BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24921846)

  • 1. The effect of cervical posterior foraminotomy on segmental range of motion in the setting of total disc arthroplasty.
    Bevevino AJ; Lehman RA; Kang DG; Gwinn DE; Dmitriev AE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Sep; 39(19):1572-7. PubMed ID: 24921846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of posterior decompressive procedures on segmental range of motion after cervical total disc arthroplasty.
    Brody MJ; Patel AA; Ghanayem AJ; Wojewnik B; Carandang G; Havey RM; Voronov LI; Vastardis G; Potluri T; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Sep; 39(19):1558-63. PubMed ID: 24979138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
    Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Kinematics of progressive circumferential ligament resection (decompression) in conjunction with cervical disc arthroplasty in a spondylotic spine model.
    Roberto RF; McDonald T; Curtiss S; Neu CP; Kim K; Pennings F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Aug; 35(18):1676-83. PubMed ID: 20508554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
    Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC
    Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Motion response of a polycrystalline diamond adaptive axis of rotation cervical total disc arthroplasty.
    Havey RM; Khayatzadeh S; Voronov LI; Blank KR; Carandang G; Harding DP; Patwardhan AG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Feb; 62():34-41. PubMed ID: 30665037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of segmental cervical spine vertebral motion after prodisc-C cervical disc replacement.
    Park JJ; Quirno M; Cunningham MR; Schwarzkopf R; Bendo JA; Spivak JM; Goldstein JA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(8):E285-9. PubMed ID: 20354472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disc replacement adjacent to cervical fusion: a biomechanical comparison of hybrid construct versus two-level fusion.
    Lee MJ; Dumonski M; Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Renner SM; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Nov; 36(23):1932-9. PubMed ID: 21289581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical evaluation of the ProDisc-C stability following graded posterior cervical injury.
    Staudt MD; Rabin D; Baaj AA; Crawford NR; Duggal N
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 29(5):515-524. PubMed ID: 30168784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adjacent-level range of motion and intradiscal pressure after posterior cervical decompression and fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Kretzer RM; Hsu W; Hu N; Umekoji H; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E778-85. PubMed ID: 22228326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics.
    Dmitriev AE; Kuklo TR; Lehman RA; Rosner MK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):E188-96. PubMed ID: 17413459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical evaluation of adjacent segment degeneration after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: A finite element analysis.
    Hua W; Zhi J; Wang B; Ke W; Sun W; Yang S; Li L; Yang C
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Jun; 189():105352. PubMed ID: 31991316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel total cervical prosthesis in a single-level cervical subtotal corpectomy model: an in vitro human cadaveric study.
    Wu ZX; Han BJ; Zhao X; Kong L; Liu D; Cui G; Lei W
    J Surg Res; 2012 Jun; 175(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 21492873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical evaluation of a metal-on-metal cervical intervertebral disc prosthesis.
    Colle KO; Butler JB; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Theodore N; Crawford NR
    Spine J; 2013 Nov; 13(11):1640-9. PubMed ID: 24094992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of uncovertebral joint excision on the motion response of the cervical spine after total disc replacement.
    Snyder JT; Tzermiadianos MN; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov LI; Rinella A; Dooris A; Carandang G; Renner SM; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2965-9. PubMed ID: 18091488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical evaluation of a low-profile, anchored cervical interbody spacer device at the index level or adjacent to plated fusion.
    Balaram AK; Ghanayem AJ; OʼLeary PT; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jun; 39(13):E763-9. PubMed ID: 24732831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Kinematics of cervical total disc replacement adjacent to a two-level, straight versus lordotic fusion.
    Martin S; Ghanayem AJ; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Renner SM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Aug; 36(17):1359-66. PubMed ID: 21629170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Dmitriev AE; Cunningham BW; Hu N; Sell G; Vigna F; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 May; 30(10):1165-72. PubMed ID: 15897831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.