These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24909592)

  • 41. Maturation of the occlusion effect: a bone conduction auditory steady state response study in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Small SA; Hu N
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):708-19. PubMed ID: 21617531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Predicting hearing thresholds and occupational hearing loss with multiple-frequency auditory steady-state responses.
    Hsu RF; Ho CK; Lu SN; Chen SS
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Oct; 39(5):504-10. PubMed ID: 20828512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison of air-conduction and bone-conduction hearing thresholds for pure tones and octave-band filtered sound effects.
    Abouchacra KS; Letowski T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1999 Sep; 10(8):422-8. PubMed ID: 10813642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Auditory Processing Testing: In the Booth versus Outside the Booth.
    Lucker JR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Sep; 28(8):679-684. PubMed ID: 28906239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Use of noise cancellation earphones in out-of-booth audiometric evaluations.
    Clark JG; Brady M; Earl BR; Scheifele PM; Snyder L; Clark SD
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):989-996. PubMed ID: 28783994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; van der Pouw CT; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 11465298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A treatise on the thresholds of interoctave frequencies: 1500, 3000, and 6000 Hz.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):171-86. PubMed ID: 24828218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Extended High-Frequency Audiometry using the Wireless Automated Hearing Test System Compared to Manual Audiometry in Children and Adolescents.
    Blankenship CM; Hickson LM; Quigley T; Larsen E; Lin L; Hunter LL
    medRxiv; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37292836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Predicting the degree of hearing loss using click auditory brainstem response in babies referred from newborn hearing screening.
    Baldwin M; Watkin P
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):361-9. PubMed ID: 23340456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Analysis of click-evoked auditory brainstem responses using time domain cross-correlations between interleaved responses.
    Berninger E; Olofsson A; Leijon A
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):318-29. PubMed ID: 24557002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Validation of web-based audiometry version of HEARZAP.
    P PR; Ramkumar V
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0283519. PubMed ID: 36976819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Can Uhear me now? Validation of an iPod-based hearing loss screening test.
    Szudek J; Ostevik A; Dziegielewski P; Robinson-Anagor J; Gomaa N; Hodgetts B; Ho A
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Apr; 41 Suppl 1():S78-84. PubMed ID: 22569055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The use of cortical evoked response audiometry in the assessment of noise-induced hearing loss.
    Hone SW; Norman G; Keogh I; Kelly V
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2003 Feb; 128(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 12601323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Audiological findings among workers from Brazilian small-scale fisheries.
    Paini MC; Morata TC; Corteletti LJ; Albizu E; Marques JM; Santos L
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 19050644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Boeheim K; Pok SM; Schloegel M; Filzmoser P
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Hearing disability measured by the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale in clinically normal-hearing and hearing-impaired middle-aged persons, and disability screening by means of a reduced SSQ (the SSQ5).
    Demeester K; Topsakal V; Hendrickx JJ; Fransen E; van Laer L; Van Camp G; Van de Heyning P; van Wieringen A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):615-6. PubMed ID: 22568994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Validation of multi-channel auditory steady-state response in adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Chen PR; Hsu CJ; Wu HP
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Jan; 123(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 18452631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The GoAudio Quantitative Mobile Audiology Test Enhances Access to Clinical Hearing Assessments.
    Koleilat A; Argue DP; Schimmenti LA; Ekker SC; Poling GL
    Am J Audiol; 2020 Dec; 29(4):887-897. PubMed ID: 33079580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Home Hearing Test: Within-Subjects Threshold Variability.
    Margolis RH; Bratt G; Feeney MP; Killion MC; Saly GL
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):906-909. PubMed ID: 29356703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Assessment of hearing loss by pure-tone audiometry in patients with mucopolysaccharidoses.
    Lin HY; Shih SC; Chuang CK; Lee KS; Chen MR; Lin HC; Chiu PC; Niu DM; Lin SP
    Mol Genet Metab; 2014 Apr; 111(4):533-8. PubMed ID: 24594444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.