183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24919655)
1. Influence of crown-to-implant ratio on stress around single short-wide implants: a photoelastic stress analysis.
Sotto-Maior BS; Senna PM; da Silva-Neto JP; de Arruda Nóbilo MA; Del Bel Cury AA
J Prosthodont; 2015 Jan; 24(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 24919655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stress distribution in implant-supported prosthesis with external and internal implant-abutment connections.
Coelho Goiato M; Pesqueira AA; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Dos Santos DM; Haddad MF; Bannwart LC; Moreno A
Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Mar; 71(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 22486241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Photoelastic analysis of biomechanical behavior of single and multiple fixed partial prostheses with different prosthetic connections.
Tonella BP; Pellizzer EP; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Ferraço R; de Faria Almeida DA
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2060-3. PubMed ID: 22067856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Photoelastic stress analysis of different designs of cement-retained fixed partial dentures on Morse taper oral implants.
Menani LR; Tiossi R; de Torres ÉM; Ribeiro RF; de Almeida RP
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):674-8. PubMed ID: 21415635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of implant angulation with different crowns on stress distribution.
Pellizzer EP; Falcón-Antenucci RM; de Carvalho PS; Sánchez DM; Rinaldi GA; de Aguirre CC; Goiato MC
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):434-7. PubMed ID: 21403571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Photoelastic analysis of the influence of prosthetic material on the stress distribution in bone around implant].
Zhang SJ; Zeng JY; Li J; Zhang R; Yin JY; Wang H
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jan; 53(1):30-35. PubMed ID: 29972961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: digital photoelasticity.
Goiato MC; Shibayama R; Gennari Filho H; de Medeiros RA; Pesqueira AA; dos Santos DM; de Araújo CA
J Med Eng Technol; 2016; 40(2):35-42. PubMed ID: 26783652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative analysis of stress in a new proposal of dental implants.
Valente MLDC; de Castro DT; Macedo AP; Shimano AC; Dos Reis AC
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2017 Aug; 77():360-365. PubMed ID: 28532041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of crown-to-implant ratio on peri-implant stress: a finite element analysis.
Verri FR; Batista VE; Santiago JF; Almeida DA; Pellizzer EP
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2014 Dec; 45():234-40. PubMed ID: 25491825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution with different implant systems.
Pellizzer EP; Carli RI; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Verri FR; Goiato MC; Villa LM
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 22208909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of Metal and Ceramic Abutments on the Stress Distribution Around Narrow Implants: A Photoelastic Stress Analysis.
Galvão GH; Grossi JA; Zielak JC; Giovanini AF; Furuse AY; Gonzaga CC
Implant Dent; 2016 Aug; 25(4):499-503. PubMed ID: 26963745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.
Kohal RJ; Klaus G; Strub JR
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Photoelastic analysis of stresses transmitted by universal cast to long abutment on implant-supported single restorations under static occlusal loads.
Aguiar FA; Tiossi R; Macedo AP; Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF; Rodrigues RC
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(7 Suppl 1):2019-23. PubMed ID: 23154374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of increased crown height on stress distribution in short dental implant components and their surrounding bone: A finite element analysis.
Bulaqi HA; Mousavi Mashhadi M; Safari H; Samandari MM; Geramipanah F
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):548-57. PubMed ID: 25794917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis of interface force transmission of internal-cone implants.
Akça K; Cehreli MC
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Aug; 28(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 18717378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the correlation of photoelasticity and digital imaging to characterize the load transfer of implant-supported restorations.
Tiossi R; de Torres EM; Rodrigues RC; Conrad HJ; de Mattos Mda G; Fok AS; Ribeiro RF
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):276-84. PubMed ID: 24461947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stress patterns around distal angled implants in the all-on-four concept configuration.
Begg T; Geerts GA; Gryzagoridis J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):663-71. PubMed ID: 19885406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Photoelastic stress analysis of different wide implant/abutment interfaces under oblique loading.
das Neves FD; Verissimo AG; da Silva Neto JP; do Prado CJ; de Araújo CA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):e39-44. PubMed ID: 23377080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of crown-to-implant ratio, retention system, restorative material, and occlusal loading on stress concentrations in single short implants.
Sotto-Maior BS; Senna PM; da Silva WJ; Rocha EP; Del Bel Cury AA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):e13-8. PubMed ID: 22616067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is one dental mini-implant biomechanically appropriate for the retention of a mandibular overdenture? A comparison with Morse taper and external hexagon platforms.
Borges GA; Presotto AGC; Caldas RA; Pisani MX; Mesquita MF
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):491-499. PubMed ID: 32278498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
