These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
620 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24914773)
1. The accuracy and precision of DXA for assessing body composition in team sport athletes. Bilsborough JC; Greenway K; Opar D; Livingstone S; Cordy J; Coutts AJ J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(19):1821-8. PubMed ID: 24914773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Agreement between dual x-ray absorptiometers using pencil beam and fan beam: indicators of bone health and whole-body plus appendicular tissue composition in adult athletes. Tavares Ó; Duarte JP; Costa DC; Sousa-E-Silva P; Martinho D; Lus LGO; Duarte-Mendes P; Valente-Dos-Santos J; Conde J; Casanova JM; Cyrino ES; Coelho-E-Silva MJ Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2018 Apr; 64(4):330-338. PubMed ID: 30133612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone mineral and body composition measurements: cross-calibration of pencil-beam and fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers. Ellis KJ; Shypailo RJ J Bone Miner Res; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1613-8. PubMed ID: 9783550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Seasonal DXA-measured body composition changes in professional male soccer players. Milanese C; Cavedon V; Corradini G; De Vita F; Zancanaro C J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(12):1219-28. PubMed ID: 25773172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Body composition analysis by dual X-ray absorptiometry: in vivo and in vitro comparison of three different fan-beam instruments. Aasen G; Fagertun H; Halse J Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2006; 66(8):659-66. PubMed ID: 17101558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) by comparison with chemical analysis of dogs and cats. Speakman JR; Booles D; Butterwick R Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Mar; 25(3):439-47. PubMed ID: 11319644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Body composition in taller individuals using DXA: A validation study for athletic and non-athletic populations. Santos DA; Gobbo LA; Matias CN; Petroski EL; Gonçalves EM; Cyrino ES; Minderico CS; Sardinha LB; Silva AM J Sports Sci; 2013; 31(4):405-13. PubMed ID: 23092580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparisons between a pencil beam and two fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue. Tothill P; Hannan WJ; Wilkinson S Br J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 74(878):166-76. PubMed ID: 11718390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the effectiveness of 2 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers with that of total body water and computed tomography in assessing changes in body composition during weight change. Tylavsky FA; Lohman TG; Dockrell M; Lang T; Schoeller DA; Wan JY; Fuerst T; Cauley JA; Nevitt M; Harris TB Am J Clin Nutr; 2003 Feb; 77(2):356-63. PubMed ID: 12540394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Precision Error in Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Body Composition Measurements in Elite Male Rugby League Players. Barlow MJ; Oldroyd B; Smith D; Lees MJ; Brightmore A; Till K; Jones B; Hind K J Clin Densitom; 2015; 18(4):546-50. PubMed ID: 26072358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hologic QDR 2000 whole-body scans: a comparison of three combinations of scan modes and analysis software. Spector E; LeBlanc A; Shackelford L Osteoporos Int; 1995; 5(6):440-5. PubMed ID: 8695965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The intra- and inter-instrument reliability of DXA based on ex vivo soft tissue measurements. Guo Y; Franks PW; Brookshire T; Antonio Tataranni P Obes Res; 2004 Dec; 12(12):1925-9. PubMed ID: 15687392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans. Blake GM; Parker JC; Buxton FM; Fogelman I Br J Radiol; 1993 Oct; 66(790):902-6. PubMed ID: 8220974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of fan beam dual energy x ray absorptiometry for body composition assessment in adults aged 18-45 years. Norcross J; Van Loan MD Br J Sports Med; 2004 Aug; 38(4):472-6. PubMed ID: 15273189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Precision and accuracy of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for determining in vivo body composition of mice. Nagy TR; Clair AL Obes Res; 2000 Aug; 8(5):392-8. PubMed ID: 10968731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone mineral density among female sports participants. Egan E; Reilly T; Giacomoni M; Redmond L; Turner C Bone; 2006 Feb; 38(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 16257279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo measurement of human body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Thomsen TK; Jensen VJ; Henriksen MG Eur J Surg; 1998 Feb; 164(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 9537721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of fan beam dual energy x-ray absorptiometry to measure body composition of piglets. Koo WW; Hammami M; Hockman EM J Nutr; 2002 Jun; 132(6):1380-3. PubMed ID: 12042462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Regional body composition: cross-calibration of DXA scanners--QDR4500W and Discovery Wi. Covey MK; Berry JK; Hacker ED Obesity (Silver Spring); 2010 Mar; 18(3):632-7. PubMed ID: 19960003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measured regional body composition least significant change: effect of region of interest and gender in athletes. Buehring B; Krueger D; Libber J; Heiderscheit B; Sanfilippo J; Johnson B; Haller I; Binkley N J Clin Densitom; 2014; 17(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 23643968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]