BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24917331)

  • 1. Utility values for specific hepatic encephalopathy health states elicited from the general public in the United Kingdom.
    Guest JF; Nanuwa K; Barden R
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2014 Jun; 12():89. PubMed ID: 24917331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Utility values for specific chronic myeloid leukemia chronic phase health states from the general public in the United Kingdom.
    Guest JF; Gray EJ; Szczudlo T; Magestro M
    Leuk Lymphoma; 2014 Aug; 55(8):1870-5. PubMed ID: 24313831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpretation of health and vision utilities in low vision patients.
    Malkin AG; Goldstein JE; Massof RW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Mar; 89(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 22227913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Examination of assumptions in using time tradeoff and standard gamble utilities in individuals with spinal cord injury.
    Lin MR; Yu WY; Wang SC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Feb; 93(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 22289233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The utility assessment method order influences measurement of parents' risk attitude.
    Finnell SM; Carroll AE; Downs SM
    Value Health; 2012; 15(6):926-32. PubMed ID: 22999143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health-related quality of life in patients with uveitis.
    Shamdas M; Bassilious K; Murray PI
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 103(9):1284-1288. PubMed ID: 30361275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What utility scores do mental health service users, healthcare professionals and members of the general public attribute to different health states? A co-produced mixed methods online survey.
    Flood C; Barlow S; Simpson A; Burls A; Price A; Cartwright M; Brini S;
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205223. PubMed ID: 30352071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The time horizon matters: results of an exploratory study varying the timeframe in time trade-off and standard gamble utility elicitation.
    Matza LS; Boye KS; Feeny DH; Bowman L; Johnston JA; Stewart KD; McDaniel K; Jordan J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2016 Nov; 17(8):979-990. PubMed ID: 26611792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feasibility, comparability, and reliability of the standard gamble compared with the rating scale and time trade-off techniques in Korean population.
    Kim SH; Lee SI; Jo MW
    Qual Life Res; 2017 Dec; 26(12):3387-3397. PubMed ID: 28801862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer in Taiwan.
    Chou TC; Chiang SC; Ko Y
    Breast; 2020 Jun; 51():57-64. PubMed ID: 32213442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of caregiver and parenting status on time trade-off and standard gamble utility scores for health state descriptions.
    Matza LS; Boye KS; Feeny DH; Johnston JA; Bowman L; Jordan JB
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2014 Apr; 12():48. PubMed ID: 24716709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring utilities of severe facial disfigurement and composite tissue allotransplantation of the face in patients with severe face and neck burns from the perspectives of the general public, medical experts and patients.
    Chuback J; Yarascavitch B; Yarascavitch A; Kaur MN; Martin S; Thoma A
    Burns; 2015 Nov; 41(7):1524-31. PubMed ID: 26068209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utility values for advanced soft tissue sarcoma health States from the general public in the United kingdom.
    Guest JF; Sladkevicius E; Gough N; Linch M; Grimer R
    Sarcoma; 2013; 2013():863056. PubMed ID: 23576896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The health utility of mild and severe dysphonia.
    DeVore EK; Shrime MG; Wittenberg E; Franco RA; Song PC; Naunheim MR
    Laryngoscope; 2020 May; 130(5):1256-1262. PubMed ID: 31381164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Valuation of arthritis health states across ethnic groups and between patients and community members.
    Souchek J; Byrne MM; Kelly PA; O' Malley K; Richardson M; Pak C; Nelson H; Suarez-Almazor ME
    Med Care; 2005 Sep; 43(9):921-8. PubMed ID: 16116357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of methods for converting DCE values onto the full health-dead QALY scale.
    Rowen D; Brazier J; Van Hout B
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Apr; 35(3):328-40. PubMed ID: 25398621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What is it going to be, TTO or SG? A direct test of the validity of health state valuation.
    Lipman SA; Brouwer WBF; Attema AE
    Health Econ; 2020 Nov; 29(11):1475-1481. PubMed ID: 32744408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new explanation for the difference between time trade-off utilities and standard gamble utilities.
    Bleichrodt H
    Health Econ; 2002 Jul; 11(5):447-56. PubMed ID: 12112493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Health State Utility Measures in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.
    Noel CW; Lee DJ; Kong Q; Xu W; Simpson C; Brown D; Gilbert RW; Gullane PJ; Irish JC; Huang SH; O'Sullivan B; Goldstein DP; de Almeida JR
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Aug; 141(8):696-703. PubMed ID: 26204439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Health utility scores of colorectal cancer based on societal preference in Japan.
    Shiroiwa T; Fukuda T; Tsutani K
    Qual Life Res; 2009 Oct; 18(8):1095-103. PubMed ID: 19626462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.