BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24907940)

  • 1. Whole-body [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI vs. PET/CT in the assessment of bone lesions in oncological patients: initial results.
    Beiderwellen K; Huebner M; Heusch P; Grueneisen J; Ruhlmann V; Nensa F; Kuehl H; Umutlu L; Rosenbaum-Krumme S; Lauenstein TC
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Aug; 24(8):2023-30. PubMed ID: 24907940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of whole-body integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR in comparison to PET/CT for evaluation of malignant bone lesions.
    Eiber M; Takei T; Souvatzoglou M; Mayerhoefer ME; Fürst S; Gaertner FC; Loeffelbein DJ; Rummeny EJ; Ziegler SI; Schwaiger M; Beer AJ
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 55(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 24309383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 18F-FDG-PET/MR increases diagnostic confidence in detection of bone metastases compared with 18F-FDG-PET/CT.
    Samarin A; Hüllner M; Queiroz MA; Stolzmann P; Burger IA; von Schulthess G; Veit-Haibach P
    Nucl Med Commun; 2015 Dec; 36(12):1165-73. PubMed ID: 26397999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Depiction and characterization of liver lesions in whole body [¹⁸F]-FDG PET/MRI.
    Beiderwellen K; Gomez B; Buchbender C; Hartung V; Poeppel TD; Nensa F; Kuehl H; Bockisch A; Lauenstein TC
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e669-75. PubMed ID: 24011443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hybrid imaging for detection of carcinoma of unknown primary: A preliminary comparison trial of whole-body PET/MRI versus PET/CT.
    Ruhlmann V; Ruhlmann M; Bellendorf A; Grueneisen J; Sawicki LM; Grafe H; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Umutlu L
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):1941-1947. PubMed ID: 27776644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI vs. PET/CT for whole-body staging in patients with recurrent malignancies of the female pelvis: initial results.
    Beiderwellen K; Grueneisen J; Ruhlmann V; Buderath P; Aktas B; Heusch P; Kraff O; Forsting M; Lauenstein TC; Umutlu L
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Jan; 42(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 25223420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
    Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and CT in whole-body staging of recurrent breast cancer.
    Sawicki LM; Grueneisen J; Schaarschmidt BM; Buchbender C; Nagarajah J; Umutlu L; Antoch G; Kinner S
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Feb; 85(2):459-65. PubMed ID: 26781152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Supplemental value of diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) technique to whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in detection of bone metastases from thyroid cancer.
    Sakurai Y; Kawai H; Iwano S; Ito S; Ogawa H; Naganawa S
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2013 Jun; 57(3):297-305. PubMed ID: 23721138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "One-stop-shop" staging: should we prefer FDG-PET/CT or MRI for the detection of bone metastases?
    Heusner T; Gölitz P; Hamami M; Eberhardt W; Esser S; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jun; 78(3):430-5. PubMed ID: 19945240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening for bone metastases: whole-body MRI using a 32-channel system versus dual-modality PET-CT.
    Schmidt GP; Schoenberg SO; Schmid R; Stahl R; Tiling R; Becker CR; Reiser MF; Baur-Melnyk A
    Eur Radiol; 2007 Apr; 17(4):939-49. PubMed ID: 16951929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A prospective comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and whole-body planar radiographs in the assessment of bone disease in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
    Zamagni E; Nanni C; Patriarca F; Englaro E; Castellucci P; Geatti O; Tosi P; Tacchetti P; Cangini D; Perrone G; Ceccolini M; Brioli A; Buttignol S; Fanin R; Salizzoni E; Baccarani M; Fanti S; Cavo M
    Haematologica; 2007 Jan; 92(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 17229635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative Performance of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in Detection and Characterization of Pulmonary Lesions in 121 Oncologic Patients.
    Sawicki LM; Grueneisen J; Buchbender C; Schaarschmidt BM; Gomez B; Ruhlmann V; Wetter A; Umutlu L; Antoch G; Heusch P
    J Nucl Med; 2016 Apr; 57(4):582-6. PubMed ID: 26742715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simultaneous 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/MRI in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: initial results.
    Beiderwellen KJ; Poeppel TD; Hartung-Knemeyer V; Buchbender C; Kuehl H; Bockisch A; Lauenstein TC
    Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):273-9. PubMed ID: 23493121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [(18)F]FDG PET/CT outperforms [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI in differentiated thyroid cancer.
    Vrachimis A; Burg MC; Wenning C; Allkemper T; Weckesser M; Schäfers M; Stegger L
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Feb; 43(2):212-220. PubMed ID: 26419851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the assessment of bone involvement in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: preliminary results.
    Nanni C; Zamagni E; Farsad M; Castellucci P; Tosi P; Cangini D; Salizzoni E; Canini R; Cavo M; Fanti S
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 May; 33(5):525-31. PubMed ID: 16453155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients.
    Bruckmann NM; Kirchner J; Umutlu L; Fendler WP; Seifert R; Herrmann K; Bittner AK; Hoffmann O; Mohrmann S; Antke C; Schimmöller L; Ingenwerth M; Breuckmann K; Stang A; Buchbender C; Antoch G; Sawicki LM
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Nov; 31(11):8714-8724. PubMed ID: 33912991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of FDG-PET/CT and bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastases in breast cancer.
    Hahn S; Heusner T; Kümmel S; Köninger A; Nagarajah J; Müller S; Boy C; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Stahl A
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Nov; 52(9):1009-14. PubMed ID: 21969709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective Comparison of 99mTc-MDP Scintigraphy, Combined 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT, and Whole-Body MRI in Patients with Breast and Prostate Cancer.
    Minamimoto R; Loening A; Jamali M; Barkhodari A; Mosci C; Jackson T; Obara P; Taviani V; Gambhir SS; Vasanawala S; Iagaru A
    J Nucl Med; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1862-8. PubMed ID: 26405167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of PET and MR datasets in integrated 18F-FDG PET/MRI: A comparison of different MR sequences for whole-body restaging of breast cancer patients.
    Grueneisen J; Sawicki LM; Wetter A; Kirchner J; Kinner S; Aktas B; Forsting M; Ruhlmann V; Umutlu L
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Apr; 89():14-19. PubMed ID: 28267530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.