These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24905739)

  • 1. Designing Issues in Confirmatory Adaptive Population Enrichment Trials.
    Wassmer G; Dragalin V
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(4):651-69. PubMed ID: 24905739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On sample size determination in multi-armed confirmatory adaptive designs.
    Wassmer G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jul; 21(4):802-17. PubMed ID: 21516570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Data-driven analysis strategies for proportion studies in adaptive group sequential test designs.
    Wassmer G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Nov; 13(4):585-603. PubMed ID: 14584710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical considerations for testing multiple endpoints in group sequential or adaptive clinical trials.
    Hung HM; Wang SJ; O'Neill R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(6):1201-10. PubMed ID: 18027226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nested combination tests with a time-to-event endpoint using a short-term endpoint for design adaptations.
    Jörgens S; Wassmer G; König F; Posch M
    Pharm Stat; 2019 May; 18(3):329-350. PubMed ID: 30652401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repeated confidence intervals for adaptive group sequential trials.
    Mehta CR; Bauer P; Posch M; Brannath W
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5422-33. PubMed ID: 17918195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On efficient two-stage adaptive designs for clinical trials with sample size adjustment.
    Liu Q; Li G; Anderson KM; Lim P
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):617-40. PubMed ID: 22651105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The advantages and disadvantages of adaptive designs for clinical trials.
    Bauer P; Brannath W
    Drug Discov Today; 2004 Apr; 9(8):351-7. PubMed ID: 15081962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimizing trial design in pharmacogenetics research: comparing a fixed parallel group, group sequential, and adaptive selection design on sample size requirements.
    Boessen R; van der Baan F; Groenwold R; Egberts A; Klungel O; Grobbee D; Knol M; Roes K
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(6):366-74. PubMed ID: 24214896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simple and flexible graphical approach for adaptive group-sequential clinical trials.
    Sugitani T; Bretz F; Maurer W
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(2):202-16. PubMed ID: 25372071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Regulatory perspectives on multiplicity in adaptive design clinical trials throughout a drug development program.
    Wang SJ; Hung HM; O'Neill R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jul; 21(4):846-59. PubMed ID: 21516573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Type I error rate control in adaptive designs for confirmatory clinical trials with treatment selection at interim.
    Posch M; Maurer W; Bretz F
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(2):96-104. PubMed ID: 22328314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimization of adaptive designs: efficiency evaluation.
    Menon S; Chang M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):641-61. PubMed ID: 22651106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Issues in designing flexible trials.
    Posch M; Bauer P; Brannath W
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):953-69. PubMed ID: 12627412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptive methods: when and how should they be used in clinical trials?
    Porcher R; Lecocq B; Vray M;
    Therapie; 2011; 66(4):319-26, 309-17. PubMed ID: 21851793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of inferential procedures for adaptive clinical trial designs with pre-specified rules for modifying the sample size.
    Levin GP; Emerson SC; Emerson SS
    Biometrics; 2014 Sep; 70(3):556-67. PubMed ID: 24766094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptive Dunnett tests for treatment selection.
    Koenig F; Brannath W; Bretz F; Posch M
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1612-25. PubMed ID: 17876763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation in flexible two stage designs.
    Brannath W; König F; Bauer P
    Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(19):3366-81. PubMed ID: 16220489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tradeoff-based optimization criteria in clinical trials with multiple objectives and adaptive designs.
    Dmitrienko A; Paux G; Pulkstenis E; Zhang J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(1):120-40. PubMed ID: 26391238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptive designs for confirmatory clinical trials.
    Bretz F; Koenig F; Brannath W; Glimm E; Posch M
    Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(8):1181-217. PubMed ID: 19206095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.