These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24905878)

  • 1. Effects of biomechanical properties of the bone-implant interface on dental implant stability: from in silico approaches to the patient's mouth.
    Haïat G; Wang HL; Brunski J
    Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2014 Jul; 16():187-213. PubMed ID: 24905878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical determinants of the stability of dental implants: influence of the bone-implant interface properties.
    Mathieu V; Vayron R; Richard G; Lambert G; Naili S; Meningaud JP; Haiat G
    J Biomech; 2014 Jan; 47(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 24268798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces.
    Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1523-39. PubMed ID: 10632528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of implant thread design on stress distribution in anisotropic bone with different osseointegration conditions: a finite element analysis.
    Mosavar A; Ziaei A; Kadkhodaei M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1317-26. PubMed ID: 26478976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental-implant interface.
    Brunski JB
    Adv Dent Res; 1999 Jun; 13():99-119. PubMed ID: 11276755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dental implant design and its relationship to long-term implant success.
    Steigenga JT; al-Shammari KF; Nociti FH; Misch CE; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2003; 12(4):306-17. PubMed ID: 14752967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variables affecting survival of single-tooth hydroxyapatite-coated implants in anterior maxillae at 3 years.
    Orenstein IH; Petrazzuolo V; Morris HF; Ochi S
    Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 11885184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A retrospective radiographic analysis of bone loss following placement of TiO2 grit-blasted implants in the posterior maxilla and mandible.
    Warren P; Chaffee N; Felton DA; Cooper LF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 12074456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A review of improved fixation methods for dental implants. Part II: biomechanical integrity at bone-implant interface.
    Shibata Y; Tanimoto Y; Maruyama N; Nagakura M
    J Prosthodont Res; 2015 Apr; 59(2):84-95. PubMed ID: 25797023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implants in bone: part II. Research on implant osseointegration: material testing, mechanical testing, imaging and histoanalytical methods.
    von Wilmowsky C; Moest T; Nkenke E; Stelzle F; Schlegel KA
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 18(4):355-72. PubMed ID: 23430020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stress transfer properties of different commercial dental implants: a finite element study.
    Pérez MA; Prados-Frutos JC; Bea JA; Doblaré M
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2012; 15(3):263-73. PubMed ID: 21170768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of dental implants as orthodontic anchorage.
    Gallas MM; Abeleira MT; Fernández JR; Burguera M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Feb; 27(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 15743858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigation of bone inelastic response in interaction phenomena with dental implants.
    Natali AN; Carniel EL; Pavan PG
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):561-9. PubMed ID: 18207565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnitude and direction of mechanical stress at the osseointegrated interface of the microthread implant.
    Hudieb MI; Wakabayashi N; Kasugai S
    J Periodontol; 2011 Jul; 82(7):1061-70. PubMed ID: 21189091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implant surface material, design, and osseointegration.
    Ogle OE
    Dent Clin North Am; 2015 Apr; 59(2):505-20. PubMed ID: 25835806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stability of the bone-implant complex. Results of longitudinal testing to 60 months with the Periotest device on endosseous dental implants.
    Truhlar RS; Morris HF; Ochi S
    Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):42-55. PubMed ID: 11885181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical properties of bone tissues surrounding dental implant systems with different treatments and healing periods.
    Kim DG; Kwon HJ; Jeong YH; Kosel E; Lee DJ; Han JS; Kim HL; Kim DJ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Nov; 20(8):2211-2220. PubMed ID: 26832783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A finite element stress analysis of the transmandibular implant system.
    Williams KR; Murphy WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 11843446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. FGF-2 promotes initial osseointegration and enhances stability of implants with low primary stability.
    Nagayasu-Tanaka T; Nozaki T; Miki K; Sawada K; Kitamura M; Murakami S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Mar; 28(3):291-297. PubMed ID: 26919334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional finite element analyses of four designs of a high-strength silicon nitride implant.
    Lin S; Shi S; LeGeros RZ; LeGeros JP
    Implant Dent; 2000; 9(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 11307234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.