219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24919079)
1. Interface stress in socket/residual limb with transtibial prosthetic suspension systems during locomotion on slopes and stairs.
Eshraghi A; Abu Osman NA; Gholizadeh H; Ali S; Abas WA
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Jan; 94(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 24919079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interface pressure in transtibial socket during ascent and descent on stairs and its effect on patient satisfaction.
Ali S; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Gholizadeh H; Abd Razak NA; Wan Abas WA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013; 28(9-10):994-9. PubMed ID: 24161521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of Dermo and Seal-In X5 prosthetic liners on pressure distributions and reported satisfaction during ramp ambulation in persons with transtibial limb loss.
Ali S; Osman NA; Razak A; Hussain S; Wan Abas WA
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Feb; 51(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24963603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pressure characteristics at the stump/socket interface in transtibial amputees using an adaptive prosthetic foot.
Wolf SI; Alimusaj M; Fradet L; Siegel J; Braatz F
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Dec; 24(10):860-5. PubMed ID: 19744755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An experimental study of the interface pressure profile during level walking of a new suspension system for lower limb amputees.
Eshraghi A; Abu Osman NA; Gholizadeh H; Ali S; Sævarsson SK; Wan Abas WA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013 Jan; 28(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 23157843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transtibial prosthetic socket pistoning: static evaluation of Seal-In(®) X5 and Dermo(®) Liner using motion analysis system.
Gholizadeh H; Osman NA; Kamyab M; Eshraghi A; Abas WA; Azam MN
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jan; 27(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 21794965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Techniques for Interface Stress Measurements within Prosthetic Sockets of Transtibial Amputees: A Review of the Past 50 Years of Research.
Al-Fakih EA; Abu Osman NA; Mahmad Adikan FR
Sensors (Basel); 2016 Jul; 16(7):. PubMed ID: 27447646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of a prosthetic suspension system: Looped silicone liner.
Abu Osman NA; Gholizadeh H; Eshraghi A; Wan Abas WAB
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Oct; 41(5):476-483. PubMed ID: 28946824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative and qualitative comparison of a new prosthetic suspension system with two existing suspension systems for lower limb amputees.
Eshraghi A; Abu Osman NA; Karimi MT; Gholizadeh H; Ali S; Wan Abas WA
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Dec; 91(12):1028-38. PubMed ID: 23168378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interface pressures and shear stresses at thirteen socket sites on two persons with transtibial amputation.
Sanders JE; Lam D; Dralle AJ; Okumura R
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1997 Jan; 34(1):19-43. PubMed ID: 9021623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between microprocessor-controlled ankle/foot and conventional prosthetic feet during stair negotiation in people with unilateral transtibial amputation.
Agrawal V; Gailey RS; Gaunaurd IA; O'Toole C; Finnieston AA
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(7):941-50. PubMed ID: 24301431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Socket considerations for the patient with a transtibial amputation.
Fergason J; Smith DG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Apr; (361):76-84. PubMed ID: 10212599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative study between patellar-tendon-bearing and pressure cast prosthetic sockets.
Goh JC; Lee PV; Chong SY
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2004 May; 41(3B):491-501. PubMed ID: 15543467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of pressure distributions between two types of sockets in a bulbous stump.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Arifin N; Chung TY
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Aug; 40(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 25583929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of activity intensity, time, and intermittent doffing on daily limb fluid volume change in people with transtibial amputation.
Youngblood RT; Hafner BJ; Allyn KJ; Cagle JC; Hinrichs P; Redd C; Vamos AC; Ciol MA; Bean N; Sanders JE
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Feb; 43(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 30010494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of two prosthetic suspension systems in a bilateral transtibial amputee.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Kamyab M; Eshraghi A; Lúvíksdóttir AG; Wan Abas WA
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Oct; 91(10):894-8. PubMed ID: 22173083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does activity affect residual limb skin temperatures?
Klute GK; Huff E; Ledoux WR
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Oct; 472(10):3062-7. PubMed ID: 24964887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of interface pressures with pin and suction suspension systems.
Beil TL; Street GM
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2004; 41(6A):821-8. PubMed ID: 15685470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gait biomechanics of individuals with transtibial amputation: effect of suspension system.
Eshraghi A; Abu Osman NA; Karimi M; Gholizadeh H; Soodmand E; Wan Abas WA
PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96988. PubMed ID: 24865351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Satisfaction and problems experienced with transfemoral suspension systems: a comparison between common suction socket and seal-in liner.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Ali S; Yahyavi ES
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 94(8):1584-9. PubMed ID: 23262380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
