These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24913496)

  • 1. The effects of nutrition labeling on consumer food choice: a psychological experiment and computational model.
    Helfer P; Shultz TR
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2014 Dec; 1331():174-185. PubMed ID: 24913496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can front-of-pack labelling schemes guide healthier food choices? Australian shoppers' responses to seven labelling formats.
    Watson WL; Kelly B; Hector D; Hughes C; King L; Crawford J; Sergeant J; Chapman K
    Appetite; 2014 Jan; 72():90-7. PubMed ID: 24126243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single-larger-portion-size and dual-column nutrition labeling may help consumers make more healthful food choices.
    Lando AM; Lo SC
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2013 Feb; 113(2):241-50. PubMed ID: 23351627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Who Buys Products with Nutrition and Health Claims? A Purchase Simulation with Eye Tracking on the Influence of Consumers' Nutrition Knowledge and Health Motivation.
    Steinhauser J; Janssen M; Hamm U
    Nutrients; 2019 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 31547369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improvements in recall and food choices using a graphical method to deliver information of select nutrients.
    Pratt NS; Ellison BD; Benjamin AS; Nakamura MT
    Nutr Res; 2016 Jan; 36(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 26773780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The growing role of front-of-pack nutrition profile labeling: a consumer perspective on key issues and controversies.
    Kleef EV; Dagevos H
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2015; 55(3):291-303. PubMed ID: 24915389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of Different Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels on Consumer Purchasing Intentions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Ducrot P; Julia C; Méjean C; Kesse-Guyot E; Touvier M; Fezeu LK; Hercberg S; Péneau S
    Am J Prev Med; 2016 May; 50(5):627-636. PubMed ID: 26699246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of nutrition label format and product assortment on the healthfulness of food choice.
    Aschemann-Witzel J; Grunert KG; van Trijp HC; Bialkova S; Raats MM; Hodgkins C; Wasowicz-Kirylo G; Koenigstorfer J
    Appetite; 2013 Dec; 71():63-74. PubMed ID: 23891558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Obtaining consumer perspectives using a citizens' jury: does the current country of origin labelling in Australia allow for informed food choices?
    Withall E; Wilson AM; Henderson J; Tonkin E; Coveney J; Meyer SB; Clark J; McCullum D; Ankeny R; Ward PR
    BMC Public Health; 2016 Dec; 16(1):1241. PubMed ID: 27938403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Back-of-pack information in substitutive food choices: A process-tracking study in participants intending to eat healthy.
    van Buul VJ; Bolman CAW; Brouns FJPH; Lechner L
    Appetite; 2017 Sep; 116():173-183. PubMed ID: 28472643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of food labelling systems on food choices and eating behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies.
    Cecchini M; Warin L
    Obes Rev; 2016 Mar; 17(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 26693944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consumer Acceptance of Population-Level Intervention Strategies for Healthy Food Choices: The Role of Perceived Effectiveness and Perceived Fairness.
    Bos C; Lans IV; Van Rijnsoever F; Van Trijp H
    Nutrients; 2015 Sep; 7(9):7842-62. PubMed ID: 26389949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Front-of-pack nutrition labels. Their effect on attention and choices when consumers have varying goals and time constraints.
    van Herpen E; Trijp HC
    Appetite; 2011 Aug; 57(1):148-60. PubMed ID: 21554909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving the design of nutrition labels to promote healthier food choices and reasonable portion sizes.
    Roberto CA; Khandpur N
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2014 Jul; 38 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S25-33. PubMed ID: 25033961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consumer heterogeneity in sugar consumption with special reference to fat and cholesterol intake.
    Asirvatham J; McNamara PE
    Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2018 Feb; 69(1):108-116. PubMed ID: 28610456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Potential problems with increasing serving sizes on the Nutrition Facts label.
    Dallas SK; Liu PJ; Ubel PA
    Appetite; 2015 Dec; 95():577-84. PubMed ID: 26278876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of front-of-package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers.
    Hersey JC; Wohlgenant KC; Arsenault JE; Kosa KM; Muth MK
    Nutr Rev; 2013 Jan; 71(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 23282247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy and consumer preferences for different approaches to calorie labeling on menus.
    Pang J; Hammond D
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2013; 45(6):669-75. PubMed ID: 23928179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nudging Our Way to a Healthier Population: The Effect of Calorie Labeling and Self-Control on Menu Choices of Emerging Adults.
    Rising CJ; Bol N
    Health Commun; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1032-1038. PubMed ID: 27676393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benchmarks and Blinders: How Canadian Women Utilize the Nutrition Facts Table.
    Dukeshire S; Nicks E
    Can J Diet Pract Res; 2017 Jun; 78(2):53-58. PubMed ID: 28145768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.