249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24920031)
1. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex induces opposite modulation of reciprocal inhibition in wrist extensor and flexor.
Lackmy-Vallée A; Klomjai W; Bussel B; Katz R; Roche N
J Neurophysiol; 2014 Sep; 112(6):1505-15. PubMed ID: 24920031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the leg motor area on lumbar spinal network excitability in healthy subjects.
Roche N; Lackmy A; Achache V; Bussel B; Katz R
J Physiol; 2011 Jun; 589(Pt 11):2813-26. PubMed ID: 21502292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation and patterned electrical stimulation on spinal inhibitory interneurons and motor function in patients with spinal cord injury.
Yamaguchi T; Fujiwara T; Tsai YA; Tang SC; Kawakami M; Mizuno K; Kodama M; Masakado Y; Liu M
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Jun; 234(6):1469-78. PubMed ID: 26790423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Task-related modulation of crossed spinal inhibition between human lower limbs.
Hanna-Boutros B; Sangari S; Karasu A; Giboin LS; Marchand-Pauvert V
J Neurophysiol; 2014 May; 111(9):1865-76. PubMed ID: 24501265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Priming the Motor Cortex With Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Affects the Acute Inhibitory Corticospinal Responses to Strength Training.
Frazer AK; Howatson G; Ahtiainen JP; Avela J; Rantalainen T; Kidgell DJ
J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Feb; 33(2):307-317. PubMed ID: 30688872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inhibitory action of forearm flexor muscle afferents on corticospinal outputs to antagonist muscles in humans.
Bertolasi L; Priori A; Tinazzi M; Bertasi V; Rothwell JC
J Physiol; 1998 Sep; 511 ( Pt 3)(Pt 3):947-56. PubMed ID: 9714872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acute changes in motor cortical excitability during slow oscillatory and constant anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.
Bergmann TO; Groppa S; Seeger M; Mölle M; Marshall L; Siebner HR
J Neurophysiol; 2009 Oct; 102(4):2303-11. PubMed ID: 19692511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modulation of electromyographic activity of wrist flexor and extensor muscles in patients with writer's cramp.
Valls-Solé J; Hallett M
Mov Disord; 1995 Nov; 10(6):741-8. PubMed ID: 8749993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhances time to task failure of a submaximal contraction of elbow flexors without changing corticospinal excitability.
Abdelmoula A; Baudry S; Duchateau J
Neuroscience; 2016 May; 322():94-103. PubMed ID: 26892298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anodal tDCS applied during strength training enhances motor cortical plasticity.
Hendy AM; Kidgell DJ
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2013 Sep; 45(9):1721-9. PubMed ID: 23470308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transcranial direct current stimulation effects on the excitability of corticospinal axons of the human cerebral cortex.
Di Lazzaro V; Ranieri F; Profice P; Pilato F; Mazzone P; Capone F; Insola A; Oliviero A
Brain Stimul; 2013 Jul; 6(4):641-3. PubMed ID: 23085442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Increase in flexor but not extensor corticospinal motor outputs following ischemic nerve block.
Vallence AM; Hammond GR; Reilly KT
J Neurophysiol; 2012 Jun; 107(12):3417-27. PubMed ID: 22457455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the reciprocal Ia inhibitory interneurones in the human wrist.
Kato T; Kasai T; Maehara T
Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Apr; 94(2):575-94. PubMed ID: 12027355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intensity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability in chronic spinal cord injury.
Murray LM; Edwards DJ; Ruffini G; Labar D; Stampas A; Pascual-Leone A; Cortes M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Apr; 96(4 Suppl):S114-21. PubMed ID: 25461825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anodal tDCS of contralesional hemisphere modulates ipsilateral control of spinal motor networks targeting the paretic arm post-stroke.
Klomjai W; Giron A; Mounir El Mendili M; Aymard C; Pradat-Diehl P; Roche N; Katz R; Bayen E; Lackmy-Vallee A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2022 Apr; 136():1-12. PubMed ID: 35131634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Muscle-specific variations in use-dependent crossed-facilitation of corticospinal pathways mediated by transcranial direct current (DC) stimulation.
Carson RG; Kennedy NC; Linden MA; Britton L
Neurosci Lett; 2008 Aug; 441(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 18582535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation can induce bidirectional shifts in motor cortical excitability in awake humans.
Groppa S; Bergmann TO; Siems C; Mölle M; Marshall L; Siebner HR
Neuroscience; 2010 Apr; 166(4):1219-25. PubMed ID: 20083166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Short-term effects of functional electrical stimulation on spinal excitatory and inhibitory reflexes in ankle extensor and flexor muscles.
Thompson AK; Doran B; Stein RB
Exp Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 170(2):216-26. PubMed ID: 16317575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of anodal tDCS on lumbar propriospinal system in healthy subjects.
Roche N; Lackmy A; Achache V; Bussel B; Katz R
Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 May; 123(5):1027-34. PubMed ID: 22014699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The association of motor imagery and kinesthetic illusion prolongs the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal tract excitability.
Kaneko F; Shibata E; Hayami T; Nagahata K; Aoyama T
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Apr; 13():36. PubMed ID: 27079199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
