188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24906175)
1. Fast Bayesian parameter estimation for stochastic logistic growth models.
Heydari J; Lawless C; Lydall DA; Wilkinson DJ
Biosystems; 2014 Aug; 122():55-72. PubMed ID: 24906175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inferring extrinsic noise from single-cell gene expression data using approximate Bayesian computation.
Lenive O; W Kirk PD; H Stumpf MP
BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Aug; 10(1):81. PubMed ID: 27549182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inference for reaction networks using the linear noise approximation.
Fearnhead P; Giagos V; Sherlock C
Biometrics; 2014 Jun; 70(2):457-66. PubMed ID: 24467590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-time analytic approximation of large stochastic oscillators: Simulation, analysis and inference.
Minas G; Rand DA
PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Jul; 13(7):e1005676. PubMed ID: 28742083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Parametric Bayesian filters for nonlinear stochastic dynamical systems: a survey.
Stano P; Lendek Z; Braaksma J; Babuska R; de Keizer C; den Dekker AJ
IEEE Trans Cybern; 2013 Dec; 43(6):1607-24. PubMed ID: 23757593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bayesian inference for stochastic kinetic models using a diffusion approximation.
Golightly A; Wilkinson DJ
Biometrics; 2005 Sep; 61(3):781-8. PubMed ID: 16135029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parameter inference for stochastic biochemical models from perturbation experiments parallelised at the single cell level.
Davidović A; Chait R; Batt G; Ruess J
PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Mar; 18(3):e1009950. PubMed ID: 35303737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bayesian Inference of Stochastic Dynamic Models Using Early-Rejection Methods Based on Sequential Stochastic Simulations.
Zhang H; Chen J; Tian T
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2022; 19(3):1484-1494. PubMed ID: 33216717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of Monte Carlo-based Bayesian parameter estimation methods for stochastic models of genetic networks.
Mariño IP; Zaikin A; Míguez J
PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182015. PubMed ID: 28797087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trajectory inference and parameter estimation in stochastic models with temporally aggregated data.
Folia MM; Rattray M
Stat Comput; 2018; 28(5):1053-1072. PubMed ID: 30147250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimation of nonlinear mixed-effects continuous-time models using the continuous-discrete extended Kalman filter.
Ou L; Hunter MD; Lu Z; Stifter CA; Chow SM
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Nov; 76(3):462-490. PubMed ID: 37674379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) gives exact results under the assumption of model error.
Wilkinson RD
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 May; 12(2):129-41. PubMed ID: 23652634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Population stochastic modelling (PSM)--an R package for mixed-effects models based on stochastic differential equations.
Klim S; Mortensen SB; Kristensen NR; Overgaard RV; Madsen H
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Jun; 94(3):279-89. PubMed ID: 19268387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deterministic inference for stochastic systems using multiple shooting and a linear noise approximation for the transition probabilities.
Zimmer C; Sahle S
IET Syst Biol; 2015 Oct; 9(5):181-92. PubMed ID: 26405142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Linear Noise Approximation for Spatially Dependent Biochemical Networks.
Lötstedt P
Bull Math Biol; 2019 Aug; 81(8):2873-2901. PubMed ID: 29644520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-linear mixed-effects models with stochastic differential equations: implementation of an estimation algorithm.
Overgaard RV; Jonsson N; Tornøe CW; Madsen H
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2005 Feb; 32(1):85-107. PubMed ID: 16175312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How reliable is the linear noise approximation of gene regulatory networks?
Thomas P; Matuschek H; Grima R
BMC Genomics; 2013; 14 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S5. PubMed ID: 24266939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How noisy adaptation of neurons shapes interspike interval histograms and correlations.
Schwalger T; Fisch K; Benda J; Lindner B
PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Dec; 6(12):e1001026. PubMed ID: 21187900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exact Gradients Improve Parameter Estimation in Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models with Stochastic Dynamics.
Olafsdottir HK; Leander J; Almquist J; Jirstrand M
AAPS J; 2018 Aug; 20(5):88. PubMed ID: 30069613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
