262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24915801)
21. Multicenter evaluation of the cobas m 511 integrated hematology analyzer.
Bruegel M; George TI; Feng B; Allen TR; Bracco D; Zahniser DJ; Russcher H
Int J Lab Hematol; 2018 Dec; 40(6):672-682. PubMed ID: 30030894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Utility of microsemi LC-667CRP in point of care testing system for acute inflammatory disease].
Inaba T; Yuasa S; Taniguchi H; Nakashima K; Nagaoka H; Fujita N
Rinsho Byori; 2010 Jul; 58(7):664-9. PubMed ID: 20715509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of hematological values obtained with reference automated hematology analyzers of six manufacturers.
Takubo T; Tatsumi N; Satoh N; Matsuno K; Fujimoto K; Soga M; Yamagami Y; Akiba S; Sudoh T; Miyazaki M
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2002; 33 Suppl 2():62-7. PubMed ID: 12755270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Current status and proposal of a guideline for manual slide review of automated complete blood cell count and white blood cell differential].
Woo HY; Shin SY; Park H; Kim YJ; Kim HJ; Lee YK; Chae SL; Chang YH; Choi JR; Han K; Cho SR; Kwon KC
Korean J Lab Med; 2010 Dec; 30(6):559-66. PubMed ID: 21157139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Performance evaluation of the Sysmex pocH-100i automated hematology analyzer.
Whisler S; Dahlgren C
Lab Hematol; 2005; 11(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 16024334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Performance Evaluation of the Mindray BC 6800 Hematology Analyzer and Flag Comparison with the XE-2100 and Manual Microscopy.
Xiang D; Yue J; Sha C; Ren S; Li M; Wang C
Clin Lab; 2019 Apr; 65(4):. PubMed ID: 30969092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Performance Evaluation of a New Generation of Automated Analyzer for Pleural and Peritoneal Fluids Cytology.
Bottini PV; Garlipp CR; Nogueira BF; Pompeo DB; Souza MI
Clin Lab; 2018 Oct; 64(10):1783-1786. PubMed ID: 30336515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Analytic performance of the PENTRA 80 automated blood cell analyzer for the evaluation of normal and pathologic WBCs.
Arroyo ME; Tabernero MD; García-Marcos MA; Orfao A
Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Feb; 123(2):206-14. PubMed ID: 15842044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of the impedance analyzer PocH-100iV Diff for analysis of canine and feline blood.
Bauer NB; Nakagawa J; Dunker C; Failing K; Moritz A
Vet Clin Pathol; 2012 Jun; 41(2):194-206. PubMed ID: 22324888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Performance evaluation of Sysmex XN hematology analyzer in umbilical cord blood: a comparison study with Sysmex XE-2100.
Kim H; Hur M; Choi SG; Moon HW; Yun YM; Hwang HS; Kwon HS; Sohn IS
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2014 Dec; 52(12):1771-9. PubMed ID: 24978899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Performance evaluation of Abbott CELL-DYN Ruby for routine use.
Lehto T; Hedberg P
Int J Lab Hematol; 2008 Oct; 30(5):400-7. PubMed ID: 19046315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Laboratory evaluation of the Sysmex SE-9500 automated haematology analyser.
Peng L; Gao X; Jiang H; Peng Z; Su J
Clin Lab Haematol; 2001 Aug; 23(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 11683784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Abnormal neutrophil scattergram obtained using Pentra MS CRP in the patients with myelodysplastic syndrome showing dysgranulopoiesis.
Inaba T; Ishizuka K; Yuasa S; Mishima N; Ogura K; Saito K; Kohno T; Fujitomo Y; Nakanishi M; Fujita N
Int J Lab Hematol; 2016 Feb; 38(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 26333345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Validation of the Celltac alpha automated hematology analyzer for canine and feline blood samples.
McDaniel BJ; Hirschberger J; Weber K
Vet Clin Pathol; 2013 Mar; 42(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 23278503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Performance evaluation of the digital cell imaging analyzer DI-60 integrated into the fully automated Sysmex XN hematology analyzer system.
Tabe Y; Yamamoto T; Maenou I; Nakai R; Idei M; Horii T; Miida T; Ohsaka A
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 Feb; 53(2):281-9. PubMed ID: 25153399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The international consensus group for hematology review: suggested criteria for action following automated CBC and WBC differential analysis.
Barnes PW; McFadden SL; Machin SJ; Simson E;
Lab Hematol; 2005; 11(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 16024331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. HemoScreen hematology analyzer compared to Sysmex XN for complete blood count, white blood cell differential, and detection of leukocyte abnormalities.
Linko-Parvinen AM; Keränen K; Kurvinen K; Tienhaara A
EJHaem; 2022 Nov; 3(4):1126-1134. PubMed ID: 36467845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A Comparison of Mindray BC-6800, Sysmex XN-2000, and Beckman Coulter LH750 Automated Hematology Analyzers: A Pediatric Study.
Ciepiela O; Kotuła I; Kierat S; Sieczkowska S; Podsiadłowska A; Jenczelewska A; Księżarczyk K; Demkow U
J Clin Lab Anal; 2016 Nov; 30(6):1128-1134. PubMed ID: 27184780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Optimization of laboratory workflow in clinical hematology laboratory with reduced manual slide review: comparison between Sysmex XE-2100 and ABX Pentra DX120.
Hur M; Cho JH; Kim H; Hong MH; Moon HW; Yun YM; Kim JQ
Int J Lab Hematol; 2011 Aug; 33(4):434-40. PubMed ID: 21418541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Multicenter performance evaluation of the Abbott Alinity hq hematology analyzer.
Slim CL; Wevers BA; Demmers MWHJ; Lakos G; Hoffmann JJML; Adriaansen HJ; Kooren JA; Storm H
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2019 Nov; 57(12):1988-1998. PubMed ID: 31339851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
