These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24908739)

  • 1. [Application of microfluidics in sperm isolation and in vitro fertilization].
    Li FF; Wang XY; Zhou SM; You F
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 May; 20(5):452-9. PubMed ID: 24908739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advances in microfluidic technology for sperm screening and in vitro fertilization.
    Ma J; Xie Q; Zhang Y; Xiao Q; Liu X; Qiao C; Tian Y
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2024 Jul; 416(16):3717-3735. PubMed ID: 38189916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rethinking gamete/embryo isolation and culture with microfluidics.
    Suh RS; Phadke N; Ohl DA; Takayama S; Smith GD
    Hum Reprod Update; 2003; 9(5):451-61. PubMed ID: 14640377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. IVF-on-a-Chip: Recent Advances in Microfluidics Technology for In Vitro Fertilization.
    Weng L
    SLAS Technol; 2019 Aug; 24(4):373-385. PubMed ID: 31145861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advances of microfluidic technology in reproductive biology.
    Nikshad A; Aghlmandi A; Safaralizadeh R; Aghebati-Maleki L; Warkiani ME; Khiavi FM; Yousefi M
    Life Sci; 2021 Jan; 265():118767. PubMed ID: 33212151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microfluidic Systems for Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Advantages and Potential Applications.
    Sequeira RC; Criswell T; Atala A; Yoo JJ
    Tissue Eng Regen Med; 2020 Dec; 17(6):787-800. PubMed ID: 33237567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Sperm selection in assisted reproductive technology: an update].
    Song YQ; Sha YW; Li P
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2012 Aug; 18(8):751-4. PubMed ID: 22934525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microfluidics: The future of sperm selection in assisted reproduction.
    Jahangiri AR; Ziarati N; Dadkhah E; Bucak MN; Rahimizadeh P; Shahverdi A; Sadighi Gilani MA; Topraggaleh TR
    Andrology; 2024 Sep; 12(6):1236-1252. PubMed ID: 38148634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of microfluidic technologies to human assisted reproduction.
    Smith GD; Takayama S
    Mol Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 23(4):257-268. PubMed ID: 28130394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microfluidics for sperm research.
    Knowlton SM; Sadasivam M; Tasoglu S
    Trends Biotechnol; 2015 Apr; 33(4):221-9. PubMed ID: 25798781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sperm selection in assisted reproduction: A review of established methods and cutting-edge possibilities.
    Marzano G; Chiriacò MS; Primiceri E; Dell'Aquila ME; Ramalho-Santos J; Zara V; Ferramosca A; Maruccio G
    Biotechnol Adv; 2020; 40():107498. PubMed ID: 31836499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Full in vitro fertilization laboratory mechanization: toward robotic assisted reproduction?
    Meseguer M; Kruhne U; Laursen S
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Jun; 97(6):1277-86. PubMed ID: 22480821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microfluidics as an emerging paradigm for assisted reproductive technology: A sperm separation perspective.
    Bouloorchi Tabalvandani M; Saeidpour Z; Habibi Z; Javadizadeh S; Firoozabadi SA; Badieirostami M
    Biomed Microdevices; 2024 Apr; 26(2):23. PubMed ID: 38652182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sperm Selection for ICSI: Do We Have a Winner?
    Baldini D; Ferri D; Baldini GM; Lot D; Catino A; Vizziello D; Vizziello G
    Cells; 2021 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 34944074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sperm motion in a microfluidic fertilization device.
    Lopez-Garcia MD; Monson RL; Haubert K; Wheeler MB; Beebe DJ
    Biomed Microdevices; 2008 Oct; 10(5):709-18. PubMed ID: 18454318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a cut-off value for sperm motility after different hours of incubation to select the suitable reproductive technology (IVF or ICSI).
    Zollner U; Martin S; Liebermann J; Steck T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Apr; 78(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 10203301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of advanced selection methods on sperm quality and ART outcome.
    Yetunde I; Vasiliki M
    Minerva Ginecol; 2013 Oct; 65(5):487-96. PubMed ID: 24096286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A fully integrated biomimetic microfluidic device for evaluation of sperm response to thermotaxis and chemotaxis.
    Yan Y; Zhang B; Fu Q; Wu J; Liu R
    Lab Chip; 2021 Jan; 21(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 33444427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Design, Fabrication, and Testing of a Microfluidic Device for Thermotaxis and Chemotaxis Assays of Sperm.
    Ko YJ; Maeng JH; Hwang SY; Ahn Y
    SLAS Technol; 2018 Dec; 23(6):507-515. PubMed ID: 29949396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual sperm selection by microfluidics integrated with interferometric phase microscopy.
    Eravuchira PJ; Mirsky SK; Barnea I; Levi M; Balberg M; Shaked NT
    Methods; 2018 Mar; 136():152-159. PubMed ID: 28958952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.