230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24908523)
1. A randomized trial comparing skin closure in cesarean section: interrupted suture with nylon vs subcuticular suture with No '1' polyfilament.
Shrestha A; Napit J; Neupane B; Sedhai LB
J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2013 Sep; 11(25):240-3. PubMed ID: 24908523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures.
Rousseau JA; Girard K; Turcot-Lemay L; Thomas N
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 200(3):265.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19254586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
Zaki MN; Wing DA; McNulty JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery.
Tuuli MG; Stout MJ; Martin S; Rampersad RM; Cahill AG; Macones GA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):490.e1-5. PubMed ID: 27179440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture.
Frishman GN; Schwartz T; Hogan JW
J Reprod Med; 1997 Oct; 42(10):627-30. PubMed ID: 9350017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery.
Basha SL; Rochon ML; Quiñones JN; Coassolo KM; Rust OA; Smulian JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 203(3):285.e1-8. PubMed ID: 20816153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis.
Mackeen AD; Schuster M; Berghella V
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):621.e1-10. PubMed ID: 25530592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome in a randomized study of cesarean skin closure.
Fleisher J; Khalifeh A; Pettker C; Berghella V; Dabbish N; Mackeen AD
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3830-3835. PubMed ID: 29739243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with 'staples' or 'subcuticular sutures' in emergency cesarean section.
Sharma C; Verma A; Soni A; Thusoo M; Mahajan VK; Verma S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Oct; 290(4):655-9. PubMed ID: 24816689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Figueroa D; Jauk VC; Szychowski JM; Garner R; Biggio JR; Andrews WW; Hauth J; Tita AT
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 121(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23262925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Skin closure at cesarean delivery, glue vs subcuticular sutures: a randomized controlled trial.
Daykan Y; Sharon-Weiner M; Pasternak Y; Tzadikevitch-Geffen K; Markovitch O; Sukenik-Halevy R; Biron-Shental T
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 216(4):406.e1-406.e5. PubMed ID: 28153666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cesarean wound closure in body mass index 40 or greater comparing suture to staples: a randomized clinical trial.
Rodel RL; Gray KM; Quiner TE; Bodea Braescu A; Gerkin R; Perlow JH
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jan; 3(1):100271. PubMed ID: 33451603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Superficial incisional surgical site infection rate after cesarean section in obese women: a randomized controlled trial of subcuticular versus interrupted skin suturing.
Ibrahim MI; Moustafa GF; Al-Hamid AS; Hussein MR
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 May; 289(5):981-6. PubMed ID: 24272023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis.
Wang H; Hong S; Teng H; Qiao L; Yin H
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(22):3705-11. PubMed ID: 26785886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Subcuticular interrupted versus continuous skin suturing in elective cesarean section in obese women: a randomized controlled trial.
Maged AM; Mohesen MN; Elhalwagy A; Abdelaal H; Almohamady M; Abdellatif AA; Alsawaf A; Malek KA; Nabil H; Fahmy RM; Wageih H
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Dec; 32(24):4114-4119. PubMed ID: 29804486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cosmetic outcomes of various skin closure methods following cesarean delivery: a randomized trial.
Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Gottardi A; Cherubino M; Uccella S; Valdatta L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 203(1):36.e1-8. PubMed ID: 20417924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.
Madsen AM; Dow ML; Lohse CM; Tessmer-Tuck JA
BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Staples vs subcuticular sutures for skin closure at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clay FS; Walsh CA; Walsh SR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 May; 204(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 21195384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized trial between different suture materials (polydioxanone vs. poliglecaprone 25) and different suturing techniques (running subcuticular suture alone vs. with running horizontal mattress) in prevention of hypertrophic scar development in median sternotomy wound.
Homvises B
J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Aug; 97 Suppl 8():S88-94. PubMed ID: 25518299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery with poliglecaprone-25 vs polyglactin-910: a randomized controlled trial.
Sharma C; Sharma S; Soni A
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Feb; 6(2):101256. PubMed ID: 38109995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
