These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24918333)
1. Comparison between digital subtraction angiography and real-time fluoroscopy to detect intravascular injection during lumbar transforaminal epidural injections. Hong JH; Huh B; Shin HH Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2014; 39(4):329-32. PubMed ID: 24918333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of Intravascular Injection During Cervical Transforaminal Epidural Injection: A Comparison of Digital Subtraction Angiography and Real Time Fluoroscopy. Jeon Y; Kim S Pain Physician; 2018 Mar; 21(2):E181-E186. PubMed ID: 29565961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intravascular flow detection during transforaminal epidural injections: a prospective assessment. El Abd OH; Amadera JE; Pimentel DC; Pimentel TS Pain Physician; 2014; 17(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 24452642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital subtraction angiography does not reliably prevent paraplegia associated with lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection. Chang Chien GC; Candido KD; Knezevic NN Pain Physician; 2012; 15(6):515-23. PubMed ID: 23159970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital Subtraction Angiography Use During Epidural Steroid Injections Does Not Reliably Distinguish Artery from Vein. Nagpal AS; Chang-Chien GC; Benfield JA; Candido KD; Rana MV; Eckmann M Pain Physician; 2016 May; 19(4):255-66. PubMed ID: 27228513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of inadvertent intradiscal and intravascular injection during lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections: a prospective study. Hong JH; Kim SY; Huh B; Shin HH Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2013; 38(6):520-5. PubMed ID: 24141875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of incidence of intravascular injections during transforaminal epidural steroid injection using different needle types. Hong JH; Lee YH Korean J Anesthesiol; 2014 Sep; 67(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 25302096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital subtraction angiography versus real-time fluoroscopy for detection of intravascular penetration prior to epidural steroid injections: meta-analysis of prospective studies. Visnjevac O; Kim P; Farid-Davari S; Johnson P; Nader ND Pain Physician; 2015; 18(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 25675057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The rate of detection of intravascular injection in cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections with and without digital subtraction angiography. McLean JP; Sigler JD; Plastaras CT; Garvan CW; Rittenberg JD PM R; 2009 Jul; 1(7):636-42. PubMed ID: 19627957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of live fluoroscopy to detect intravascular injection during lumbar transforaminal epidural injections. Lee MH; Yang KS; Kim YH; Jung HD; Lim SJ; Moon DE Korean J Pain; 2010 Mar; 23(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 20552068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rates of lumbosacral transforaminal injections interpreted as intravascular: fluoroscopy alone or with digital subtraction. Kim YH; Park HJ; Moon DE Anaesthesia; 2013 Nov; 68(11):1120-3. PubMed ID: 23937540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Whitacre Needle Reduces the Incidence of Intravascular Uptake in Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections. Hong J; Jung S; Chang H Pain Physician; 2015; 18(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 26218935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiation dose incurred in the exclusion of vascular filling in transforaminal epidural steroid injections: fluoroscopy, digital subtraction angiography, and CT/fluoroscopy. Maus T; Schueler BA; Leng S; Magnuson D; Magnuson DJ; Diehn FE Pain Med; 2014 Aug; 15(8):1328-33. PubMed ID: 24961152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk of intravascular injection in transforaminal epidural injections. Nahm FS; Lee CJ; Lee SH; Kim TH; Sim WS; Cho HS; Park SY; Kim YC; Lee SC Anaesthesia; 2010 Sep; 65(9):917-21. PubMed ID: 20645947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital subtraction angiography vs. real-time fluoroscopy for detection of intravascular injection during transforaminal epidural block. Park K; Kim S Yeungnam Univ J Med; 2019 May; 36(2):109-114. PubMed ID: 31620622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Incidence of Inadvertent Intravascular Injection during CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Epidural Steroid Injections. Kranz PG; Amrhein TJ; Gray L AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2015 May; 36(5):1000-7. PubMed ID: 25614475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Novel Method for S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection. Park YJ; Lee SH; Ryu KH; Kim YK; Shim J; Lee HW; Kim YH World Neurosurg; 2020 Jan; 133():e443-e447. PubMed ID: 31526885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Incidences of Intravascular Injection between Medial and Lateral Side Approaches during Traditional S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection. Park SJ; Kim SH; Kim SJ; Yoon DM; Yoon KB Pain Res Manag; 2017; 2017():6426802. PubMed ID: 28490942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]