502 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24909098)
1. Performance of a novel wafer scale CMOS active pixel sensor for bio-medical imaging.
Esposito M; Anaxagoras T; Konstantinidis AC; Zheng Y; Speller RD; Evans PM; Allinson NM; Wells K
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 59(13):3533-54. PubMed ID: 24909098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 50 μm pixel pitch wafer-scale CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray detector for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Zhao C; Konstantinidis AC; Zheng Y; Anaxagoras T; Speller RD; Kanicki J
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(23):8977-9001. PubMed ID: 26540090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional cascaded system analysis of a 50 µm pixel pitch wafer-scale CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray detector for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Zhao C; Vassiljev N; Konstantinidis AC; Speller RD; Kanicki J
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1994-2017. PubMed ID: 28072394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Large area CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis: Analysis, modeling, and characterization.
Zhao C; Kanicki J; Konstantinidis AC; Patel T
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6294-308. PubMed ID: 26520722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Empirical electro-optical and x-ray performance evaluation of CMOS active pixels sensor for low dose, high resolution x-ray medical imaging.
Arvanitis CD; Bohndiek SE; Royle G; Blue A; Liang HX; Clark A; Prydderch M; Turchetta R; Speller R
Med Phys; 2007 Dec; 34(12):4612-25. PubMed ID: 18196789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physical characterization and performance comparison of active- and passive-pixel CMOS detectors for mammography.
Elbakri IA; McIntosh BJ; Rickey DW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(6):1743-55. PubMed ID: 19242050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Amorphous In-Ga-Zn-O thin-film transistor active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Zhao C; Kanicki J
Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091902. PubMed ID: 25186389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cascaded systems analysis of a-Se/a-Si and a-InGaZnO TFT passive and active pixel sensors for tomosynthesis.
Sengupta A; Zhao C; Konstantinidis A; Kanicki J
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(2):025012. PubMed ID: 30523916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. X-ray quantum limited portal imaging using amorphous silicon flat-panel arrays.
Munro P; Bouius DC
Med Phys; 1998 May; 25(5):689-702. PubMed ID: 9608480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. SU-E-I-25: Performance Evaluation of a Proposed CMOS-Based X-Ray Detector Using Linear Cascade Model Analysis.
Jain A; Bednarek D; Rudin S
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part4):3630. PubMed ID: 28519525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Theoretical investigation of the noise performance of active pixel imaging arrays based on polycrystalline silicon thin film transistors.
Koniczek M; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Liang AK; Zhao Q
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3491-3503. PubMed ID: 28376261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems.
Marshall NW; Monnin P; Bosmans H; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(14):4201-20. PubMed ID: 21701051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Imaging performance of the hybrid pixel detectors XPAD3-S.
Brunner FC; Clemens JC; Hemmer C; Morel C
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(6):1773-89. PubMed ID: 19258683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Empirical and theoretical investigation of the noise performance of indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) for diagnostic radiology.
Siewerdsen JH; Antonuk LE; el-Mohri Y; Yorkston J; Huang W; Boudry JM; Cunningham IA
Med Phys; 1997 Jan; 24(1):71-89. PubMed ID: 9029542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of solid-state avalanche amorphous selenium for medical imaging.
Scheuermann JR; Goldan AH; Tousignant O; Léveillé S; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 42(3):1223-6. PubMed ID: 25735277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Energy dispersive CdTe and CdZnTe detectors for spectral clinical CT and NDT applications.
Barber WC; Wessel JC; Nygard E; Iwanczyk JS
Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A; 2015 Jun; 784():531-537. PubMed ID: 25937684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Amorphous and polycrystalline photoconductors for direct conversion flat panel x-ray image sensors.
Kasap S; Frey JB; Belev G; Tousignant O; Mani H; Greenspan J; Laperriere L; Bubon O; Reznik A; DeCrescenzo G; Karim KS; Rowlands JA
Sensors (Basel); 2011; 11(5):5112-57. PubMed ID: 22163893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. X-ray imaging performance of scintillator-filled silicon pore arrays.
Simon M; Engel KJ; Menser B; Badel X; Linnros J
Med Phys; 2008 Mar; 35(3):968-81. PubMed ID: 18404933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Synchrotron based planar imaging and digital tomosynthesis of breast and biopsy phantoms using a CMOS active pixel sensor.
Szafraniec MB; Konstantinidis AC; Tromba G; Dreossi D; Vecchio S; Rigon L; Sodini N; Naday S; Gunn S; McArthur A; Olivo A
Phys Med; 2015 Mar; 31(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 25498332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Strategies to improve the signal and noise performance of active matrix, flat-panel imagers for diagnostic x-ray applications.
Antonuk LE; Jee KW; El-Mohri Y; Maolinbay M; Nassif S; Rong X; Zhao Q; Siewerdsen JH; Street RA; Shah KS
Med Phys; 2000 Feb; 27(2):289-306. PubMed ID: 10718132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
