These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24919828)

  • 1. Statistical issues in the comparison of quantitative imaging biomarker algorithms using pulmonary nodule volume as an example.
    Obuchowski NA; Barnhart HX; Buckler AJ; Pennello G; Wang XF; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Kim HJ; Reeves AP;
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Feb; 24(1):107-40. PubMed ID: 24919828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative imaging biomarkers: a review of statistical methods for computer algorithm comparisons.
    Obuchowski NA; Reeves AP; Huang EP; Wang XF; Buckler AJ; Kim HJ; Barnhart HX; Jackson EF; Giger ML; Pennello G; Toledano AY; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Apanasovich TV; Kinahan PE; Myers KJ; Goldgof DB; Barboriak DP; Gillies RJ; Schwartz LH; Sullivan DC;
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Feb; 24(1):68-106. PubMed ID: 24919829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Algorithm Variability in the Estimation of Lung Nodule Volume From Phantom CT Scans: Results of the QIBA 3A Public Challenge.
    Athelogou M; Kim HJ; Dima A; Obuchowski N; Peskin A; Gavrielides MA; Petrick N; Saiprasad G; Colditz Colditz D; Beaumont H; Oubel E; Tan Y; Zhao B; Kuhnigk JM; Moltz JH; Orieux G; Gillies RJ; Gu Y; Mantri N; Goldmacher G; Zhang L; Vega E; Bloom M; Jarecha R; Soza G; Tietjen C; Takeguchi T; Yamagata H; Peterson S; Masoud O; Buckler AJ
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Aug; 23(8):940-52. PubMed ID: 27215408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative imaging biomarkers: a review of statistical methods for technical performance assessment.
    Raunig DL; McShane LM; Pennello G; Gatsonis C; Carson PL; Voyvodic JT; Wahl RL; Kurland BF; Schwarz AJ; Gönen M; Zahlmann G; Kondratovich MV; O'Donnell K; Petrick N; Cole PE; Garra B; Sullivan DC;
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Feb; 24(1):27-67. PubMed ID: 24919831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Comparison of Lung Nodule Segmentation Algorithms: Methods and Results from a Multi-institutional Study.
    Kalpathy-Cramer J; Zhao B; Goldgof D; Gu Y; Wang X; Yang H; Tan Y; Gillies R; Napel S
    J Digit Imaging; 2016 Aug; 29(4):476-87. PubMed ID: 26847203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Data transformations for statistical assessment of quantitative imaging biomarkers: Application to lung nodule volumetry.
    Gong Q; Li Q; Gavrielides MA; Petrick N
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Sep; 29(9):2749-2763. PubMed ID: 32133924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical analysis of lung nodule volume measurements with CT in a large-scale phantom study.
    Li Q; Gavrielides MA; Sahiner B; Myers KJ; Zeng R; Petrick N
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3932-47. PubMed ID: 26133594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative imaging biomarkers: Effect of sample size and bias on confidence interval coverage.
    Obuchowski NA; Bullen J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Oct; 27(10):3139-3150. PubMed ID: 29298603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical Issues in Testing Conformance with the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA) Profile Claims.
    Obuchowski NA; Buckler A; Kinahan P; Chen-Mayer H; Petrick N; Barboriak DP; Bullen J; Barnhart H; Sullivan DC
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Apr; 23(4):496-506. PubMed ID: 26898527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pulmonary nodules with ground-glass opacity can be reliably measured with low-dose techniques regardless of iterative reconstruction: results of a phantom study.
    Siegelman JW; Supanich MP; Gavrielides MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):1242-7. PubMed ID: 26001234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative MRCP Imaging: Accuracy, Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Cohort-Derived Normative Ranges.
    Goldfinger MH; Ridgway GR; Ferreira C; Langford CR; Cheng L; Kazimianec A; Borghetto A; Wright TG; Woodward G; Hassanali N; Nicholls RC; Simpson H; Waddell T; Vikal S; Mavar M; Rymell S; Wigley I; Jacobs J; Kelly M; Banerjee R; Brady JM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Sep; 52(3):807-820. PubMed ID: 32147892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance in optimizing CT for the evaluation of lung cancer screen-detected nodules.
    Mulshine JL; Gierada DS; Armato SG; Avila RS; Yankelevitz DF; Kazerooni EA; McNitt-Gray MF; Buckler AJ; Sullivan DC
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Apr; 12(4):390-5. PubMed ID: 25842017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Bayesian framework for performance assessment and comparison of imaging biomarker quantification methods.
    Smith BJ; Beichel RR
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Apr; 28(4):1003-1018. PubMed ID: 29271301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meta-analysis of the technical performance of an imaging procedure: guidelines and statistical methodology.
    Huang EP; Wang XF; Choudhury KR; McShane LM; Gönen M; Ye J; Buckler AJ; Kinahan PE; Reeves AP; Jackson EF; Guimaraes AR; Zahlmann G;
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Feb; 24(1):141-74. PubMed ID: 24872353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of radiation dose and iterative reconstruction algorithms for measurement accuracy and reproducibility of pulmonary nodule volumetry: A phantom study.
    Kim H; Park CM; Song YS; Lee SM; Goo JM
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 May; 83(5):848-57. PubMed ID: 24572380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benefit of overlapping reconstruction for improving the quantitative assessment of CT lung nodule volume.
    Gavrielides MA; Zeng R; Myers KJ; Sahiner B; Petrick N
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Feb; 20(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 23085408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vivo repeatability of automated volume calculations of small pulmonary nodules with CT.
    Rampinelli C; De Fiori E; Raimondi S; Veronesi G; Bellomi M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun; 192(6):1657-61. PubMed ID: 19457831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy and precision of proton density fat fraction measurement across field strengths and scan intervals: A phantom and human study.
    Kim HJ; Cho HJ; Kim B; You MW; Lee JH; Huh J; Kim JK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jul; 50(1):305-314. PubMed ID: 30430684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative CT: technique dependence of volume estimation on pulmonary nodules.
    Chen B; Barnhart H; Richard S; Colsher J; Amurao M; Samei E
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Mar; 57(5):1335-48. PubMed ID: 22349265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Importance of incorporating quantitative imaging biomarker technical performance characteristics when estimating treatment effects.
    Obuchowski NA; Remer EM; Sakaie K; Schneider E; Fox RJ; Nakamura K; Avila R; Guimaraes A
    Clin Trials; 2021 Apr; 18(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 33426918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.