Olson M; Oberfeld D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):698-711. PubMed ID: 27896708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.