These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24911137)

  • 1. The impact of disablers on predictive inference.
    Cummins DD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1638-55. PubMed ID: 24911137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neglect of alternative causes in predictive but not diagnostic reasoning.
    Fernbach PM; Darlow A; Sloman SA
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Mar; 21(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 20424064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Asymmetries in predictive and diagnostic reasoning.
    Fernbach PM; Darlow A; Sloman SA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 May; 140(2):168-85. PubMed ID: 21219081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Non-bayesian inference: causal structure trumps correlation.
    Bes B; Sloman S; Lucas CG; Raufaste E
    Cogn Sci; 2012; 36(7):1178-203. PubMed ID: 22734828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reasoners consider alternative causes in predictive and diagnostic reasoning.
    Aßfalg A; Klauer KC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2188-2208. PubMed ID: 30998074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of causal models in multiple judgments under uncertainty.
    Hayes BK; Hawkins GE; Newell BR; Pasqualino M; Rehder B
    Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):611-20. PubMed ID: 25238316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consider the alternative: The effects of causal knowledge on representing and using alternative hypotheses in judgments under uncertainty.
    Hayes BK; Hawkins GE; Newell BR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 May; 42(5):723-39. PubMed ID: 26569437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Win-Stay, Lose-Sample: a simple sequential algorithm for approximating Bayesian inference.
    Bonawitz E; Denison S; Gopnik A; Griffiths TL
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 Nov; 74():35-65. PubMed ID: 25086501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inference-based retrospective revaluation in human causal judgments requires knowledge of within-compound relationships.
    Mitchell CJ; Killedar A; Lovibond PF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):418-24. PubMed ID: 16248728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A quantitative causal model theory of conditional reasoning.
    Fernbach PM; Erb CD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1327-43. PubMed ID: 23565785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When does information about causal structure improve statistical reasoning?
    McNair S; Feeney A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):625-45. PubMed ID: 23931633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accounting for occurrences: a new view of the use of contingency information in causal judgment.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):204-18. PubMed ID: 18194063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Asking better questions: How presentation formats influence information search.
    Wu CM; Meder B; Filimon F; Nelson JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1274-1297. PubMed ID: 28318286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A quantum probability account of order effects in inference.
    Trueblood JS; Busemeyer JR
    Cogn Sci; 2011; 35(8):1518-52. PubMed ID: 21951058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic causal reasoning with verbal information.
    Meder B; Mayrhofer R
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Aug; 96():54-84. PubMed ID: 28623726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disabling conditional inferences: an EEG study.
    Bonnefond M; Kaliuzhna M; Van der Henst JB; De Neys W
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Apr; 56():255-62. PubMed ID: 24508764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying expectations about the strength of causal relationships.
    Yeung S; Griffiths TL
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 Feb; 76():1-29. PubMed ID: 25522277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of explanatory considerations in updating.
    Douven I; Schupbach JN
    Cognition; 2015 Sep; 142():299-311. PubMed ID: 26069937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Driven by power? Probe question and presentation format effects on causal judgment.
    Perales JC; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1482-94. PubMed ID: 18980409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fluent, fast, and frugal? A formal model evaluation of the interplay between memory, fluency, and comparative judgments.
    Hilbig BE; Erdfelder E; Pohl RF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):827-39. PubMed ID: 21355665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.