445 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24909393)
1. Comparison of polyetheretherketone and titanium cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy.
Thien A; King NK; Ang BT; Wang E; Ng I
World Neurosurg; 2015 Feb; 83(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 24909393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The therapeutic cranioplasty still needs an ideal material and surgical timing.
Servadei F; Iaccarino C
World Neurosurg; 2015 Feb; 83(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 25153284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes following polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cranioplasty: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Punchak M; Chung LK; Lagman C; Bui TT; Lazareff J; Rezzadeh K; Jarrahy R; Yang I
J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 41():30-35. PubMed ID: 28377284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [First Experience with Cranioplasty Using the Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Implant - Retrospective Five-Year Follow-up Study].
Šámal F; Ouzký M; Strnad J; Haninec P; Linzer P; Filip M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2019; 86(6):431-434. PubMed ID: 31941571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of titanium mesh cranioplasty and polyetheretherketone cranioplasty: protocol for a multicentre, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial.
Yang J; Sun T; Yuan Y; Li X; Yu H; Guan J
BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e033997. PubMed ID: 31796495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Large Multicenter Retrospective Research on Embedded Cranioplasty and Covered Cranioplasty.
Zhang Q; Yuan Y; Li X; Sun T; Zhou Y; Yu H; Guan J
World Neurosurg; 2018 Apr; 112():e645-e651. PubMed ID: 29374612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcome in patient-specific PEEK cranioplasty: A two-center cohort study of 40 implants.
Jonkergouw J; van de Vijfeijken SE; Nout E; Theys T; Van de Casteele E; Folkersma H; Depauw PR; Becking AG
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1266-72. PubMed ID: 27524384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With PEEK Versus Titanium Cranioplasty Reconstruction.
Asaad M; Taslakian EN; Banuelos J; Abu-Ghname A; Bite U; Mardini S; Van Gompel JJ; Sharaf B
J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Jan-Feb 01; 32(1):193-197. PubMed ID: 33074970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-designed PEEK implants: a peek into the future of cranioplasty?
Ng ZY; Nawaz I
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 25(1):e55-8. PubMed ID: 24406603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Allergic Epidural Effusion Following Polyetheretherketone Cranioplasty.
Qiu S; You W; Wang H; Zhou X; Yang X
J Craniofac Surg; 2019; 30(3):e241-e243. PubMed ID: 30730518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical preference regarding different materials for custom-made allograft cranioplasty in patients with calvarial defects: Results from an internal audit covering the last 20 years.
Ganau M; Cebula H; Fricia M; Zaed I; Todeschi J; Scibilia A; Gallinaro P; Coca A; Chaussemy D; Ollivier I; Ligarotti GKI; des Neiges Santin M; Proust F; Chibbaro S
J Clin Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 74():98-103. PubMed ID: 32033859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Alloplastic Cranioplasty Reconstruction: A Systematic Review Comparing Outcomes With Titanium Mesh, Polymethyl Methacrylate, Polyether Ether Ketone, and Norian Implants in 3591 Adult Patients.
Oliver JD; Banuelos J; Abu-Ghname A; Vyas KS; Sharaf B
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 May; 82(5S Suppl 4):S289-S294. PubMed ID: 30973834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of titanium cranioplasty and polyetheretherketone cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury: A prospective, multicenter, non-randomized controlled trial.
Yang J; Sun T; Yuan Y; Li X; Yu H; Guan J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jul; 99(30):e21251. PubMed ID: 32791701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Polyetheretherketone implants for the repair of large cranial defects: a 3-center experience.
Rosenthal G; Ng I; Moscovici S; Lee KK; Lay T; Martin C; Manley GT
Neurosurgery; 2014 Nov; 75(5):523-9; discussion 528-9. PubMed ID: 24979096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient-specific polyetheretherketone implants for repair of craniofacial defects.
Rammos CK; Cayci C; Castro-Garcia JA; Feiz-Erfan I; Lettieri SC
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 May; 26(3):631-3. PubMed ID: 25901667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computed-tomography modeled polyether ether ketone (PEEK) implants in revision cranioplasty.
O'Reilly EB; Barnett S; Madden C; Welch B; Mickey B; Rozen S
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Mar; 68(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 25541423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cranioplasty with customized titanium and PEEK implants in a mechanical stress model.
Lethaus B; Safi Y; ter Laak-Poort M; Kloss-Brandstätter A; Banki F; Robbenmenke C; Steinseifer U; Kessler P
J Neurotrauma; 2012 Apr; 29(6):1077-83. PubMed ID: 22017579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The application of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants in cranioplasty.
Zhang J; Tian W; Chen J; Yu J; Zhang J; Chen J
Brain Res Bull; 2019 Nov; 153():143-149. PubMed ID: 31425730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between the different types of heterologous materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review of the literature.
Morselli C; Zaed I; Tropeano MP; Cataletti G; Iaccarino C; Rossini Z; Servadei F
J Neurosurg Sci; 2019 Dec; 63(6):723-736. PubMed ID: 31599560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Titanium Mesh and Custom Implants for Cranioplasty.
Rosinski CL; Patel S; Geever B; Chiu RG; Chaker AN; Zakrzewski J; Rosenberg DM; Parola R; Shah K; Behbahani M; Mehta AI
Neurosurgery; 2020 Jan; 86(1):E15-E22. PubMed ID: 31529096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
