These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24918109)

  • 21. A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and clinical quality of care measures for US hospitals: results from an observational study.
    Emmert M; Meszmer N; Schlesinger M
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Feb; 18(1):82. PubMed ID: 29402321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. What patients say about their doctors online: a qualitative content analysis.
    López A; Detz A; Ratanawongsa N; Sarkar U
    J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 27(6):685-92. PubMed ID: 22215270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Chronic Pain Practices: An Evaluation of Positive and Negative Online Patient Reviews.
    Orhurhu MS; Salisu B; Sottosanti E; Abimbola N; Urits I; Jones M; Viswanath O; Kaye AD; Simopoulos T; Orhurhu V
    Pain Physician; 2019 Sep; 22(5):E477-E486. PubMed ID: 31561660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Negative and Positive Online Patient Reviews of Physicians-1 vs 5 Stars.
    Shemirani NL; Castrillon J
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Sep; 19(5):435-436. PubMed ID: 28125751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Correlation of Online Physician Rating Subscores and Association With Overall Satisfaction: Observational Study of 212,933 Providers.
    Zhao HH; Luu M; Spiegel B; Daskivich TJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Oct; 22(10):e11258. PubMed ID: 33107826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Concierge care and patient reviews.
    Nemzer LR; Neymotin F
    Health Econ; 2020 Aug; 29(8):913-922. PubMed ID: 32515116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessing the reliability of automatic sentiment analysis tools on rating the sentiment of reviews of NHS dental practices in England.
    Byrne M; O'Malley L; Glenny AM; Pretty I; Tickle M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0259797. PubMed ID: 34910757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Online doctor reviews: do they track surgeon volume, a proxy for quality of care?
    Segal J; Sacopulos M; Sheets V; Thurston I; Brooks K; Puccia R
    J Med Internet Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):e50. PubMed ID: 22491423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures?
    Hageman MG; Ring DC; Gregory PJ; Rubash HE; Harmon L
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 May; 473(5):1590-7. PubMed ID: 25287521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Effect of Online Effort and Reputation of Physicians on Patients' Choice: 3-Wave Data Analysis of China's Good Doctor Website.
    Deng Z; Hong Z; Zhang W; Evans R; Chen Y
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Mar; 21(3):e10170. PubMed ID: 30848726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessing Patient Experience and Healthcare Quality of Dental Care Using Patient Online Reviews in the United States: Mixed Methods Study.
    Lin Y; Hong YA; Henson BS; Stevenson RD; Hong S; Lyu T; Liang C
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jul; 22(7):e18652. PubMed ID: 32673240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Long-term doctor-patient relationships: patient perspective from online reviews.
    Detz A; López A; Sarkar U
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Jul; 15(7):e131. PubMed ID: 23819959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Using sentiment analysis to review patient satisfaction data located on the internet.
    Hopper AM; Uriyo M
    J Health Organ Manag; 2015; 29(2):221-33. PubMed ID: 25800334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. What Do Patients Care About? Mining Fine-grained Patient Concerns from Online Physician Reviews Through Computer-Assisted Multi-level Qualitative Analysis.
    He L; He C; Wang Y; Hu Z; Zheng K; Chen Y
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2020; 2020():544-553. PubMed ID: 33936428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Can online health information sources really improve patient satisfaction?
    Sun Y; Yu J; Chiu YL; Hsu YT
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():940800. PubMed ID: 35991030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of Dermatology Practice Online Reviews: Lessons From Qualitative Analysis.
    Smith RJ; Lipoff JB
    JAMA Dermatol; 2016 Feb; 152(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 26606326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. What are patients saying about you online? A sentiment analysis of online written reviews on Scoliosis Research Society surgeons.
    Tang JE; Arvind V; White CA; Dominy C; Kim JS; Cho SK
    Spine Deform; 2022 Mar; 10(2):301-306. PubMed ID: 34599750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Determination of Patient Sentiment and Emotion in Ophthalmology: Infoveillance Tutorial on Web-Based Health Forum Discussions.
    Nguyen AX; Trinh XV; Wang SY; Wu AY
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 May; 23(5):e20803. PubMed ID: 33999001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Association Between Physician Online Rating and Quality of Care.
    Okike K; Peter-Bibb TK; Xie KC; Okike ON
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Dec; 18(12):e324. PubMed ID: 27965191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Online Physician Reviews in Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery: What Do Patients Really Want?
    Asanad K; Parameshwar PS; Houman J; Spiegel BM; Daskivich TJ; Anger JT
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(2):109-114. PubMed ID: 29474282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.