BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24905904)

  • 1. Comparison of Paired ROC Curves through a Two-Stage Test.
    Yu W; Park E; Chang YC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):881-902. PubMed ID: 24905904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A conditional nonparametric test for comparing two areas under the ROC curves from a paired design.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 15766688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A permutation test sensitive to differences in areas for comparing ROC curves from a paired design.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2873-93. PubMed ID: 16134144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A permutation test for comparing ROC curves in multireader studies a multi-reader ROC, permutation test.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 16554220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
    Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape.
    Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 27884464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the use of partial area under the ROC curve for comparison of two diagnostic tests.
    Ma H; Bandos AI; Gur D
    Biom J; 2015 Mar; 57(2):304-20. PubMed ID: 25537143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tests of equivalence and non-inferiority for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired areas under ROC curves.
    Liu JP; Ma MC; Wu CY; Tai JY
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1219-38. PubMed ID: 16158400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A global goodness-of-fit test for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis via the bootstrap method.
    Zou KH; Resnic FS; Talos IF; Goldberg-Zimring D; Bhagwat JG; Haker SJ; Kikinis R; Jolesz FA; Ohno-Machado L
    J Biomed Inform; 2005 Oct; 38(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 16198998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.
    Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marker selection via maximizing the partial area under the ROC curve of linear risk scores.
    Wang Z; Chang YC
    Biostatistics; 2011 Apr; 12(2):369-85. PubMed ID: 20729218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of ROC curve with complex survey data.
    Yao W; Li Z; Graubard BI
    Stat Med; 2015 Apr; 34(8):1293-303. PubMed ID: 25546290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Novel "Maximizing Kappa" Approach for Assessing the Ability of a Diagnostic Marker and Its Optimal Cutoff Value.
    Chang CH; Yang JT; Lee MH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):1005-19. PubMed ID: 24918528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
    Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An enhancement of ROC curves made them clinically relevant for diagnostic-test comparison and optimal-threshold determination.
    Subtil F; Rabilloud M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jul; 68(7):752-9. PubMed ID: 25660050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ROC-ing along: Evaluation and interpretation of receiver operating characteristic curves.
    Carter JV; Pan J; Rai SN; Galandiuk S
    Surgery; 2016 Jun; 159(6):1638-1645. PubMed ID: 26962006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semiparametric empirical likelihood confidence intervals for the difference of areas under two correlated ROC curves under density ratio model.
    Zhang D; Zhang B
    Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):678-96. PubMed ID: 24648388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incorporating utility-weights when comparing two diagnostic systems: a preliminary assessment.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Oct; 12(10):1293-300. PubMed ID: 16179206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A non-parametric method for the comparison of partial areas under ROC curves and its application to large health care data sets.
    Zhang DD; Zhou XH; Freeman DH; Freeman JL
    Stat Med; 2002 Mar; 21(5):701-15. PubMed ID: 11870811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.
    Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 17139702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.