These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24918109)

  • 1. A large-scale quantitative analysis of latent factors and sentiment in online doctor reviews.
    Wallace BC; Paul MJ; Sarkar U; Trikalinos TA; Dredze M
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2014; 21(6):1098-103. PubMed ID: 24918109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A tale of two countries: International comparison of online doctor reviews between China and the United States.
    Hao H; Zhang K; Wang W; Gao G
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Mar; 99():37-44. PubMed ID: 28118920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The development of online doctor reviews in China: an analysis of the largest online doctor review website in China.
    Hao H
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jun; 17(6):e134. PubMed ID: 26032933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic Classification of Online Doctor Reviews: Evaluation of Text Classifier Algorithms.
    Rivas R; Montazeri N; Le NX; Hristidis V
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Nov; 20(11):e11141. PubMed ID: 30425030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gender, Soft Skills, and Patient Experience in Online Physician Reviews: A Large-Scale Text Analysis.
    Dunivin Z; Zadunayski L; Baskota U; Siek K; Mankoff J
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jul; 22(7):e14455. PubMed ID: 32729844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Voice of Chinese Health Consumers: A Text Mining Approach to Web-Based Physician Reviews.
    Hao H; Zhang K
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 May; 18(5):e108. PubMed ID: 27165558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automating Large-scale Health Care Service Feedback Analysis: Sentiment Analysis and Topic Modeling Study.
    Alexander G; Bahja M; Butt GF
    JMIR Med Inform; 2022 Apr; 10(4):e29385. PubMed ID: 35404254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparison of Online Physician Ratings and Internal Patient-Submitted Ratings from a Large Healthcare System.
    Okike K; Uhr NR; Shin SYM; Xie KC; Kim CY; Funahashi TT; Kanter MH
    J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2575-2579. PubMed ID: 31531811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Insights into the impact of online physician reviews on patients' decision making: randomized experiment.
    Grabner-Kräuter S; Waiguny MK
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Apr; 17(4):e93. PubMed ID: 25862516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sentiment Analysis of Online Patient-Written Reviews of Vascular Surgeons.
    Cho LD; Tang JE; Pitaro N; Bai H; Cooke PV; Arvind V; Kim J; Ting W
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2023 Jan; 88():249-255. PubMed ID: 36028181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploring the impact of online information signals in leveraging the economic returns of physicians.
    Shah AM; Yan X; Shah SAA; Shah SJ; Mamirkulova G
    J Biomed Inform; 2019 Oct; 98():103272. PubMed ID: 31479747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Online Physician Reviews Do Not Reflect Patient Satisfaction Survey Responses.
    Widmer RJ; Maurer MJ; Nayar VR; Aase LA; Wald JT; Kotsenas AL; Timimi FK; Harper CM; Pruthi S
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2018 Apr; 93(4):453-457. PubMed ID: 29622095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Impact of Social Media on Negative Online Physician Reviews: an Observational Study in a Large, Academic, Multispecialty Practice.
    Widmer RJ; Shepard M; Aase LA; Wald JT; Pruthi S; Timimi FK
    J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Jan; 34(1):98-101. PubMed ID: 30374885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding Your Online Ratings: A Methodological Analysis Using Urogynecologists in the United States.
    Huber SA; Priestley J; Kasabwala K; Gadidov B; Culligan P
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):193-197. PubMed ID: 30807427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and structural and quality of care measures: results from two German physician rating websites.
    Emmert M; Adelhardt T; Sander U; Wambach V; Lindenthal J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Sep; 15():414. PubMed ID: 26404452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [German language physician rating sites].
    Strech D; Reimann S
    Gesundheitswesen; 2012 Aug; 74(8-9):e61-7. PubMed ID: 22189671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How are Patients Describing You Online? A Natural Language Processing Driven Sentiment Analysis of Online Reviews on CSRS Surgeons.
    Tang J; Arvind V; White CA; Dominy C; Cho S; Kim JS
    Clin Spine Surg; 2023 Mar; 36(2):E107-E113. PubMed ID: 35945670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and clinical quality of care measures for US hospitals: results from an observational study.
    Emmert M; Meszmer N; Schlesinger M
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Feb; 18(1):82. PubMed ID: 29402321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chronic Pain Practices: An Evaluation of Positive and Negative Online Patient Reviews.
    Orhurhu MS; Salisu B; Sottosanti E; Abimbola N; Urits I; Jones M; Viswanath O; Kaye AD; Simopoulos T; Orhurhu V
    Pain Physician; 2019 Sep; 22(5):E477-E486. PubMed ID: 31561660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of sentiment analysis for capturing patient experience from free-text comments posted online.
    Greaves F; Ramirez-Cano D; Millett C; Darzi A; Donaldson L
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Nov; 15(11):e239. PubMed ID: 24184993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.