180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24909592)
1. Ambient noise impact on accuracy of automated hearing assessment.
Storey KK; Muñoz K; Nelson L; Larsen J; White K
Int J Audiol; 2014 Oct; 53(10):730-6. PubMed ID: 24909592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pure-tone audiometry outside a sound booth using earphone attentuation, integrated noise monitoring, and automation.
Swanepoel de W; Matthysen C; Eikelboom RH; Clark JL; Hall JW
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(11):777-85. PubMed ID: 26514954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of a Tablet Audiometer for Measuring Behavioral Hearing Thresholds in a Clinical Population.
Thompson GP; Sladen DP; Borst BJ; Still OL
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Nov; 153(5):838-42. PubMed ID: 26183518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical validation of the AMTAS automated audiometer.
Eikelboom RH; Swanepoel de W; Motakef S; Upson GS
Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 23548148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical validation of automated audiometry with continuous noise-monitoring in a clinically heterogeneous population outside a sound-treated environment.
Brennan-Jones CG; Eikelboom RH; Swanepoel de W; Friedland PL; Atlas MD
Int J Audiol; 2016 Sep; 55(9):507-13. PubMed ID: 27206551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Smartphone threshold audiometry in underserved primary health-care contexts.
Sandström J; Swanepoel de W; Carel Myburgh H; Laurent C
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 26795898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of Mobile-Based Audiometry in the Evaluation of Hearing Loss in Quiet and Noisy Environments.
Saliba J; Al-Reefi M; Carriere JS; Verma N; Provencal C; Rappaport JM
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Apr; 156(4):706-711. PubMed ID: 28025906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity of diagnostic computer-based air and forehead bone conduction audiometry.
Swanepoel de W; Biagio L
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Apr; 8(4):210-4. PubMed ID: 21391065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adapting Audiology Procedures During the Pandemic: Validity and Efficacy of Testing Outside a Sound Booth.
Serpanos YC; Hobbs M; Nunez K; Gambino L; Butler J
Am J Audiol; 2022 Mar; 31(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 34965363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity of diagnostic pure-tone audiometry without a sound-treated environment in older adults.
Maclennan-Smith F; Swanepoel de W; Hall JW
Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):66-73. PubMed ID: 23140522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic pure-tone audiometry in schools: mobile testing without a sound-treated environment.
Swanepoel de W; Maclennan-Smith F; Hall JW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):992-1000. PubMed ID: 24384084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated Audiometry in Quiet and Simulated Exam Room Noise for Listeners with Normal Hearing and Impaired Hearing.
Bean BN; Roberts RA; Picou EM; Angley GP; Edwards AJ
J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jan; 33(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 34034339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Self-administered hearing loss screening using an interactive, tablet play audiometer with ear bud headphones.
Yeung JC; Heley S; Beauregard Y; Champagne S; Bromwich MA
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Aug; 79(8):1248-52. PubMed ID: 26055197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of a computerized self-administered hearing test.
Kam AC; Sung JK; Lee T; Wong TK; van Hasselt A
Int J Audiol; 2012 Aug; 51(8):606-10. PubMed ID: 22676699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Active noise reduction audiometry: a prospective analysis of a new approach to noise management in audiometric testing.
Bromwich MA; Parsa V; Lanthier N; Yoo J; Parnes LS
Laryngoscope; 2008 Jan; 118(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18043495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. OtoID: new extended frequency, portable audiometer for ototoxicity monitoring.
Dille MF; Jacobs PG; Gordon SY; Helt WJ; McMillan GP
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(7):997-1006. PubMed ID: 24301436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Smartphone-Facilitated In-Situ Hearing Aid Audiometry for Community-Based Hearing Testing.
Frisby C; De Sousa KC; Eikelboom RH; Mahomed-Asmail F; Moore DR; de Kock T; Manchaiah V; Swanepoel W
Ear Hear; 2024 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):1019-1032. PubMed ID: 38424667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Smartphone hearing screening with integrated quality control and data management.
Swanepoel de W; Myburgh HC; Howe DM; Mahomed F; Eikelboom RH
Int J Audiol; 2014 Dec; 53(12):841-9. PubMed ID: 24998412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development and evaluation of a tablet-based diagnostic audiometer.
Thoidis I; Vrysis L; Markou K; Papanikolaou G
Int J Audiol; 2019 Aug; 58(8):476-483. PubMed ID: 30987489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
