These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24916647)

  • 1. To disclose, or not to disclose? Context matters.
    Rahimzadeh V; Avard D; Sénécal K; Knoppers BM; Sinnett D
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2015 Mar; 23(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 24916647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The law of incidental findings in human subjects research: establishing researchers' duties.
    Wolf SM; Paradise J; Caga-anan C
    J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(2):361-83, 214. PubMed ID: 18547206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Research participants in NGS studies want to know about incidental findings.
    Jelsig AM; Qvist N; Brusgaard K; Ousager LB
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2015 Oct; 23(10):1423-6. PubMed ID: 25604854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disclosure of incidental findings in cancer genomic research: investigators' perceptions on obligations and barriers.
    Kleiderman E; Avard D; Besso A; Ali-Khan S; Sauvageau G; Hébert J
    Clin Genet; 2015 Oct; 88(4):320-6. PubMed ID: 25492269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethical values supporting the disclosure of incidental and secondary findings in clinical genomic testing: a qualitative study.
    Saelaert M; Mertes H; Moerenhout T; De Baere E; Devisch I
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):9. PubMed ID: 32000764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. To disclose, or not to disclose? Perspectives of clinical genomics professionals toward returning incidental findings from genomic research.
    AlFayyad I; Al-Tannir M; Abu-Shaheen A; AlGhamdi S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Jul; 22(1):101. PubMed ID: 34315465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetics specialists' perspectives on disclosure of genomic incidental findings in the clinical setting.
    Downing NR; Williams JK; Daack-Hirsch S; Driessnack M; Simon CM
    Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Jan; 90(1):133-8. PubMed ID: 23068909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in Conceptual Understanding of the "Actionability" of Incidental Findings and the Resultant Difference in Ethical Responsibility: An Empirical Study in Japan.
    Ibuki T; Yamamoto K; Matsui K
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2020; 11(3):187-194. PubMed ID: 32615058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 'Ethical responsibility' or 'a whole can of worms': differences in opinion on incidental finding review and disclosure in neuroimaging research from focus group discussions with participants, parents, IRB members, investigators, physicians and community members.
    Cole C; Petree LE; Phillips JP; Shoemaker JM; Holdsworth M; Helitzer DL
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Oct; 41(10):841-7. PubMed ID: 26063579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Choices of incidental findings of individuals undergoing genome wide sequencing, a single center's experience.
    Bishop CL; Strong KA; Dimmock DP
    Clin Genet; 2017 Jan; 91(1):137-140. PubMed ID: 27392285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Disclosure of incidental findings from next-generation sequencing in pediatric genomic research.
    Abdul-Karim R; Berkman BE; Wendler D; Rid A; Khan J; Badgett T; Hull SC
    Pediatrics; 2013 Mar; 131(3):564-71. PubMed ID: 23400601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Considering Actionability at the Participant's Research Setting Level for Anticipatable Incidental Findings from Clinical Research.
    Ortiz-Osorno AB; Ehler LA; Brooks J
    J Law Med Ethics; 2015; 43(3):619-32. PubMed ID: 26479571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Managing the ethical challenges of next-generation sequencing in genomic medicine.
    Clarke AJ
    Br Med Bull; 2014 Sep; 111(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 25122627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The future of incidental findings: should they be viewed as benefits?
    Parker LS
    J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(2):341-51, 213. PubMed ID: 18547203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Responsibility, identity, and genomic sequencing: A comparison of published recommendations and patient perspectives on accepting or declining incidental findings.
    Boardman F; Hale R
    Mol Genet Genomic Med; 2018 Nov; 6(6):1079-1096. PubMed ID: 30370638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. To tell or not to tell? A systematic review of ethical reflections on incidental findings arising in genetics contexts.
    Christenhusz GM; Devriendt K; Dierickx K
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2013 Mar; 21(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 22739341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Criteria for reporting incidental findings in clinical exome sequencing - a focus group study on professional practices and perspectives in Belgian genetic centres.
    Saelaert M; Mertes H; Moerenhout T; De Baere E; Devisch I
    BMC Med Genomics; 2019 Aug; 12(1):123. PubMed ID: 31429751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Processes and factors involved in decisions regarding return of incidental genomic findings in research.
    Klitzman R; Buquez B; Appelbaum PS; Fyer A; Chung WK
    Genet Med; 2014 Apr; 16(4):311-7. PubMed ID: 24071801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Grappling with genomic incidental findings in the clinical realm.
    Hull SC; Berkman BE
    Chest; 2014 Feb; 145(2):226-230. PubMed ID: 24493507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disclosure of Individual Research Results and Incidental Findings in Biobank Research: Why We Need an Evidence-based Approach.
    Fleming J; Otlowski M; Stewart C; Critchley C; Kerridge I
    J Law Med; 2016; 24(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 30136776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.