These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24914861)

  • 1. [Barriers for introducing a health technology assessment organization to inform health care decision-making in the Spanish National Health System].
    Artells JJ; Peiró S; Meneu R
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2014; 88(2):217-31. PubMed ID: 24914861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [In healthcare, more or less, less is more: notes on healthcare disinvestment].
    Peiró S
    Rev Esp Sanid Penit; 2014; 16(3):68-74. PubMed ID: 25418826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Prioritising measures for consolidating shared decision-making in the services rendered by the Spanish National Health System].
    García-Altés A; Peiró M; Artells JJ
    Gac Sanit; 2019; 33(5):408-414. PubMed ID: 30033094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 6: investigating methods to identify, prioritise, implement and evaluate disinvestment projects in a local healthcare setting.
    Harris C; Allen K; Brooke V; Dyer T; Waller C; King R; Ramsey W; Mortimer D
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 May; 17(1):370. PubMed ID: 28545430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Identification and prioritization of interventions to improve efficiency in the National Health System].
    Peiró S; Artells JJ; Meneu R
    Gac Sanit; 2011; 25(2):95-105. PubMed ID: 21397364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating mental health care and policy in Spain.
    Salvador-Carulla L; Costa-Font J; Cabases J; McDaid D; Alonso J
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2010 Jun; 13(2):73-86. PubMed ID: 20919594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of NICE technology appraisal in NHS rationing.
    Walker S; Palmer S; Sculpher M
    Br Med Bull; 2007; 81-82():51-64. PubMed ID: 17409119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of health economic evaluations in Sweden.
    Heintz E; Arnberg K; Levin LÅ; Liliemark J; Davidson T
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2014; 108(7):375-82. PubMed ID: 25444295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Explicit and implicit rationing: taking responsibility and avoiding blame for health care choices.
    Ham C; Coulter A
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2001 Jul; 6(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 11467274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences in cancer drug assessment between Spain and the United Kingdom.
    Lozano-Blázquez A; Dickson R; Fraga-Fuentes MD; Martínez-Martínez F; Calleja-Hernández MÁ
    Eur J Cancer; 2015 Sep; 51(13):1843-52. PubMed ID: 26119375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Healthcare rationing in Spain: framework, descriptive analysis and consequences.
    Rodríguez-Monguió R; Antoñanzas Villar F
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2006; 24(6):537-48. PubMed ID: 16761902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Public healthcare resource allocation and the Rule of Rescue.
    Cookson R; McCabe C; Tsuchiya A
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Jul; 34(7):540-4. PubMed ID: 18591290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Governability of the Spanish national health system: improving the balance between the benefits and costs of decentralization. 2008 SESPAS Report].
    Repullo JR; Freire JM
    Gac Sanit; 2008 Apr; 22 Suppl 1():118-25. PubMed ID: 18405561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Case studies that illustrate disinvestment and resource allocation decision-making processes in health care: a systematic review.
    Polisena J; Clifford T; Elshaug AG; Mitton C; Russell E; Skidmore B
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2013 Apr; 29(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 23514665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness in political--administrative decision-making in specialized healthcare.
    Simonen O; Vtanen E; Konu A; Blom M
    Scand J Public Health; 2009 Jul; 37(5):494-502. PubMed ID: 19506006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions.
    Drummond MF; Schwartz JS; Jönsson B; Luce BR; Neumann PJ; Siebert U; Sullivan SD
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(3):244-58; discussion 362-8. PubMed ID: 18601792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Criteria and procedures for determining benefit packages in health care. A comparative perspective.
    Gress S; Niebuhr D; Rothgang H; Wasem J
    Health Policy; 2005 Jul; 73(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 15911059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A difficult balancing act: policy actors' perspectives on using economic evaluation to inform health-care coverage decisions under the Universal Health Insurance Coverage scheme in Thailand.
    Teerawattananon Y; Russell S
    Value Health; 2008 Mar; 11 Suppl 1():S52-60. PubMed ID: 18387068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development, implementation and evaluation of an evidence-based program for introduction of new health technologies and clinical practices in a local healthcare setting.
    Harris C; Garrubba M; Allen K; King R; Kelly C; Thiagarajan M; Castleman B; Ramsey W; Farjou D
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Dec; 15():575. PubMed ID: 26707549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.