These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24909534)

  • 1. In-training evaluations: developing an automated screening tool to measure report quality.
    Bismil R; Dudek NL; Wood TJ
    Med Educ; 2014 Jul; 48(7):724-32. PubMed ID: 24909534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality in-training evaluation reports--does feedback drive faculty performance?
    Dudek NL; Marks MB; Bandiera G; White J; Wood TJ
    Acad Med; 2013 Aug; 88(8):1129-34. PubMed ID: 23807095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the quality of supervisors' completed clinical evaluation reports.
    Dudek NL; Marks MB; Wood TJ; Lee AC
    Med Educ; 2008 Aug; 42(8):816-22. PubMed ID: 18564093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Quality of Assessment of Learning (Qual) Score: Validity Evidence for a Scoring System Aimed at Rating Short, Workplace-Based Comments on Trainee Performance.
    Chan TM; Sebok-Syer SS; Sampson C; Monteiro S
    Teach Learn Med; 2020; 32(3):319-329. PubMed ID: 32013584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do in-training evaluation reports deserve their bad reputations? A study of the reliability and predictive ability of ITER scores and narrative comments.
    Ginsburg S; Eva K; Regehr G
    Acad Med; 2013 Oct; 88(10):1539-44. PubMed ID: 23969371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does faculty development influence the quality of in-training evaluation reports in pharmacy?
    Wilbur K
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Nov; 17(1):222. PubMed ID: 29157239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Daily Encounter Cards-Evaluating the Quality of Documented Assessments.
    Cheung WJ; Dudek N; Wood TJ; Frank JR
    J Grad Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 8(4):601-604. PubMed ID: 27777675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An exploration of faculty perspectives on the in-training evaluation of residents.
    Watling CJ; Kenyon CF; Schulz V; Goldszmidt MA; Zibrowski E; Lingard L
    Acad Med; 2010 Jul; 85(7):1157-62. PubMed ID: 20592512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Supervisor-trainee continuity and the quality of work-based assessments.
    Cheung WJ; Dudek NL; Wood TJ; Frank JR
    Med Educ; 2017 Dec; 51(12):1260-1268. PubMed ID: 28971502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing the Ottawa Emergency Department Shift Observation Tool (O-EDShOT) to the traditional daily encounter card: measuring the quality of documented assessments.
    Endres K; Dudek N; McConnell M; Cheung WJ
    CJEM; 2021 May; 23(3):383-389. PubMed ID: 33512695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Daily Evaluation Cards Are Superior for Student Assessment Compared to Single Rater In-Training Evaluations.
    Johnston J; Pinsk M
    Med Sci Educ; 2020 Mar; 30(1):203-209. PubMed ID: 34457660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Faculty Development- Is Some Better Than None?
    Crawford KA; Wood TJ; Lalonde KA; Dudek N
    MedEdPublish (2016); 2019; 8():18. PubMed ID: 38089342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity evidence of resident competency ratings and the identification of problem residents.
    Park YS; Riddle J; Tekian A
    Med Educ; 2014 Jun; 48(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 24807437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nudging clinical supervisors to provide better in-training assessment reports.
    Dory V; Cummings BA; Mondou M; Young M
    Perspect Med Educ; 2020 Feb; 9(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 31848999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality evaluation reports: Can a faculty development program make a difference?
    Dudek NL; Marks MB; Wood TJ; Dojeiji S; Bandiera G; Hatala R; Cooke L; Sadownik L
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(11):e725-31. PubMed ID: 23140304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rater variables associated with ITER ratings.
    Paget M; Wu C; McIlwrick J; Woloschuk W; Wright B; McLaughlin K
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2013 Oct; 18(4):551-7. PubMed ID: 22777161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using In-Training Evaluation Report (ITER) Qualitative Comments to Assess Medical Students and Residents: A Systematic Review.
    Hatala R; Sawatsky AP; Dudek N; Ginsburg S; Cook DA
    Acad Med; 2017 Jun; 92(6):868-879. PubMed ID: 28557953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Redesigning an educational assessment program.
    Al Kadri HM
    Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl; 2009 May; 20(3):476-80. PubMed ID: 19414957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Workplace-based assessments of junior doctors: do scores predict training difficulties?
    Mitchell C; Bhat S; Herbert A; Baker P
    Med Educ; 2011 Dec; 45(12):1190-8. PubMed ID: 21995509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Twelve tips for completing quality in-training evaluation reports.
    Dudek N; Dojeiji S
    Med Teach; 2014 Dec; 36(12):1038-42. PubMed ID: 24986650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.