246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24918904)
1. Hemodynamic impact of cerebral aneurysm endovascular treatment devices: coils and flow diverters.
Goubergrits L; Schaller J; Kertzscher U; Woelken T; Ringelstein M; Spuler A
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2014 Jul; 11(4):361-73. PubMed ID: 24918904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of stents and flow diverters on hemodynamics in idealized aneurysm models.
Seshadhri S; Janiga G; Beuing O; Skalej M; Thévenin D
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Jul; 133(7):071005. PubMed ID: 21823744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hemodynamics in two tandem aneurysms treated with flow diverters.
Mut F; Scrivano E; Bleise C; Lylyk P; Cebral J
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2014 Apr; 30(4):517-24. PubMed ID: 24353243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hemodynamic Characterization of Geometric Cerebral Aneurysm Templates Treated With Embolic Coils.
Nair P; Chong BW; Indahlastari A; Ryan J; Workman C; Haithem Babiker M; Yadollahi Farsani H; Baccin CE; Frakes D
J Biomech Eng; 2016 Feb; 138(2):021011. PubMed ID: 26593324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stent-induced vessel deformation after intracranial aneurysm treatment - A hemodynamic pilot study.
Voß S; Beuing O; Janiga G; Berg P
Comput Biol Med; 2019 Aug; 111():103338. PubMed ID: 31284152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Virtual Comparison of the eCLIPs Device and Conventional Flow-Diverters as Treatment for Cerebral Bifurcation Aneurysms.
Peach TW; Ricci D; Ventikos Y
Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2019 Sep; 10(3):508-519. PubMed ID: 31286438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost analysis of intracranial aneurysmal repair by endovascular coiling versus flow diversion: at what size should we use which method?
Chiu AH; Nadarajah M; Wenderoth JD
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2013 Aug; 57(4):423-6. PubMed ID: 23870337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Angular remodeling in single stent-assisted coiling displaces and attenuates the flow impingement zone at the neck of intracranial bifurcation aneurysms.
Gao B; Baharoglu MI; Malek AM
Neurosurgery; 2013 May; 72(5):739-48; discussion 748. PubMed ID: 23328687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intra-aneurysmal hemodynamic alterations by a self-expandable intracranial stent and flow diversion stent: high intra-aneurysmal pressure remains regardless of flow velocity reduction.
Shobayashi Y; Tateshima S; Kakizaki R; Sudo R; Tanishita K; Viñuela F
J Neurointerv Surg; 2013 Nov; 5 Suppl 3():iii38-42. PubMed ID: 23048176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An in vitro study of pulsatile fluid dynamics in intracranial aneurysm models treated with embolic coils and flow diverters.
Babiker MH; Gonzalez LF; Albuquerque F; Collins D; Elvikis A; Zwart C; Roszelle B; Frakes DH
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Apr; 60(4):1150-9. PubMed ID: 23192467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Effects of flow diverter with low porosity on cerebral aneurysms: a numerical stimulative study].
Huang QH; Yang PF; Zhang X; Shi Y; Shao XM; Liu JM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Apr; 90(15):1024-7. PubMed ID: 20646519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of the hemodynamic effects of flow diverters on wide-necked and narrow-necked cerebral aneurysms.
Wu YF; Yang PF; Shen J; Huang QH; Zhang X; Qian Y; Liu JM
J Clin Neurosci; 2012 Nov; 19(11):1520-4. PubMed ID: 22704947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hemodynamics investigation for a giant aneurysm treated by a flow diverter implantation.
Wang S; Li J; Wang C; Yang X; Mu S; Wang W
Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S225-31. PubMed ID: 26406006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How do coil configuration and packing density influence intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics?
Morales HG; Kim M; Vivas EE; Villa-Uriol MC; Larrabide I; Sola T; Guimaraens L; Frangi AF
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2011; 32(10):1935-41. PubMed ID: 21885712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Finite element modeling of embolic coil deployment: multifactor characterization of treatment effects on cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics.
Babiker MH; Chong B; Gonzalez LF; Cheema S; Frakes DH
J Biomech; 2013 Nov; 46(16):2809-16. PubMed ID: 24119679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Towards the patient-specific design of flow diverters made from helix-like wires: an optimization study.
Zhang M; Anzai H; Chopard B; Ohta M
Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Dec; 15(Suppl 2):159. PubMed ID: 28155683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison among different high porosity stent configurations: hemodynamic effects of treatment in a large cerebral aneurysm.
Roszelle BN; Nair P; Gonzalez LF; Haithem Babiker M; Ryan J; Frakes D
J Biomech Eng; 2014 Feb; 136(2):021013. PubMed ID: 24337100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Newtonian and non-Newtonian blood flow in coiled cerebral aneurysms.
Morales HG; Larrabide I; Geers AJ; Aguilar ML; Frangi AF
J Biomech; 2013 Sep; 46(13):2158-64. PubMed ID: 23891312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intracranial stents being modeled as a porous medium: flow simulation in stented cerebral aneurysms.
Augsburger L; Reymond P; Rufenacht DA; Stergiopulos N
Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Feb; 39(2):850-63. PubMed ID: 21042856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hemodynamics of Flow Diverters.
Dholakia R; Sadasivan C; Fiorella DJ; Woo HH; Lieber BB
J Biomech Eng; 2017 Feb; 139(2):. PubMed ID: 27727400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
