These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24919655)

  • 1. Influence of crown-to-implant ratio on stress around single short-wide implants: a photoelastic stress analysis.
    Sotto-Maior BS; Senna PM; da Silva-Neto JP; de Arruda Nóbilo MA; Del Bel Cury AA
    J Prosthodont; 2015 Jan; 24(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 24919655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stress distribution in implant-supported prosthesis with external and internal implant-abutment connections.
    Coelho Goiato M; Pesqueira AA; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Dos Santos DM; Haddad MF; Bannwart LC; Moreno A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Mar; 71(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 22486241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Photoelastic analysis of biomechanical behavior of single and multiple fixed partial prostheses with different prosthetic connections.
    Tonella BP; Pellizzer EP; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Ferraço R; de Faria Almeida DA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2060-3. PubMed ID: 22067856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Photoelastic stress analysis of different designs of cement-retained fixed partial dentures on Morse taper oral implants.
    Menani LR; Tiossi R; de Torres ÉM; Ribeiro RF; de Almeida RP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):674-8. PubMed ID: 21415635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of implant angulation with different crowns on stress distribution.
    Pellizzer EP; Falcón-Antenucci RM; de Carvalho PS; Sánchez DM; Rinaldi GA; de Aguirre CC; Goiato MC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):434-7. PubMed ID: 21403571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Photoelastic analysis of the influence of prosthetic material on the stress distribution in bone around implant].
    Zhang SJ; Zeng JY; Li J; Zhang R; Yin JY; Wang H
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jan; 53(1):30-35. PubMed ID: 29972961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: digital photoelasticity.
    Goiato MC; Shibayama R; Gennari Filho H; de Medeiros RA; Pesqueira AA; dos Santos DM; de Araújo CA
    J Med Eng Technol; 2016; 40(2):35-42. PubMed ID: 26783652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative analysis of stress in a new proposal of dental implants.
    Valente MLDC; de Castro DT; Macedo AP; Shimano AC; Dos Reis AC
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2017 Aug; 77():360-365. PubMed ID: 28532041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of crown-to-implant ratio on peri-implant stress: a finite element analysis.
    Verri FR; Batista VE; Santiago JF; Almeida DA; Pellizzer EP
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2014 Dec; 45():234-40. PubMed ID: 25491825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution with different implant systems.
    Pellizzer EP; Carli RI; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Verri FR; Goiato MC; Villa LM
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 22208909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of Metal and Ceramic Abutments on the Stress Distribution Around Narrow Implants: A Photoelastic Stress Analysis.
    Galvão GH; Grossi JA; Zielak JC; Giovanini AF; Furuse AY; Gonzaga CC
    Implant Dent; 2016 Aug; 25(4):499-503. PubMed ID: 26963745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.
    Kohal RJ; Klaus G; Strub JR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Photoelastic analysis of stresses transmitted by universal cast to long abutment on implant-supported single restorations under static occlusal loads.
    Aguiar FA; Tiossi R; Macedo AP; Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF; Rodrigues RC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(7 Suppl 1):2019-23. PubMed ID: 23154374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of increased crown height on stress distribution in short dental implant components and their surrounding bone: A finite element analysis.
    Bulaqi HA; Mousavi Mashhadi M; Safari H; Samandari MM; Geramipanah F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):548-57. PubMed ID: 25794917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis of interface force transmission of internal-cone implants.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Aug; 28(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 18717378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the correlation of photoelasticity and digital imaging to characterize the load transfer of implant-supported restorations.
    Tiossi R; de Torres EM; Rodrigues RC; Conrad HJ; de Mattos Mda G; Fok AS; Ribeiro RF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):276-84. PubMed ID: 24461947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stress patterns around distal angled implants in the all-on-four concept configuration.
    Begg T; Geerts GA; Gryzagoridis J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):663-71. PubMed ID: 19885406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Photoelastic stress analysis of different wide implant/abutment interfaces under oblique loading.
    das Neves FD; Verissimo AG; da Silva Neto JP; do Prado CJ; de Araújo CA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):e39-44. PubMed ID: 23377080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of crown-to-implant ratio, retention system, restorative material, and occlusal loading on stress concentrations in single short implants.
    Sotto-Maior BS; Senna PM; da Silva WJ; Rocha EP; Del Bel Cury AA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):e13-8. PubMed ID: 22616067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is one dental mini-implant biomechanically appropriate for the retention of a mandibular overdenture? A comparison with Morse taper and external hexagon platforms.
    Borges GA; Presotto AGC; Caldas RA; Pisani MX; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):491-499. PubMed ID: 32278498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.