These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24911135)

  • 1. Type I error inflation in the traditional by-participant analysis to metamemory accuracy: a generalized mixed-effects model perspective.
    Murayama K; Sakaki M; Yan VX; Smith GM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1287-306. PubMed ID: 24911135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sources of bias in the Goodman-Kruskal gamma coefficient measure of association: implications for studies of metacognitive processes.
    Masson ME; Rotello CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):509-27. PubMed ID: 19271863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Metacognitive judgments-of-learning in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder.
    Wojcik DZ; Waterman AH; Lestié C; Moulin CJ; Souchay C
    Autism; 2014 May; 18(4):393-408. PubMed ID: 24151127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finding the self in metacognitive evaluations: metamemory and agency in nondemented elders.
    Cosentino S; Metcalfe J; Holmes B; Steffener J; Stern Y
    Neuropsychology; 2011 Sep; 25(5):602-12. PubMed ID: 21728426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissociations among judgments do not reflect cognitive priority: an associative explanation of memory for frequency information in contingency learning.
    Vadillo MA; Luque D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Mar; 67(1):60-71. PubMed ID: 22506878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Embodiment meets metamemory: weight as a cue for metacognitive judgments.
    Alban MW; Kelley CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1628-34. PubMed ID: 23565793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Test-enhanced learning of natural concepts: effects on recognition memory, classification, and metacognition.
    Jacoby LL; Wahlheim CN; Coane JH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1441-51. PubMed ID: 20804279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigating strength and frequency effects in recognition memory using type-2 signal detection theory.
    Higham PA; Perfect TJ; Bruno D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):57-80. PubMed ID: 19210081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metacognition, metamemory, and mindreading in high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorder.
    Grainger C; Williams DM; Lind SE
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2014 Aug; 123(3):650-9. PubMed ID: 24955572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. No special K! A signal detection framework for the strategic regulation of memory accuracy.
    Higham PA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Feb; 136(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 17324082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Normative multitrial recall performance, metacognitive judgments, and retrieval latencies for Lithuanian-English paired associates.
    Grimaldi PJ; Pyc MA; Rawson KA
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Aug; 42(3):634-42. PubMed ID: 20805585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How the measurement of memory processes can affect memory performance: the case of remember/know judgments.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Kilb A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):194-203. PubMed ID: 21895390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Metamemory judgments and study time allocation in young and older adults: dissociative effects of a generation task.
    Froger C; Sacher M; Gaudouen MS; Isingrini M; Taconnat L
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Dec; 65(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 22141753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A revised methodology for research on metamemory: Pre-judgment Recall and Monitoring (PRAM).
    Nelson TO; Narens L; Dunlosky J
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Mar; 9(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 15053719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A critical comparison of discrete-state and continuous models of recognition memory: implications for recognition and beyond.
    Pazzaglia AM; Dube C; Rotello CM
    Psychol Bull; 2013 Nov; 139(6):1173-203. PubMed ID: 23731174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In a year, memory will benefit from learning, tomorrow it won't: distance and construal level effects on the basis of metamemory judgments.
    Halamish V; Nussinson R; Ben-Ari L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1621-7. PubMed ID: 23586805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Separating mnemonic process from participant and item effects in the assessment of ROC asymmetries.
    Pratte MS; Rouder JN; Morey RD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):224-32. PubMed ID: 20053058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A stochastic detection and retrieval model for the study of metacognition.
    Jang Y; Wallsten TS; Huber DE
    Psychol Rev; 2012 Jan; 119(1):186-200. PubMed ID: 22059901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of familiarity level and repetition on recognition accuracy.
    Tussing AA; Greene RL
    Am J Psychol; 2001; 114(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 11258228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: a meta-analytic review.
    Rhodes MG; Tauber SK
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jan; 137(1):131-48. PubMed ID: 21219059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.