423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24907286)
1. Examination of the Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Neurocognitive Test Battery.
Nakayama Y; Covassin T; Schatz P; Nogle S; Kovan J
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Aug; 42(8):2000-5. PubMed ID: 24907286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of validity criteria on Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) test-retest reliability among high school athletes.
Brett BL; Solomon GS
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2017 Apr; 39(3):286-295. PubMed ID: 27585635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. One-year test-retest reliability of the online version of ImPACT in high school athletes.
Elbin RJ; Schatz P; Covassin T
Am J Sports Med; 2011 Nov; 39(11):2319-24. PubMed ID: 21841066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the suitability of the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) computerized neurocognitive battery for short-term, serial assessment of neurocognitive functioning.
Elbin RJ; Fazio-Sumrok V; Anderson MN; D'Amico NR; Said A; Grossel A; Schatz P; Lipinski D; Womble M
J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Apr; 62():138-141. PubMed ID: 30472342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short-term test-retest reliability of the ImPACT in healthy young athletes.
O'Brien AM; Casey JE; Salmon RM
Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2018; 7(3):208-216. PubMed ID: 28631965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Test-retest, retest, and retest: Growth curve models of repeat testing with Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT).
Maerlender AC; Masterson CJ; James TD; Beckwith J; Brolinson PG; Crisco J; Duma S; Flashman LA; Greenwald R; Rowson S; Wilcox B; McAllister TW
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2016 Oct; 38(8):869-74. PubMed ID: 27266563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of a Computerized Neurocognitive Test in Baseline Concussion Testing of High School Athletes.
MacDonald J; Duerson D
Clin J Sport Med; 2015 Jul; 25(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 25061807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The test-retest reliability of three computerized neurocognitive tests used in the assessment of sport concussion.
Resch JE; Schneider MW; Munro Cullum C
Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt A):31-38. PubMed ID: 28935224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating the test-retest reliability of symptom indices associated with the ImPACT post-concussion symptom scale (PCSS).
Merritt VC; Bradson ML; Meyer JE; Arnett PA
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2018 May; 40(4):377-388. PubMed ID: 28728465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Concussion Test: CNS Vital Signs.
Littleton AC; Register-Mihalik JK; Guskiewicz KM
Sports Health; 2015; 7(5):443-7. PubMed ID: 26502421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Baseline Neurocognitive Performance and Clearance for Athletes to Return to Contact.
Asken BM; Clugston JR; Snyder AR; Bauer RM
J Athl Train; 2017 Jan; 52(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 27905859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Clinical Utility of a Concussion Rebaseline Protocol After Concussion Recovery.
Lynall RC; Schmidt JD; Mihalik JP; Guskiewicz KM
Clin J Sport Med; 2016 Jul; 26(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 26580474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY AND RELIABLE CHANGE INDEX OF MOBILE APPLICATION NEUROCOGNITIVE TEST AMONG MIDDLE AND HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETES.
Hashida K; Lee J; Furutani TM; Tsushima W; Tamura K
J Athl Train; 2023 Jul; 2023(preprint):0. PubMed ID: 37459377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Concussion symptoms and neurocognitive performance of high school and college athletes who incur multiple concussions.
Covassin T; Moran R; Wilhelm K
Am J Sports Med; 2013 Dec; 41(12):2885-9. PubMed ID: 23959963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of baseline and post-concussion ImPACT test scores in young athletes with stimulant-treated and untreated ADHD.
Gardner RM; Yengo-Kahn A; Bonfield CM; Solomon GS
Phys Sportsmed; 2017 Feb; 45(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 27736285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability and Validity of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-3 (SCAT3) in High School and Collegiate Athletes.
Chin EY; Nelson LD; Barr WB; McCrory P; McCrea MA
Am J Sports Med; 2016 Sep; 44(9):2276-85. PubMed ID: 27281276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An Examination of Adolescent Athletes and Nonathletes on Baseline Neuropsychological Test Scores.
Tomczyk CP; Mormile M; Wittenberg MS; Langdon JL; Hunt TN
J Athl Train; 2018 Apr; 53(4):404-409. PubMed ID: 29543036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective, Head-to-Head Study of Three Computerized Neurocognitive Assessment Tools (CNTs): Reliability and Validity for the Assessment of Sport-Related Concussion.
Nelson LD; LaRoche AA; Pfaller AY; Lerner EB; Hammeke TA; Randolph C; Barr WB; Guskiewicz K; McCrea MA
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2016 Jan; 22(1):24-37. PubMed ID: 26714883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Utility of VOMS, SCAT3, and ImPACT Baseline Evaluations for Acute Concussion Identification in Collegiate Athletes: Findings From the NCAA-DoD Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Consortium.
Ferris LM; Kontos AP; Eagle SR; Elbin RJ; Collins MW; Mucha A; McAllister TW; Broglio SP; McCrea M; Pasquina PF; Port NL
Am J Sports Med; 2022 Mar; 50(4):1106-1119. PubMed ID: 35179972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. One year test-retest reliability of neurocognitive baseline scores in 10- to 12-year olds.
Moser RS; Schatz P; Grosner E; Kollias K
Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2017; 6(2):166-171. PubMed ID: 27182767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
