BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24906803)

  • 1. hsphase: an R package for pedigree reconstruction, detection of recombination events, phasing and imputation of half-sib family groups.
    Ferdosi MH; Kinghorn BP; van der Werf JH; Lee SH; Gondro C
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Jun; 15():172. PubMed ID: 24906803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of recombination events, haplotype reconstruction and imputation of sires using half-sib SNP genotypes.
    Ferdosi MH; Kinghorn BP; van der Werf JH; Gondro C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Feb; 46(1):11. PubMed ID: 24495596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recombination locations and rates in beef cattle assessed from parent-offspring pairs.
    Weng ZQ; Saatchi M; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 May; 46(1):34. PubMed ID: 24885305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A combined long-range phasing and long haplotype imputation method to impute phase for SNP genotypes.
    Hickey JM; Kinghorn BP; Tier B; Wilson JF; Dunstan N; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2011 Mar; 43(1):12. PubMed ID: 21388557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breeds.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Kijas JW; van der Werf JH
    Anim Genet; 2012 Feb; 43(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 22221027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of genotype imputation in Nelore cattle.
    Carvalheiro R; Boison SA; Neves HH; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS; Utsunomiya YT; O'Brien AM; Sölkner J; McEwan JC; Van Tassell CP; Sonstegard TS; Garcia JF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):69. PubMed ID: 25927950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Imputation of missing genotypes from sparse to high density using long-range phasing.
    Daetwyler HD; Wiggans GR; Hayes BJ; Woolliams JA; Goddard ME
    Genetics; 2011 Sep; 189(1):317-27. PubMed ID: 21705746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic selection using low density marker panels with application to a sire line in pigs.
    Wellmann R; Preuß S; Tholen E; Heinkel J; Wimmers K; Bennewitz J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Jul; 45(1):28. PubMed ID: 23895218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A phasing and imputation method for pedigreed populations that results in a single-stage genomic evaluation.
    Hickey JM; Kinghorn BP; Tier B; van der Werf JH; Cleveland MA
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Jun; 44(1):9. PubMed ID: 22462519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combinatorial Conflicting Homozygosity (CCH) analysis enables the rapid identification of shared genomic regions in the presence of multiple phenocopies.
    Levine AP; Connor TM; Oygar DD; Neild GH; Segal AW; Maxwell PH; Gale DP
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Mar; 16(1):163. PubMed ID: 25888400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A strategy to improve phasing of whole-genome sequenced individuals through integration of familial information from dense genotype panels.
    Faux P; Druet T
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 May; 49(1):46. PubMed ID: 28511677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of different algorithms for phasing haplotypes using Holstein cattle genotypes and pedigree data.
    Miar Y; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Apr; 100(4):2837-2849. PubMed ID: 28161175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. AlphaFamImpute: high-accuracy imputation in full-sib families from genotype-by-sequencing data.
    Whalen A; Gorjanc G; Hickey JM
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Aug; 36(15):4369-4371. PubMed ID: 32467963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Imputation of non-genotyped sheep from the genotypes of their mates and resulting progeny.
    Berry DP; McHugh N; Randles S; Wall E; McDermott K; Sargolzaei M; O'Brien AC
    Animal; 2018 Feb; 12(2):191-198. PubMed ID: 28712375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of Mendelian inconsistencies between SNP and pedigree information of sibs.
    Calus MP; Mulder HA; Bastiaansen JW
    Genet Sel Evol; 2011 Oct; 43(1):34. PubMed ID: 21988752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Covariance Between Genotypic Effects and its Use for Genomic Inference in Half-Sib Families.
    Wittenburg D; Teuscher F; Klosa J; Reinsch N
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Sep; 6(9):2761-72. PubMed ID: 27402363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Benchmarking phasing software with a whole-genome sequenced cattle pedigree.
    Oget-Ebrad C; Kadri NK; Moreira GCM; Karim L; Coppieters W; Georges M; Druet T
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Feb; 23(1):130. PubMed ID: 35164677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imputation of ungenotyped parental genotypes in dairy and beef cattle from progeny genotypes.
    Berry DP; McParland S; Kearney JF; Sargolzaei M; Mullen MP
    Animal; 2014 Jun; 8(6):895-903. PubMed ID: 24840560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discovery of hidden pedigree errors combining genomic information with the genomic relationship matrix in Texel sheep.
    Kaseja K; Mucha S; Yates J; Smith E; Banos G; Conington J
    Animal; 2022 Mar; 16(3):100468. PubMed ID: 35190320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A mating advice system in dairy cattle incorporating genomic information.
    Carthy TR; McCarthy J; Berry DP
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Sep; 102(9):8210-8220. PubMed ID: 31229287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.