These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24914007)

  • 1. The intermediates take it all: asymptotics of higher criticism statistics and a powerful alternative based on equal local levels.
    Gontscharuk V; Landwehr S; Finner H
    Biom J; 2015 Jan; 57(1):159-80. PubMed ID: 24914007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimal Stein-type goodness-of-fit tests for count data.
    Weiß CH; Puig P; Aleksandrov B
    Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2200073. PubMed ID: 36166681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Weighted Kolmogorov-Smirnov test: accounting for the tails.
    Chicheportiche R; Bouchaud JP
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2012 Oct; 86(4 Pt 1):041115. PubMed ID: 23214537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci: common tests vs. the asymptotically most powerful test.
    Schaid DJ; Nick TG
    Genet Epidemiol; 1990; 7(5):359-70. PubMed ID: 2253870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new powerful nonparametric rank test for ordered alternative problem.
    Shan G; Young D; Kang L
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112924. PubMed ID: 25405757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Goodness-of-fit testing for accident models with low means.
    Ye Z; Zhang Y; Lord D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Dec; 61():78-86. PubMed ID: 23219076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Type I errors and power of the parametric bootstrap goodness-of-fit test: full and limited information.
    Tollenaar N; Mooijaart A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):271-88. PubMed ID: 14633336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Weighted Kolmogorov Smirnov testing: an alternative for Gene Set Enrichment Analysis.
    Charmpi K; Ycart B
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2015 Jun; 14(3):279-93. PubMed ID: 26030794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gene set analysis for GWAS: assessing the use of modified Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistics.
    Debrabant B; Soerensen M
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2014 Oct; 13(5):553-66. PubMed ID: 25153606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating the pi* goodness of fit index for finite mixtures of item response models.
    Revuelta J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):93-113. PubMed ID: 18482477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The choice of a statistic for testing hypotheses regarding seasonality.
    Reijneveld SA
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1990 Oct; 83(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 2248377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improved sib-pair linkage test for disease susceptibility loci.
    Faraway JJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1993; 10(4):225-33. PubMed ID: 8224803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Goodness-of-fit testing using components based on marginal frequencies of multinomial data.
    Reiser M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):331-60. PubMed ID: 17535483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Construction of null statistics in permutation-based multiple testing for multi-factorial microarray experiments.
    Gao X
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(12):1486-94. PubMed ID: 16574697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A likelihood ratio statistic for testing goodness of fit with randomly censored data.
    Turnbull BW; Weiss L
    Biometrics; 1978 Sep; 34(3):367-75. PubMed ID: 719120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tests of independence for bivariate survival data.
    Shih JH; Louis TA
    Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1440-9. PubMed ID: 8962462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modified Distribution-Free Goodness-of-Fit Test Statistic.
    Chun SY; Browne MW; Shapiro A
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):48-66. PubMed ID: 28597361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Global tests for linkage.
    el Galta R; van Houwelingen HC; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ
    Biom J; 2009 Feb; 51(1):70-83. PubMed ID: 19197957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analytic P-value calculation for the higher criticism test in finite
    Barnett IJ; Lin X
    Biometrika; 2014; 101(4):964-970. PubMed ID: 25750439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Weaknesses of goodness-of-fit tests for evaluating propensity score models: the case of the omitted confounder.
    Weitzen S; Lapane KL; Toledano AY; Hume AL; Mor V
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2005 Apr; 14(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 15386700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.