These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24910586)

  • 21. Radiation hormesis: historical perspective and implications for low-dose cancer risk assessment.
    Vaiserman AM
    Dose Response; 2010 Jan; 8(2):172-91. PubMed ID: 20585444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Linear No-Threshold model and standards for protection against radiation.
    Shamoun DY
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jun; 77():49-53. PubMed ID: 26924276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Radiological protection issues arising during and after the Fukushima nuclear reactor accident.
    González AJ; Akashi M; Boice JD; Chino M; Homma T; Ishigure N; Kai M; Kusumi S; Lee JK; Menzel HG; Niwa O; Sakai K; Weiss W; Yamashita S; Yonekura Y
    J Radiol Prot; 2013 Sep; 33(3):497-571. PubMed ID: 23803462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sparsely ionizing diagnostic and natural background radiations are likely preventing cancer and other genomic-instability-associated diseases.
    Scott BR; Di Palma J
    Dose Response; 2006 Dec; 5(3):230-55. PubMed ID: 18648608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Twenty five years of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine - progress and priorities for future of radiation medicine and biology.
    Bazyka D
    Probl Radiac Med Radiobiol; 2017 Dec; 22():10-14. PubMed ID: 29286493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The linear nonthreshold (LNT) model as used in radiation protection: an NCRP update.
    Boice JD
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2017 Oct; 93(10):1079-1092. PubMed ID: 28532210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Low-Dose Radiation Risks of Computerized Tomography and Cone Beam Computerized Tomography: Reducing the Fear and Controversy.
    Lee CY; Koval TM; Suzuki JB
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Oct; 41(5):e223-30. PubMed ID: 24669832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Low-dose radiation risk extrapolation fallacy associated with the linear-no-threshold model.
    Scott BR
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 27(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 18480143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 1. The Russell-Muller debate.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Res; 2017 Apr; 154():435-451. PubMed ID: 28109526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Basis of radiation protection].
    Roth J; Schweizer P; Gückel C
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1996 Jun; 126(26):1157-71. PubMed ID: 8711464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. What are the risks from medical X-rays and other low dose radiation?
    Wall BF; Kendall GM; Edwards AA; Bouffler S; Muirhead CR; Meara JR
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Apr; 79(940):285-94. PubMed ID: 16585719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Implications of recent epidemiologic studies for the linear nonthreshold model and radiation protection.
    Shore RE; Beck HL; Boice JD; Caffrey EA; Davis S; Grogan HA; Mettler FA; Preston RJ; Till JE; Wakeford R; Walsh L; Dauer LT
    J Radiol Prot; 2018 Sep; 38(3):1217-1233. PubMed ID: 30004025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 2. How a mistake led BEIR I to adopt LNT.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Res; 2017 Apr; 154():452-458. PubMed ID: 27974149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A critical evaluation of the NCRP COMMENTARY 27 endorsement of the linear no-threshold model of radiation effects.
    Ulsh BA
    Environ Res; 2018 Nov; 167():472-487. PubMed ID: 30138826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Review of Recent Low-dose Research and Recommendations for Moving Forward.
    Wilson C; Adams GG; Patel P; Windham K; Ennis C; Caffrey E
    Health Phys; 2024 Jun; 126(6):386-396. PubMed ID: 38568156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Database of radiogenic cancer in experimental animals exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation.
    Duport P; Jiang H; Shilnikova NS; Krewski D; Zielinski JM
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2012; 15(3):186-209. PubMed ID: 22458255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. LNT--an apparent rather than a real controversy?
    Charles MW
    J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):325-9. PubMed ID: 16926475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Does scientific evidence support a change from the LNT model for low-dose radiation risk extrapolation?
    Averbeck D
    Health Phys; 2009 Nov; 97(5):493-504. PubMed ID: 19820459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Cancer incidence and mortality after low-dose radiation exposure: epidemiological aspects].
    Vaĭserman A; Mekhova LV; Koshel' NM; Voĭtenko VP
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2010; 50(6):691-702. PubMed ID: 21434396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Ionizing radiation].
    Masse R
    C R Acad Sci III; 2000 Jul; 323(7):633-40. PubMed ID: 10983274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.