223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24916480)
21. Breast reconstruction in women under 30: a 10-year experience.
Ellsworth WA; Bass BL; Skoracki RJ; Heller L
Breast J; 2011; 17(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 21155919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An assessment of the risks and benefits of immediate autologous breast reconstruction in patients undergoing postmastectomy radiation therapy.
Mirzabeigi MN; Smartt JM; Nelson JA; Fosnot J; Serletti JM; Wu LC
Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Aug; 71(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 23542828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Early Years of Practice: An Assessment of Operative Efficiency and Cost of Free Flap and Implant Breast Reconstruction at an Academic Institution.
Sando IC; Momoh AO; Chung KC; Kozlow JH
J Reconstr Microsurg; 2016 Jul; 32(6):445-54. PubMed ID: 26872025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Perforator flap breast reconstruction after unsatisfactory implant reconstruction.
Levine SM; Lester ME; Fontenot B; Allen RJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2011 May; 66(5):513-7. PubMed ID: 21301299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparing thirty-day outcomes in prosthetic and autologous breast reconstruction: a multivariate analysis of 13,082 patients?
Mioton LM; Smetona JT; Hanwright PJ; Seth AK; Wang E; Bilimoria KY; Gaido J; Fine NA; Kim JY
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Jul; 66(7):917-25. PubMed ID: 23562485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Time to completion of nipple reconstruction: what factors are involved?
Losken A; Duggal CS; Desai KA; McCullough MC; Gruszynski MA; Carlson GW
Ann Plast Surg; 2013 May; 70(5):530-2. PubMed ID: 23542858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Radiotherapy in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: risk factors, surgical outcomes, and patient-reported outcome measures in a large Swedish multicenter cohort.
Eriksson M; Anveden L; Celebioglu F; Dahlberg K; Meldahl I; Lagergren J; Eriksen C; de Boniface J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Dec; 142(3):591-601. PubMed ID: 24258257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cost analysis of postmastectomy reconstruction: A comparison of two staged implant reconstruction using tissue expander and acellular dermal matrix with abdominal based perforator free flaps.
Tran BNN; Fadayomi A; Lin SJ; Singhal D; Lee BT; Lee BT; Nahabedian MY
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 116(4):448-449. PubMed ID: 28591935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Cost-effectiveness analysis of implants versus autologous perforator flaps using the BREAST-Q.
Matros E; Albornoz CR; Razdan SN; Mehrara BJ; Macadam SA; Ro T; McCarthy CM; Disa JJ; Cordeiro PG; Pusic AL
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Apr; 135(4):937-946. PubMed ID: 25517411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Does the reconstruction method influence development of mastectomy flap complications in nipple-sparing mastectomy?
Lee KT; Pyon JK; Bang SI; Lee JE; Nam SJ; Mun GH
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1543-50. PubMed ID: 23834909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction.
Lanier ST; Wang ED; Chen JJ; Arora BP; Katz SM; Gelfand MA; Khan SU; Dagum AB; Bui DT
Ann Plast Surg; 2010 May; 64(5):674-8. PubMed ID: 20395795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Funding analysis of bilateral autologous free-flap breast reconstructions in Australia.
Sinha S; Ruskin O; McCombe D; Morrison W; Webb A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Aug; 68(8):1120-6. PubMed ID: 26159470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cost and outcome analysis of breast reconstruction paradigm shift.
Fitzpatrick AM; Gao LL; Smith BL; Cetrulo CL; Colwell AS; Winograd JM; Yaremchuk MJ; Austen WG; Liao EC
Ann Plast Surg; 2014 Aug; 73(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 23407253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reexamining free flap breast reconstruction in the community and university setting: is there a difference?
Nelson JA; Stransky CA; Fischer JP; Fosnot J; Serletti JM; Wu LC
Ann Plast Surg; 2014 Dec; 73 Suppl 2():S171-4. PubMed ID: 25046665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Outcomes Following Breast Reconstruction in Patients With Prior Mantle Radiation for Treatment of Hodgkin's Lymphoma.
Freniere B; Irwin T; Guldbrandsen G; Lafleur EH; Dominici L; Sturgeon D; Chun YS
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 May; 84(5):507-511. PubMed ID: 31663939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The role of autologous fat grafting in secondary microsurgical breast reconstruction.
Weichman KE; Broer PN; Tanna N; Wilson SC; Allan A; Levine JP; Ahn C; Choi M; Karp NS; Allen R
Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Jul; 71(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 23788122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Classification and management of seromas in immediate breast reconstruction using the tissue expander and acellular dermal matrix technique.
Brzezienski MA; Jarrell JA; Mooty RC
Ann Plast Surg; 2013 May; 70(5):488-92. PubMed ID: 23542848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Breast reconstruction in older women.
August DA; Wilkins E; Rea T
Surgery; 1994 Jun; 115(6):663-8. PubMed ID: 8197555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Breast reconstruction using permanent Becker expander implants: an 18 year experience.
Goh SC; Thorne AL; Williams G; Laws SA; Rainsbury RM
Breast; 2012 Dec; 21(6):764-8. PubMed ID: 22497782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Outcomes evaluation following bilateral breast reconstruction using latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps.
Losken A; Nicholas CS; Pinell XA; Carlson GW
Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Jul; 65(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 20548235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
