247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24910586)
1. Commentary: ethical issues of current health-protection policies on low-dose ionizing radiation.
Socol Y; Dobrzyński L; Doss M; Feinendegen LE; Janiak MK; Miller ML; Sanders CL; Scott BR; Ulsh B; Vaiserman A
Dose Response; 2014 May; 12(2):342-8. PubMed ID: 24910586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changing Attitude Toward Radiation Carcinogenesis and Prospects for Novel Low-Dose Radiation Treatments.
Socol Y; Welsh JS
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Dec; 15(6):732-736. PubMed ID: 26391015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are We Approaching the End of the Linear No-Threshold Era?
Doss M
J Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1786-1793. PubMed ID: 30262515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A brief review of radiation hormesis.
Jolly D; Meyer J
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2009 Dec; 32(4):180-7. PubMed ID: 20169836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. LNT and cancer risk assessment: Its flawed foundations part 1: Radiation and leukemia: Where LNT began.
Calabrese EJ
Environ Res; 2021 Jun; 197():111025. PubMed ID: 33744270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preserving the Anti-Scientific Linear No-Threshold Myth: Authority, Agnosticism, Transparency, and the Standard of Care.
Sacks B; Siegel JA
Dose Response; 2017; 15(3):1559325817717839. PubMed ID: 28814947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interplay of immune modulation, adaptive response and hormesis: Suggestive of threshold for clinical manifestation of effects of ionizing radiation at low doses?
Chaurasia RK; Sapra BK; Aswal DK
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Mar; 917():170178. PubMed ID: 38280586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The LNT Issue Is About Politics and Economics, Not Safety.
Cuttler JM
Dose Response; 2020; 18(3):1559325820949066. PubMed ID: 32952483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethics of Adoption and Use of the Linear No-Threshold Model.
Yanovskiy M; Shaki YY; Socol Y
Dose Response; 2019; 17(1):1559325818822602. PubMed ID: 30733652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A message to Fukushima: nothing to fear but fear itself.
Sutou S
Genes Environ; 2016; 38():12. PubMed ID: 27350831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. It Is Time to Move Beyond the Linear No-Threshold Theory for Low-Dose Radiation Protection.
Cardarelli JJ; Ulsh BA
Dose Response; 2018; 16(3):1559325818779651. PubMed ID: 30013457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ionizing radiation protection and the linear No-threshold controversy: Extent of support or counter to the prevailing paradigm.
Okonkwo UC; Ohagwu CC; Aronu ME; Okafor CE; Idumah CI; Okokpujie IP; Chukwu NN; Chukwunyelu CE
J Environ Radioact; 2022 Nov; 253-254():106984. PubMed ID: 36057228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Health Impacts of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation: Current Scientific Debates and Regulatory Issues.
Vaiserman A; Koliada A; Zabuga O; Socol Y
Dose Response; 2018; 16(3):1559325818796331. PubMed ID: 30263019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Until There Is a Resolution of the Pro-LNT/Anti-LNT Debate, We Should Head Toward a More Sensible Graded Approach for Protection From Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation.
Sykes PJ
Dose Response; 2020; 18(2):1559325820921651. PubMed ID: 32425725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The challenges of defining hormesis in epidemiological studies: The case of radiation hormesis.
Iavicoli I; Fontana L; Santocono C; Guarino D; Laudiero M; Calabrese EJ
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Dec; 902():166030. PubMed ID: 37544458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Tremendous Human, Social, and Economic Losses Caused by Obstinate Application of the Failed Linear No-threshold Model].
Sutou S
Yakugaku Zasshi; 2015; 135(11):1197-211. PubMed ID: 26521869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Low-dose radiation from A-bombs elongated lifespan and reduced cancer mortality relative to un-irradiated individuals.
Sutou S
Genes Environ; 2018; 40():26. PubMed ID: 30598710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Model Uncertainty via the Integration of Hormesis and LNT as the Default in Cancer Risk Assessment.
Calabrese EJ
Dose Response; 2015; 13(4):1559325815621764. PubMed ID: 26740815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Black rain in Hiroshima: a critique to the Life Span Study of A-bomb survivors, basis of the linear no-threshold model.
Sutou S
Genes Environ; 2020; 42():1. PubMed ID: 31908690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiation hormesis: historical perspective and implications for low-dose cancer risk assessment.
Vaiserman AM
Dose Response; 2010 Jan; 8(2):172-91. PubMed ID: 20585444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
