These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

551 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24917122)

  • 1. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging outperforms the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator in predicting clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Salami SS; Vira MA; Turkbey B; Fakhoury M; Yaskiv O; Villani R; Ben-Levi E; Rastinehad AR
    Cancer; 2014 Sep; 120(18):2876-82. PubMed ID: 24917122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In patients with a previous negative prostate biopsy and a suspicious lesion on magnetic resonance imaging, is a 12-core biopsy still necessary in addition to a targeted biopsy?
    Salami SS; Ben-Levi E; Yaskiv O; Ryniker L; Turkbey B; Kavoussi LR; Villani R; Rastinehad AR
    BJU Int; 2015 Apr; 115(4):562-70. PubMed ID: 25252133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High diagnostic ability of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect anterior prostate cancer missed by transrectal 12-core biopsy.
    Komai Y; Numao N; Yoshida S; Matsuoka Y; Nakanishi Y; Ishii C; Koga F; Saito K; Masuda H; Fujii Y; Kawakami S; Kihara K
    J Urol; 2013 Sep; 190(3):867-73. PubMed ID: 23542406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
    Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Usefulness of pre-biopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and clinical variables to reduce initial prostate biopsy in men with suspected clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Numao N; Yoshida S; Komai Y; Ishii C; Kagawa M; Kijima T; Yokoyama M; Ishioka J; Matsuoka Y; Koga F; Saito K; Masuda H; Fujii Y; Kawakami S; Kihara K
    J Urol; 2013 Aug; 190(2):502-8. PubMed ID: 23473904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
    Boesen L
    Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The predictive value of endorectal 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer.
    Somford DM; Hamoen EH; Fütterer JJ; van Basten JP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Vreuls W; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Kiemeney LA; Barentsz JO; Witjes JA
    J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1728-34. PubMed ID: 23680307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.
    Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kesch C; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Celik K; Distler F; Roth W; Wieczorek K; Stock C; Duensing S; Roethke MC; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Bonekamp D; Hadaschik BA
    Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):888-896. PubMed ID: 28400169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PCA3 sensitivity and specificity for prostate cancer detection in patients with abnormal PSA and/or suspicious digital rectal examination. First Latin American experience.
    Ramos CG; Valdevenito R; Vergara I; Anabalon P; Sanchez C; Fulla J
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1522-6. PubMed ID: 22687565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The digital rectal examination (DRE) remains important - outcomes from a contemporary cohort of men undergoing an initial 12-18 core prostate needle biopsy.
    Palmerola R; Smith P; Elliot V; Reese CT; Mahon FB; Harpster LE; Icitovic N; Raman JD
    Can J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(6):6542-7. PubMed ID: 23228289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early detection of high-grade prostate cancer using digital rectal examination (DRE) in men with a prostate-specific antigen level of <2.5 ng/mL and the risk of death.
    Hattangadi JA; Chen MH; D'Amico AV
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1636-41. PubMed ID: 22757982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Urine TMPRSS2:ERG Plus PCA3 for Individualized Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment.
    Tomlins SA; Day JR; Lonigro RJ; Hovelson DH; Siddiqui J; Kunju LP; Dunn RL; Meyer S; Hodge P; Groskopf J; Wei JT; Chinnaiyan AM
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jul; 70(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 25985884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictive modeling for the presence of prostate carcinoma using clinical, laboratory, and ultrasound parameters in patients with prostate specific antigen levels < or = 10 ng/mL.
    Garzotto M; Hudson RG; Peters L; Hsieh YC; Barrera E; Mori M; Beer TM; Klein T
    Cancer; 2003 Oct; 98(7):1417-22. PubMed ID: 14508828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate can improve the predictive value of the urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 test in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and a previous negative biopsy.
    Sciarra A; Panebianco V; Cattarino S; Busetto GM; De Berardinis E; Ciccariello M; Gentile V; Salciccia S
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1661-5. PubMed ID: 22564540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore prostate biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in biopsy naïve men with elevated prostate specific antigen.
    Quentin M; Blondin D; Arsov C; Schimmöller L; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Albers P; Antoch G; Rabenalt R
    J Urol; 2014 Nov; 192(5):1374-9. PubMed ID: 24866597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.
    Oh JJ; Hong SK; Lee JK; Lee BK; Lee S; Kwon OS; Byun SS; Lee SE
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E494-9. PubMed ID: 22540236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is a useful modality for the precise detection and staging of early prostate cancer.
    Hara N; Okuizumi M; Koike H; Kawaguchi M; Bilim V
    Prostate; 2005 Feb; 62(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 15389803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy improves detection rates of prostate cancer in pre-biopsied patients].
    Maxeiner A; Fischer T; Stephan C; Cash H; Slowinski T; Kilic E; Durmus T
    Aktuelle Urol; 2014 May; 45(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 24902069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over detection: a prospective study.
    Thompson JE; Moses D; Shnier R; Brenner P; Delprado W; Ponsky L; Pulbrook M; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Hayen A; Stricker PD
    J Urol; 2014 Jul; 192(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 24518762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abdominal obesity as risk factor for prostate cancer diagnosis and high grade disease: a prospective multicenter Italian cohort study.
    De Nunzio C; Albisinni S; Freedland SJ; Miano L; Cindolo L; Finazzi Agrò E; Autorino R; De Sio M; Schips L; Tubaro A
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):997-1002. PubMed ID: 21925906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.