BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

449 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24915811)

  • 1. [Assessment of HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer: a comparison of dual-color in-situ hybridization and fluorescence in-situ hybridization].
    Xu Y; Yang W; Yang F; Lu Y; Cai X; Zhou X
    Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Apr; 43(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 24915811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bright-field HER2 dual in situ hybridization (DISH) assay vs fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): focused study of immunohistochemical 2+ cases.
    Gao FF; Dabbs DJ; Cooper KL; Bhargava R
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2014 Jan; 141(1):102-10. PubMed ID: 24343743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and dual-ISH (DISH) in the determination of HER2 status in breast cancer.
    Mansfield AS; Sukov WR; Eckel-Passow JE; Sakai Y; Walsh FJ; Lonzo M; Wiktor AE; Dogan A; Jenkins RB
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Feb; 139(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 23355198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [HER-2 oncogene amplification assessment in invasive breast cancer by dual-color in situ hybridization (dc-CISH): a comparative study with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)].
    Akhdar A; Bronsard M; Lemieux R; Geha S
    Ann Pathol; 2011 Dec; 31(6):472-9. PubMed ID: 22172120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of dual-color in-situ hybridization and fluorescence in-situ hybridization in HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer.
    Horii R; Matsuura M; Iwase T; Ito Y; Akiyama F
    Breast Cancer; 2014 Sep; 21(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 23307494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison between analysis of HER2 gene and chromosome 17 in breast cancer by dual-probe chromogenic in situ hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization].
    Bai YF; Ren GP; Wang B; Teng LS; Liu X
    Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Mar; 39(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 20450761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Analysis of HER2 status in breast carcinoma using fully automated HER2 staining and fluorescence in-situ hybridization technology].
    Ying JM; Liu XY; Guo L; Xie YQ; Lü N
    Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2012 May; 41(5):296-300. PubMed ID: 22883666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Updated 2013 College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncology (CAP/ASCO) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) testing increase HER2 positive and HER2 equivocal breast cancer cases; retrospective study of HER2 FISH results of 836 invasive breast cancers.
    Singh K; Tantravahi U; Lomme MM; Pasquariello T; Steinhoff M; Sung CJ
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jun; 157(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 27180259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of HER2 gene amplification in invasive breast cancer using a dual-color chromogenic in situ hybridization (dual CISH).
    Kato N; Itoh H; Serizawa A; Hatanaka Y; Umemura S; Osamura RY
    Pathol Int; 2010 Jul; 60(7):510-5. PubMed ID: 20594272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dual-color dual-hapten in situ hybridization (D-DISH) - Comparison with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for HER2/neu testing in breast cancer.
    Gajaria PK; Tambe S; Pai T; Patil A; Desai SB; Shet TM
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2020; 63(2):194-199. PubMed ID: 32317514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of HER2 Dual-Color and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Breast Cancer:  A Cohort Study Emphasizing Equivocal Cases.
    Shao T; Wood M; Wing A; Hnatovska M; Mendes M; Brendan Mullen J; Chang MC
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2016 Sep; 146(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 27543979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the 2007 and 2013 ASCO/CAP evaluation systems for HER2 amplification in breast cancer.
    Pu X; Shi J; Li Z; Feng A; Ye Q
    Pathol Res Pract; 2015 Jun; 211(6):421-5. PubMed ID: 25818873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implications of the Updated 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Gene Testing Using Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Breast Cancer.
    Lim TH; Lim AS; Thike AA; Tien SL; Tan PH
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Feb; 140(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 26910218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of the 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 Guideline Updates at an Academic Medical Center That Performs Primary HER2 FISH Testing: Increase in Equivocal Results and Utility of Reflex Immunohistochemistry.
    Muller KE; Marotti JD; Memoli VA; Wells WA; Tafe LJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2015 Aug; 144(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 26185309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. HER2 FISH classification of equivocal HER2 IHC breast cancers with use of the 2013 ASCO/CAP practice guideline.
    Fan YS; Casas CE; Peng J; Watkins M; Fan L; Chapman J; Ikpatt OF; Gomez C; Zhao W; Reis IM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Feb; 155(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 26895325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gene protein detection platform--a comparison of a new human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 assay with conventional immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization platforms.
    Stålhammar G; Farrajota P; Olsson A; Silva C; Hartman J; Elmberger G
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2015 Aug; 19(4):203-10. PubMed ID: 25921313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. HER2 equivocal breast cancer that is positive by alternative probe HER2 FISH are classified as HER2 negative by Oncotype DX.
    Tozbikian GH; Zynger DL
    Breast J; 2018 Jul; 24(4):535-540. PubMed ID: 29498449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Silver in situ hybridization (SISH) for determination of HER2 gene status in breast carcinoma: comparison with FISH and assessment of interobserver reproducibility.
    Papouchado BG; Myles J; Lloyd RV; Stoler M; Oliveira AM; Downs-Kelly E; Morey A; Bilous M; Nagle R; Prescott N; Wang L; Dragovich L; McElhinny A; Garcia CF; Ranger-Moore J; Free H; Powell W; Loftus M; Pettay J; Gaire F; Roberts C; Dietel M; Roche P; Grogan T; Tubbs R
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Jun; 34(6):767-76. PubMed ID: 20421783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of molecular subtypes for the increased HER2 equivocal cases caused by application of the updated 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 testing guidelines in breast cancer.
    Guo L; Yuan P; Zhang J; Ling Y; Li W; Zhao B; Ying J; Xuan L
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 28712009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of HER2/Neu status by fluorescence in situ hybridization in immunohistochemistry-equivocal cases of invasive ductal carcinoma and aberrant signal patterns: a study at a tertiary cancer center.
    Murthy SS; Sandhya DG; Ahmed F; Goud KI; Dayal M; Suseela K; Rajappa SJ
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2011; 54(3):532-8. PubMed ID: 21934215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.