BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

623 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24914773)

  • 1. The accuracy and precision of DXA for assessing body composition in team sport athletes.
    Bilsborough JC; Greenway K; Opar D; Livingstone S; Cordy J; Coutts AJ
    J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(19):1821-8. PubMed ID: 24914773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Agreement between dual x-ray absorptiometers using pencil beam and fan beam: indicators of bone health and whole-body plus appendicular tissue composition in adult athletes.
    Tavares Ó; Duarte JP; Costa DC; Sousa-E-Silva P; Martinho D; Lus LGO; Duarte-Mendes P; Valente-Dos-Santos J; Conde J; Casanova JM; Cyrino ES; Coelho-E-Silva MJ
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2018 Apr; 64(4):330-338. PubMed ID: 30133612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bone mineral and body composition measurements: cross-calibration of pencil-beam and fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers.
    Ellis KJ; Shypailo RJ
    J Bone Miner Res; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1613-8. PubMed ID: 9783550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Seasonal DXA-measured body composition changes in professional male soccer players.
    Milanese C; Cavedon V; Corradini G; De Vita F; Zancanaro C
    J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(12):1219-28. PubMed ID: 25773172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Body composition analysis by dual X-ray absorptiometry: in vivo and in vitro comparison of three different fan-beam instruments.
    Aasen G; Fagertun H; Halse J
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2006; 66(8):659-66. PubMed ID: 17101558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) by comparison with chemical analysis of dogs and cats.
    Speakman JR; Booles D; Butterwick R
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Mar; 25(3):439-47. PubMed ID: 11319644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Body composition in taller individuals using DXA: A validation study for athletic and non-athletic populations.
    Santos DA; Gobbo LA; Matias CN; Petroski EL; Gonçalves EM; Cyrino ES; Minderico CS; Sardinha LB; Silva AM
    J Sports Sci; 2013; 31(4):405-13. PubMed ID: 23092580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparisons between a pencil beam and two fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue.
    Tothill P; Hannan WJ; Wilkinson S
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 74(878):166-76. PubMed ID: 11718390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the effectiveness of 2 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers with that of total body water and computed tomography in assessing changes in body composition during weight change.
    Tylavsky FA; Lohman TG; Dockrell M; Lang T; Schoeller DA; Wan JY; Fuerst T; Cauley JA; Nevitt M; Harris TB
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2003 Feb; 77(2):356-63. PubMed ID: 12540394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Precision Error in Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Body Composition Measurements in Elite Male Rugby League Players.
    Barlow MJ; Oldroyd B; Smith D; Lees MJ; Brightmore A; Till K; Jones B; Hind K
    J Clin Densitom; 2015; 18(4):546-50. PubMed ID: 26072358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hologic QDR 2000 whole-body scans: a comparison of three combinations of scan modes and analysis software.
    Spector E; LeBlanc A; Shackelford L
    Osteoporos Int; 1995; 5(6):440-5. PubMed ID: 8695965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The intra- and inter-instrument reliability of DXA based on ex vivo soft tissue measurements.
    Guo Y; Franks PW; Brookshire T; Antonio Tataranni P
    Obes Res; 2004 Dec; 12(12):1925-9. PubMed ID: 15687392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans.
    Blake GM; Parker JC; Buxton FM; Fogelman I
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Oct; 66(790):902-6. PubMed ID: 8220974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of fan beam dual energy x ray absorptiometry for body composition assessment in adults aged 18-45 years.
    Norcross J; Van Loan MD
    Br J Sports Med; 2004 Aug; 38(4):472-6. PubMed ID: 15273189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Precision and accuracy of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for determining in vivo body composition of mice.
    Nagy TR; Clair AL
    Obes Res; 2000 Aug; 8(5):392-8. PubMed ID: 10968731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bone mineral density among female sports participants.
    Egan E; Reilly T; Giacomoni M; Redmond L; Turner C
    Bone; 2006 Feb; 38(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 16257279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vivo measurement of human body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
    Thomsen TK; Jensen VJ; Henriksen MG
    Eur J Surg; 1998 Feb; 164(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 9537721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of fan beam dual energy x-ray absorptiometry to measure body composition of piglets.
    Koo WW; Hammami M; Hockman EM
    J Nutr; 2002 Jun; 132(6):1380-3. PubMed ID: 12042462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Regional body composition: cross-calibration of DXA scanners--QDR4500W and Discovery Wi.
    Covey MK; Berry JK; Hacker ED
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2010 Mar; 18(3):632-7. PubMed ID: 19960003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measured regional body composition least significant change: effect of region of interest and gender in athletes.
    Buehring B; Krueger D; Libber J; Heiderscheit B; Sanfilippo J; Johnson B; Haller I; Binkley N
    J Clin Densitom; 2014; 17(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 23643968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.