These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24905994)
1. Conducting systematic reviews of intervention questions I: Writing the review protocol, formulating the question and searching the literature. O'Connor AM; Anderson KM; Goodell CK; Sargeant JM Zoonoses Public Health; 2014 Jun; 61 Suppl 1():28-38. PubMed ID: 24905994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Conducting systematic reviews of intervention questions II: Relevance screening, data extraction, assessing risk of bias, presenting the results and interpreting the findings. Sargeant JM; O'Connor AM Zoonoses Public Health; 2014 Jun; 61 Suppl 1():39-51. PubMed ID: 24905995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conducting systematic reviews of intervention questions III: Synthesizing data from intervention studies using meta-analysis. O'Connor AM; Sargeant JM; Wang C Zoonoses Public Health; 2014 Jun; 61 Suppl 1():52-63. PubMed ID: 24905996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A review of the reporting of web searching to identify studies for Cochrane systematic reviews. Briscoe S Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 29065246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The "realist search": A systematic scoping review of current practice and reporting. Booth A; Briscoe S; Wright JM Res Synth Methods; 2020 Jan; 11(1):14-35. PubMed ID: 31714016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Information sources for obesity prevention policy research: a review of systematic reviews. Hanneke R; Young SK Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 6(1):156. PubMed ID: 28789703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews - are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders? Aagaard T; Lund H; Juhl C BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):161. PubMed ID: 27875992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Introduction to systematic reviews in animal agriculture and veterinary medicine. Sargeant JM; O'Connor AM Zoonoses Public Health; 2014 Jun; 61 Suppl 1():3-9. PubMed ID: 24905991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Study designs and systematic reviews of interventions: building evidence across study designs. Sargeant JM; Kelton DF; O'Connor AM Zoonoses Public Health; 2014 Jun; 61 Suppl 1():10-7. PubMed ID: 24905992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension. Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Information retrieval for systematic reviews in food and feed topics: A narrative review. Wood H; O'Connor A; Sargeant J; Glanville J Res Synth Methods; 2018 Dec; 9(4):527-539. PubMed ID: 29316306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Overview: comprehensive and carefully constructed strategies are required when conducting searches for adverse effects data. Golder S; Peryer G; Loke YK J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 113():36-43. PubMed ID: 31150833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electronic searching of the literature for systematic reviews of screening and diagnostic tests for preterm birth. Honest H; Bachmann LM; Khan K Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2003 Mar; 107(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 12593888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conducting efficient literature searches. Cleary M; Hunt GE; Horsfall J J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv; 2009 Nov; 47(11):34-41. PubMed ID: 19921761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a Search Strategy for an Evidence Based Retrieval Service. Ho GJ; Liew SM; Ng CJ; Hisham Shunmugam R; Glasziou P PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0167170. PubMed ID: 27935993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Systematic searching for theory to inform systematic reviews: is it feasible? Is it desirable? Booth A; Carroll C Health Info Libr J; 2015 Sep; 32(3):220-35. PubMed ID: 26095232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Protocol: a systematic review of studies developing and/or evaluating search strategies to identify prognosis studies. Corp N; Jordan JL; Hayden JA; Irvin E; Parker R; Smith A; van der Windt DA Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 6(1):88. PubMed ID: 28427475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. Methley AM; Campbell S; Chew-Graham C; McNally R; Cheraghi-Sohi S BMC Health Serv Res; 2014 Nov; 14():579. PubMed ID: 25413154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]