BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24908592)

  • 1. The efficacy of ultrasonography for the detection of renal stone.
    Kanno T; Kubota M; Sakamoto H; Nishiyama R; Okada T; Higashi Y; Yamada H
    Urology; 2014 Aug; 84(2):285-8. PubMed ID: 24908592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determining the efficacy of ultrasonography for the detection of ureteral stone.
    Kanno T; Kubota M; Sakamoto H; Nishiyama R; Okada T; Higashi Y; Yamada H
    Urology; 2014 Sep; 84(3):533-7. PubMed ID: 25168527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Utility of the Kidneys-ureters-bladder Radiograph as the Sole Imaging Modality and Its Combination With Ultrasonography for the Detection of Renal Stones.
    Kanno T; Kubota M; Funada S; Okada T; Higashi Y; Yamada H
    Urology; 2017 Jun; 104():40-44. PubMed ID: 28341578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrasonography Significantly Overestimates Stone Size When Compared to Low-dose, Noncontrast Computed Tomography.
    Sternberg KM; Eisner B; Larson T; Hernandez N; Han J; Pais VM
    Urology; 2016 Sep; 95():67-71. PubMed ID: 27289025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital Tomosynthesis: A Viable Alternative to Noncontrast Computed Tomography for the Follow-Up of Nephrolithiasis?
    Cabrera FJ; Kaplan AG; Youssef RF; Tsivian M; Shin RH; Scales CD; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
    J Endourol; 2016 Apr; 30(4):366-70. PubMed ID: 27078715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Renal tract calculi: comparison of stone size on plain radiography and noncontrast spiral CT scan.
    Dundee P; Bouchier-Hayes D; Haxhimolla H; Dowling R; Costello A
    J Endourol; 2006 Dec; 20(12):1005-9. PubMed ID: 17206892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of Residual Stone Fragments After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.
    Danilovic A; Cavalanti A; Rocha BA; Traxer O; Torricelli FCM; Marchini GS; Mazzucchi E; Srougi M
    J Endourol; 2018 Dec; 32(12):1108-1113. PubMed ID: 30398369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Limitations to ultrasound in the detection and measurement of urinary tract calculi.
    Ray AA; Ghiculete D; Pace KT; Honey RJ
    Urology; 2010 Aug; 76(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 20206970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. US for detecting renal calculi with nonenhanced CT as a reference standard.
    Fowler KA; Locken JA; Duchesne JH; Williamson MR
    Radiology; 2002 Jan; 222(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 11756713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of ultrasonography for renal stone detection and size determination: is it good enough for management decisions?
    Ganesan V; De S; Greene D; Torricelli FC; Monga M
    BJU Int; 2017 Mar; 119(3):464-469. PubMed ID: 27459091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of ultrasonography in detecting urinary tract calculi compared to CT scan.
    Ahmed F; Askarpour MR; Eslahi A; Nikbakht HA; Jafari SH; Hassanpour A; Makarem A; Salama H; Ayoub A
    Res Rep Urol; 2018; 10():199-203. PubMed ID: 30510920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study.
    Ouzaid I; Al-qahtani S; Dominique S; Hupertan V; Fernandez P; Hermieu JF; Delmas V; Ravery V
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E438-42. PubMed ID: 22372937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy; sensitivities of different imaging methods in renal stone detection.
    Lehtoranta K; Mankinen P; Taari K; Rannikko S; Lehtonen T; Salo J
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1995; 84(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 7645910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Limitations of ultrasonography in the evaluation of urolithiasis: a correlation with computed tomography.
    Viprakasit DP; Sawyer MD; Herrell SD; Miller NL
    J Endourol; 2012 Mar; 26(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 22010975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Limitations of noncontrast CT for measuring ureteral stones.
    Van Appledorn S; Ball AJ; Patel VR; Kim S; Leveillee RJ
    J Endourol; 2003 Dec; 17(10):851-4; discussion 854. PubMed ID: 14744347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of sonography for detecting renal stone: comparison with CT.
    Ulusan S; Koc Z; Tokmak N
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2007 Jun; 35(5):256-61. PubMed ID: 17373690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Postshockwave lithotripsy outcome evaluation in ureteral stones: comparison between noncontrast computed tomography and plain abdominal radiography.
    Soydan H; Akyol I; Senkul T; Ates F; Uguz S; Yilmaz O; Baykal K
    J Endourol; 2012 Jul; 26(7):803-6. PubMed ID: 22250983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated volumetric assessment by noncontrast computed tomography in the surveillance of nephrolithiasis.
    Patel SR; Wells S; Ruma J; King S; Lubner MG; Nakada SY; Pickhardt PJ
    Urology; 2012 Jul; 80(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 22578829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shock wave lithotripsy success for renal stones based on patient and stone computed tomography characteristics.
    Weld KJ; Montiglio C; Morris MS; Bush AC; Cespedes RD
    Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1043-6; discussion 1046-7. PubMed ID: 18158009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography.
    Pareek G; Hedican SP; Lee FT; Nakada SY
    Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5):941-4. PubMed ID: 16286099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.