These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24908048)

  • 1. Human ability in identification of location and pulse number for electrocutaneous stimulation applied on the forearm.
    Geng B; Jensen W
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Jun; 11():97. PubMed ID: 24908048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of the stimulation frequency on closed-loop control with electrotactile feedback.
    Paredes LP; Dosen S; Rattay F; Graimann B; Farina D
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Apr; 12():35. PubMed ID: 25889752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of multiple perceptual qualities of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for evoked tactile sensation in forearm amputees.
    Zhang J; Hao M; Yang F; Liang W; Sun A; Chou CH; Lan N
    J Neural Eng; 2022 Apr; 19(2):. PubMed ID: 35320789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of sensation evoked by electrocutaneous stimulation on forearm in nondisabled subjects.
    Geng B; Yoshida K; Petrini L; Jensen W
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 22773530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Myoelectric intuitive control and transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the forearm for vibrotactile sensation feedback applied to a 3D printed prosthetic hand.
    Germany EI; Pino EJ; Aqueveque PE
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():5046-5050. PubMed ID: 28269402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vibrotactile grasping force and hand aperture feedback for myoelectric forearm prosthesis users.
    Witteveen HJ; Rietman HS; Veltink PH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Jun; 39(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 24567348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensory feedback from a prosthetic hand based on air-mediated pressure from the hand to the forearm skin.
    Antfolk C; Björkman A; Frank SO; Sebelius F; Lundborg G; Rosen B
    J Rehabil Med; 2012 Jul; 44(8):702-7. PubMed ID: 22729800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Localization of electrocutaneous stimuli on the fingers and forearm: effects of electrode configuration and body axis.
    Higashiyama A; Hayashi M
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jul; 54(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 8351181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transfer of tactile input from an artificial hand to the forearm: experiments in amputees and able-bodied volunteers.
    Antfolk C; Cipriani C; Carrozza MC; Balkenius C; Björkman A; Lundborg G; Rosén B; Sebelius F
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2013 May; 8(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 22928878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of evoked tactile sensation in forearm amputees with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.
    Chai G; Sui X; Li S; He L; Lan N
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Dec; 12(6):066002. PubMed ID: 26401550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Touch on predefined areas on the forearm can be associated with specific fingers: Towards a new principle for sensory feedback in hand prostheses.
    Wijk U; Svensson P; Antfolk C; Carlsson IK; Björkman A; Rosén B
    J Rehabil Med; 2019 Mar; 51(3):209-216. PubMed ID: 30815704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electric pulse frequency and magnitude of perceived sensation during electrocutaneous forearm stimulation.
    Jelinek HF; McIntyre R
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Sep; 91(9):1378-82. PubMed ID: 20801255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A third arm - Design of a bypass prosthesis enabling incorporation.
    Wilson AW; Blustein DH; Sensinger JW
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1381-1386. PubMed ID: 28814013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discriminability of multiple cutaneous and proprioceptive hand percepts evoked by intraneural stimulation with Utah slanted electrode arrays in human amputees.
    Page DM; George JA; Wendelken SM; Davis TS; Kluger DT; Hutchinson DT; Clark GA
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 Jan; 18(1):12. PubMed ID: 33478534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impacts of selected stimulation patterns on the perception threshold in electrocutaneous stimulation.
    Geng B; Yoshida K; Jensen W
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2011 Feb; 8():9. PubMed ID: 21306616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psycho-physiological assessment of a prosthetic hand sensory feedback system based on an auditory display: a preliminary study.
    Gonzalez J; Soma H; Sekine M; Yu W
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2012 Jun; 9():33. PubMed ID: 22682425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. HapPro: A Wearable Haptic Device for Proprioceptive Feedback.
    Rossi M; Bianchi M; Battaglia E; Catalano MG; Bicchi A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2019 Jan; 66(1):138-149. PubMed ID: 29993527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gender effect on discrimination of location and frequency in surface electrical stimulation.
    Geng B; Paramanathan SA; Pedersen KF; Lauridsen MV; Gade J; Lontis R; Jensen W
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():2071-4. PubMed ID: 26736695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SmartHand tactile display: a new concept for providing sensory feedback in hand prostheses.
    Antfolk C; Balkenius C; Rosén B; Lundborg G; Sebelius F
    Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 2010 Feb; 44(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 20158428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hand-opening feedback for myoelectric forearm prostheses: performance in virtual grasping tasks influenced by different levels of distraction.
    Witteveen HJ; de Rond L; Rietman JS; Veltink PH
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(10):1517-26. PubMed ID: 23516055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.