BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24920573)

  • 1. Perceptions of plain packaging among young adult roll-your-own smokers in France: a naturalistic approach.
    Gallopel-Morvan K; Moodie C; Eker F; Beguinot E; Martinet Y
    Tob Control; 2015 Mar; 24(e1):e39-44. PubMed ID: 24920573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Young adult smokers' perceptions of plain packaging: a pilot naturalistic study.
    Moodie C; Mackintosh AM; Hastings G; Ford A
    Tob Control; 2011 Sep; 20(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 21752795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Young women smokers' response to using plain cigarette packaging: qualitative findings from a naturalistic study.
    Moodie C; Bauld L; Ford A; Mackintosh AM
    BMC Public Health; 2014 Aug; 14():812. PubMed ID: 25100245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How does increasingly plainer cigarette packaging influence adult smokers' perceptions about brand image? An experimental study.
    Wakefield MA; Germain D; Durkin SJ
    Tob Control; 2008 Dec; 17(6):416-21. PubMed ID: 18827035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consumer perceptions of cigarette pack design in France: a comparison of regular, limited edition and plain packaging.
    Gallopel-Morvan K; Moodie C; Hammond D; Eker F; Beguinot E; Martinet Y
    Tob Control; 2012 Sep; 21(5):502-6. PubMed ID: 21998127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Young adult women smokers' response to using plain cigarette packaging: a naturalistic approach.
    Moodie CS; Mackintosh AM
    BMJ Open; 2013 Mar; 3(3):. PubMed ID: 23512839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reasons for Using Roll-Your-Own Tobacco and Perceptions of Health-Promoting Pack Inserts: A Focus Group Study with Roll-Your-Own Tobacco Smokers in Scotland.
    Moodie C; O'Donnell R
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2022 Nov; 24(12):1937-1944. PubMed ID: 35907266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Young adult smokers' perceptions of plain packs, numbered packs and pack inserts in Turkey: a focus group study.
    Mucan B; Moodie C
    Tob Control; 2018 Nov; 27(6):631-636. PubMed ID: 29123023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of structural packaging design on young adult smokers' perceptions of tobacco products.
    Borland R; Savvas S; Sharkie F; Moore K
    Tob Control; 2013 Mar; 22(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 22166265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of Australia's introduction of tobacco plain packs on adult smokers' pack-related perceptions and responses: results from a continuous tracking survey.
    Dunlop SM; Dobbins T; Young JM; Perez D; Currow DC
    BMJ Open; 2014 Dec; 4(12):e005836. PubMed ID: 25524542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tobacco packaging design for reducing tobacco use.
    McNeill A; Gravely S; Hitchman SC; Bauld L; Hammond D; Hartmann-Boyce J
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 4(4):CD011244. PubMed ID: 28447363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptions of branded and plain cigarette packaging among Mexican youth.
    Mutti S; Hammond D; Reid JL; White CM; Thrasher JF
    Health Promot Int; 2017 Aug; 32(4):650-659. PubMed ID: 26826368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Standardised packs and larger health warnings: visual attention and perceptions among Colombian smokers and non-smokers.
    Sillero-Rejon C; Mahmoud O; Tamayo RM; Clavijo-Alvarez AA; Adams S; Maynard OM
    Addiction; 2022 Jun; 117(6):1737-1747. PubMed ID: 34882868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of first exposure to plain cigarette packaging on smoking behaviour and attitudes: a randomised controlled study.
    Maynard OM; Leonards U; Attwood AS; Bauld L; Hogarth L; Munafò MR
    BMC Public Health; 2015 Mar; 15():240. PubMed ID: 25880278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Young smokers and non-smokers perceptions of typical users of plain vs. branded cigarette packs: a between-subjects experimental survey.
    Lund I; Scheffels J
    BMC Public Health; 2013 Oct; 13():1005. PubMed ID: 24156515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Impact of Including Cessation Resource Information on Health Warnings on Standardized Tobacco Packaging on Awareness and Use: A Longitudinal Online Survey in the United Kingdom.
    Moodie C; Best C; Critchlow N; Stead M; McNeill A; Hitchman S
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2021 May; 23(6):1068-1073. PubMed ID: 33252668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The potential impact of plain packaging of cigarette products among Brazilian young women: an experimental study.
    White CM; Hammond D; Thrasher JF; Fong GT
    BMC Public Health; 2012 Sep; 12():737. PubMed ID: 22943135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of plain package branding and graphic health warnings on adolescent smokers in the USA, Spain and France.
    Andrews JC; Netemeyer RG; Burton S; Kees J
    Tob Control; 2016 Dec; 25(e2):e120-e126. PubMed ID: 27091642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in roll-your-own tobacco and cigarette sales volume and prices before, during and after plain packaging legislation in the UK.
    Opazo Breton M; Britton J; Bogdanovica I
    Tob Control; 2020 May; 29(3):263-268. PubMed ID: 31073097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of pictorial warning label message framing and standardized packaging on cigarette packaging appeal among young adult smokers.
    Johnson AC; Luta G; Tercyak KP; Niaura RS; Mays D
    Addict Behav; 2021 Sep; 120():106951. PubMed ID: 33895661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.