These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24910695)

  • 1. Effect of master apical file size and taper on irrigation and cleaning of the apical third of curved canals.
    Akhlaghi NM; Dadresanfar B; Darmiani S; Moshari A
    J Dent (Tehran); 2014 Mar; 11(2):188-95. PubMed ID: 24910695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.
    Kiran S; Prakash S; Siddharth PR; Saha S; Geojan NE; Ramachandran M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 27595725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effect of Size and Taper of Apical Preparation in Reducing Intra-Canal Bacteria: A Quantitative SEM Study.
    Mohammadzadeh Akhlaghi N; Rahimifard N; Moshari A; Vatanpour M; Darmiani S
    Iran Endod J; 2014; 9(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 24396378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimal Apical Enlargement for Penetration of Irrigants to the Apical Third of Root Canal System: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study.
    Srikanth P; Krishna AG; Srinivas S; Reddy ES; Battu S; Aravelli S
    J Int Oral Health; 2015 Jun; 7(6):92-6. PubMed ID: 26124608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of MTAD, Glyde and EDTA in debridement of curved root canals.
    Mohammadzadeh Akhlaghi N; Behrooz E; Saghiri MA
    Iran Endod J; 2009; 4(2):58-62. PubMed ID: 23940487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
    Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determination of the minimum instrumentation size for penetration of irrigants to the apical third of root canal systems.
    Khademi A; Yazdizadeh M; Feizianfard M
    J Endod; 2006 May; 32(5):417-20. PubMed ID: 16631839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Smear Layer Evaluation on Root Canal Preparation with Manual and Rotary Techniques using EDTA as an Irrigant: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.
    Manjunatha M; Annapurna K; Sudhakar V; Sunil Kumar V; Hiremath VK; Shah A
    J Int Oral Health; 2013 Feb; 5(1):66-78. PubMed ID: 24155580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of size and taper of basic root canal preparation on root canal cleanliness: a scanning electron microscopy study.
    Plotino G; Özyürek T; Grande NM; Gündoğar M
    Int Endod J; 2019 Mar; 52(3):343-351. PubMed ID: 30129186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Residual Smear Layer Following Preparation of Curved Root Canals Using Hand Instrumentation or Two Engine-Driven Systems.
    Khademi A; Saatchi M; Shokouhi MM; Baghaei B
    Iran Endod J; 2015; 10(4):236-9. PubMed ID: 26523137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of influence of different manufacturing methods on the cleaning efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium files.
    Celik D; Taşdemir T; Er K
    Microsc Res Tech; 2013 Mar; 76(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 23180471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
    Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
    J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A scanning electron microscopic comparison of the cleaning efficacy of endodontic irrigants.
    Khedmat S; Shadi A
    Iran Endod J; 2007; 2(3):95-8. PubMed ID: 24298289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Debris and Smear Layer Removal from Oval Root Canals Comparing XP-Endo Finisher, EndoActivator, and Manual Irrigation: A SEM Evaluation.
    Alakshar A; Saleh ARM; Gorduysus MO
    Eur J Dent; 2020 Oct; 14(4):626-633. PubMed ID: 32777834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effect of Preparation Size on Efficacy of Smear Layer Removal; A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study.
    Tabrizizadeh M; Shareghi A
    Iran Endod J; 2015; 10(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 26213539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of Different Apical Preparations on Root Canal Cleanliness in Human Molars: a SEM Study.
    Plotino G; Grande NM; Tocci L; Testarelli L; Gambarini G
    J Oral Maxillofac Res; 2014 Apr; 5(2):e4. PubMed ID: 25089176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy using Four Novel Nickel-titanium Rotary Instruments: An in vitro Scanning Electron Microscope Study.
    Kar PP; Khasnis SA; Kidiyoor KH
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Dec; 18(12):1135-1143. PubMed ID: 29208788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher file on smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation].
    Xin Y; Yang J; Song KY
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 37(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 30854818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SEM evaluation of root canal debridement with Sonicare CanalBrush irrigation.
    Salman MI; Baumann MA; Hellmich M; Roggendorf MJ; Termaat S
    Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):363-9. PubMed ID: 20518928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.