663 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24906040)
21. Severe chronic pancreatitis versus suspected pancreatic disease: dynamic MR cholangiopancreatography after secretin stimulation.
Manfredi R; Costamagna G; Brizi MG; Maresca G; Vecchioli A; Colagrande C; Marano P
Radiology; 2000 Mar; 214(3):849-55. PubMed ID: 10715057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Magnetic resonance study of the pancreatic duct.
Calvo MM; Calderón A; Heras I; Durán M; Orive V; Cabriada J; Astigarraga E
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 1999 Apr; 91(4):287-96. PubMed ID: 10348928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Miss rate of pancreas divisum by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in clinical practice.
Carnes ML; Romagnuolo J; Cotton PB
Pancreas; 2008 Aug; 37(2):151-3. PubMed ID: 18665075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Pancreatic cancer detection with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective controlled study.
Adamek HE; Albert J; Breer H; Weitz M; Schilling D; Riemann JF
Lancet; 2000 Jul; 356(9225):190-3. PubMed ID: 10963196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases.
Lomanto D; Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Mazzocchi P; Fiocca F; Lezoche E; Passariello R; Speranza V
Am J Surg; 1997 Jul; 174(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 9240949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Chronic pancreatitis: MRCP versus ERCP for quantitative caliber measurement and qualitative evaluation.
Tamura R; Ishibashi T; Takahashi S
Radiology; 2006 Mar; 238(3):920-8. PubMed ID: 16424235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. MRCP of congenital pancreaticobiliary malformation.
Kamisawa T; Tu Y; Egawa N; Tsuruta K; Okamoto A; Kamata N
Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 16680507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnostic value of MRCP and indications for ERCP.
Sakai Y; Tsuyuguchi T; Tsuchiya S; Sugiyama H; Miyakawa K; Ebara M; Saisho H; Yokosuka O
Hepatogastroenterology; 2007 Dec; 54(80):2212-5. PubMed ID: 18265635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Diagnostic role of secretin-enhanced MRCP in patients with unsuccessful ERCP.
Czakó L; Takács T; Morvay Z; Csernay L; Lonovics J
World J Gastroenterol; 2004 Oct; 10(20):3034-8. PubMed ID: 15378788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis: analysis of patients with negative MRCP.
Chang JH; Lee IS; Lim YS; Jung SH; Paik CN; Kim HK; Kim TH; Kim CW; Han SW; Choi MG; Jung IS
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2012 Feb; 47(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 22149906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the imaging of the axial biliary tree in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis.
Mofidi R; Lee AC; Madhavan KK; Garden OJ; Parks RW
Pancreatology; 2008; 8(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 18253063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for suspected bilio-pancreatic disease: should the endoscopist take a second look?
Wehrmann T; Eckardt AJ; Riphaus A
Z Gastroenterol; 2013 Feb; 51(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 23417365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Controversial issues in biliary pancreatitis: when should we perform MRCP and ERCP?
Cavdar F; Yildar M; Tellioğlu G; Kara M; Tilki M; Titiz Mİ
Pancreatology; 2014; 14(5):411-4. PubMed ID: 25200693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Hintze RE; Adler A; Veltzke W; Abou-Rebyeh H; Hammerstingl R; Vogl T; Felix R
Endoscopy; 1997 Mar; 29(3):182-7. PubMed ID: 9201467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pancreatic diseases: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography.
Ueno E; Takada Y; Yoshida I; Toda J; Sugiura T; Toki F
Pancreas; 1998 Apr; 16(3):418-26. PubMed ID: 9548689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Use of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Clinical Practice: Not as Good as We Once Thought.
Aydelotte JD; Ali J; Huynh PT; Coopwood TB; Uecker JM; Brown CV
J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Jul; 221(1):215-9. PubMed ID: 26047762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Acinarization (parenchymal blush) observed during secretin-enhanced MRCP: clinical implications.
Sandrasegaran K; Bodanapally U; Cote GA; Benzinger S; Patel AA; Akisik FM; Sherman S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):607-14. PubMed ID: 25148164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Evaluation of MRCP compared to ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic duct].
Hatano S; Kondoh S; Akiyama T; Okita K
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2874-9. PubMed ID: 9847613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Secretin-stimulated MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP): visualization of the normal pancreatic duct in comparison with ERCP].
Heverhagen JT; Battmann A; Kirsch M; Eissele R; Klose KJ; Wagner HJ
Rofo; 2002 Sep; 174(9):1154-7. PubMed ID: 12221575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
