These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24909603)

  • 1. Speech-perception training for older adults with hearing loss impacts word recognition and effort.
    Kuchinsky SE; Ahlstrom JB; Cute SL; Humes LE; Dubno JR; Eckert MA
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Oct; 51(10):1046-57. PubMed ID: 24909603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss.
    Kuchinsky SE; Ahlstrom JB; Vaden KI; Cute SL; Humes LE; Dubno JR; Eckert MA
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Jan; 50(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 23157603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of speaker age on speech recognition and perceived listening effort in older adults with hearing loss.
    McAuliffe MJ; Wilding PJ; Rickard NA; O'Beirne GA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):838-47. PubMed ID: 22232404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Task-Related Vigilance During Word Recognition in Noise for Older Adults with Hearing Loss.
    Kuchinsky SE; Vaden KI; Ahlstrom JB; Cute SL; Humes LE; Dubno JR; Eckert MA
    Exp Aging Res; 2016; 42(1):50-66. PubMed ID: 26683041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cortisol, Chromogranin A, and Pupillary Responses Evoked by Speech Recognition Tasks in Normally Hearing and Hard-of-Hearing Listeners: A Pilot Study.
    Kramer SE; Teunissen CE; Zekveld AA
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37 Suppl 1():126S-35S. PubMed ID: 27355762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring the Impact of Tinnitus on Aided Listening Effort Using Pupillary Response.
    Juul Jensen J; Callaway SL; Lunner T; Wendt D
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518795340. PubMed ID: 30205768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual Variations in Effort: Assessing Pupillometry for the Hearing Impaired.
    Wagner AE; Nagels L; Toffanin P; Opie JM; Başkent D
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519845596. PubMed ID: 31131729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
    Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relations Between Self-Reported Daily-Life Fatigue, Hearing Status, and Pupil Dilation During a Speech Perception in Noise Task.
    Wang Y; Naylor G; Kramer SE; Zekveld AA; Wendt D; Ohlenforst B; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):573-582. PubMed ID: 29117062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG.
    Miles K; McMahon C; Boisvert I; Ibrahim R; de Lissa P; Graham P; Lyxell B
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517706396. PubMed ID: 28752807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Application of Pupillometry in Hearing Science to Assess Listening Effort.
    Naylor G; Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Kramer SE
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518799437. PubMed ID: 30208763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reconstructing wholes from parts: effects of modality, age, and hearing loss on word recognition.
    Krull V; Humes LE; Kidd GR
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(2):e14-23. PubMed ID: 23165223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age and measurement time-of-day effects on speech recognition in noise.
    Veneman CE; Gordon-Salant S; Matthews LJ; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):288-99. PubMed ID: 23187606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Word recognition within a linguistic context: effects of age, hearing acuity, verbal ability, and cognitive function.
    Benichov J; Cox LC; Tun PA; Wingfield A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 21918453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.