These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24907817)

  • 1. Nonuniform temporal weighting of interaural time differences in 500 Hz tones.
    Stecker GC; Bibee JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):3541-7. PubMed ID: 24907817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal weighting of binaural information at low frequencies: Discrimination of dynamic interaural time and level differences.
    Diedesch AC; Stecker GC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):125-33. PubMed ID: 26233013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spectrotemporal weighting of binaural cues: Effects of a diotic interferer on discrimination of dynamic interaural differences.
    Bibee JM; Stecker GC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Oct; 140(4):2584. PubMed ID: 27794286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of envelope shape on the lateralization of amplitude-modulated, low-frequency sound.
    Haywood NR; Undurraga JA; McAlpine D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 May; 149(5):3133. PubMed ID: 34241105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rate dependent neural responses of interaural-time-difference cues in fine-structure and envelope.
    Hu H; Ewert SD; Kollmeier B; Vickers D
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17104. PubMed ID: 38680894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory cortex responses to interaural time differences in the envelope of low-frequency sound, recorded with MEG in young and older listeners.
    Ross B
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():22-39. PubMed ID: 30265860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating the perceptual weighting of interaural time difference cues in amplitude modulated binaural beats.
    Haywood NR; McAlpine D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Aug; 148(2):EL185. PubMed ID: 32872987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Independent or integrated processing of interaural time and level differences in human auditory cortex?
    Altmann CF; Terada S; Kashino M; Goto K; Mima T; Fukuyama H; Furukawa S
    Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():121-7. PubMed ID: 24709274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-frequency neurons in the inferior colliculus that are sensitive to interaural delays of amplitude-modulated tones: evidence for dual binaural influences.
    Batra R; Kuwada S; Stanford TR
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Jul; 70(1):64-80. PubMed ID: 8395589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal weighting functions for interaural time and level differences. III. Temporal weighting for lateral position judgments.
    Stecker GC; Ostreicher JD; Brown AD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1242-52. PubMed ID: 23927122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of reference interaural time and intensity differences on binaural performance in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Koehnke J; Culotta CP; Hawley ML; Colburn HS
    Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):331-53. PubMed ID: 8549890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reweighting of Binaural Localization Cues in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
    Klingel M; Laback B
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Feb; 23(1):119-136. PubMed ID: 34812980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal weighting functions for interaural time and level differences. II. The effect of binaurally synchronous temporal jitter.
    Brown AD; Stecker GC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):293-300. PubMed ID: 21303010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. II. Characteristic delays and comparison with responses in the medial superior olive.
    Joris PX
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Oct; 76(4):2137-56. PubMed ID: 8899590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensitivity to Envelope Interaural Time Differences at High Modulation Rates.
    Monaghan JJ; Bleeck S; McAlpine D
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Blind people are more sensitive than sighted people to binaural sound-location cues, particularly inter-aural level differences.
    Nilsson ME; Schenkman BN
    Hear Res; 2016 Feb; 332():223-232. PubMed ID: 26433052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Onset- and offset-specific effects in interaural level difference discrimination.
    Stecker GC; Brown AD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1573-80. PubMed ID: 22978886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal weighting functions for interaural time and level differences. IV. Effects of carrier frequency.
    Stecker GC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3221. PubMed ID: 25480069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spectrotemporal window of binaural integration in auditory object formation.
    Hsieh IH; Liu JW; Liang ZJ
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():155-167. PubMed ID: 30388573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the variation of interaural time differences with frequency.
    Benichoux V; Rébillat M; Brette R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1810. PubMed ID: 27106329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.